-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 273
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to opt-out from library evolution #2401
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
43f91e9
to
2a9981b
Compare
aa7633c
to
d7358b3
Compare
1d8a5ce
to
a6adebb
Compare
d886302
to
a9d7b07
Compare
We should land cherry-picks as their own PRs. I commented in that PR as well. |
@brentleyjones Makes sense. Is there anything I can do to help with #2104? |
Is #2104 (comment) resolved? |
As the title says. A followup on #2401 (closed as I reorganised my fork a bit).
The pull request adds support for packaging XCFrameworks that were build with library evolution disabled. Additionally it contains changes from Add the
apple.no_legacy_swiftinterface
feature to disable the automatic library evolution transition on framework rules PR that are essential for the packaging to work.