-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 691
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Support for Multi-Arch and Multi-Platform Images #1599
Comments
Hello! Any progress? I really want to see bazel way to build multi-arch and multi-platform images. It would simplify so much our kubernetes configuration |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days. |
Any updates? |
Any updates? |
Somewhat blocked on bazelbuild/bazel#6519 Some discussion in #300 I've got ideas in #1695 (comment) but need some guidance re: the rules UX. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days. |
keep is open |
I have this necessity today. |
any update? |
The pull request to support fat manifest is ready since 3 months >>> #2087 |
+1 |
3 similar comments
+1 |
+1 |
+1 |
+++++ |
+999 |
while (true) + |
😂 |
|
👀 |
+1 |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 180 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in 30 days. |
It's currently not possible to use
docker manifest
anddocker buildx
to build multi-arch and multi-platform images. This is necessary if you're targeting multiple architectures (amd64, arm64, etc.) as well as multiple operating systems, (linux, windows_2004, windows_1909, etc). Windows here is interesting in that there's strict host compatibility requirements.https://www.docker.com/blog/multi-arch-build-and-images-the-simple-way/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: