Prevent failures creating output directories #17968
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
awaiting-review
sgowroji
added
the
team-Remote-Exec
I would receive reports of build failures along these lines: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo' In order to root cause this, I made a minor change to Bazel to extend its logging. See bazelbuild#17951. With that change applied, the error became: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo': .../some/path/foo (Not a directory) I was eventually able to reproduce this by manually creating an output file at bazel-bin/some/path, followed by attempting to build the target. It looks like Bazel simply attempts to create output directories without taking into consideration whether a file already exists at the target location. This is problematic when someone alters an existing build target to emit a directory instead of a regular file. Note that this only an issue when the remote action file system is used. Plain builds (ones that don't use Builds without the Bytes or bb_clientd) are unaffected. This change addresses this issue by reusing the same fallback path creation strategy that plain builds already use.
EdSchouten
force-pushed
the
eschouten/20230404-create-output-directories
branch
from
1d5c4c4
to
1a96230
Compare
EdSchouten
changed the title
coeuvre
added
awaiting-PR-merge
|
@bazel-io flag |
bazel-io
added
the
potential release blocker
sgowroji
removed
the
awaiting-PR-merge
|
@bazel-io fork 6.2.0 |
bazel-io
removed
the
potential release blocker
ShreeM01
pushed a commit
to ShreeM01/bazel
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2023
I would receive reports of build failures along these lines: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo' In order to root cause this, I made a minor change to Bazel to extend its logging. See bazelbuild#17951. With that change applied, the error became: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo': .../some/path/foo (Not a directory) I was eventually able to reproduce this by manually creating an output file at bazel-bin/some/path, followed by attempting to build the target. It looks like Bazel simply attempts to create output directories without taking into consideration whether a file already exists at the target location. This is problematic when someone alters an existing build target to emit a directory instead of a regular file. Note that this only an issue when the remote action file system is used. Plain builds (ones that don't use Builds without the Bytes or bb_clientd) are unaffected. This change addresses this issue by reusing the same fallback path creation strategy that plain builds already use. Closes bazelbuild#17968. PiperOrigin-RevId: 523408378 Change-Id: I0d7559352687c317de72e0bf5bc6b5ba7452f97e
ShreeM01
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2023
I would receive reports of build failures along these lines: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo' In order to root cause this, I made a minor change to Bazel to extend its logging. See #17951. With that change applied, the error became: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo': .../some/path/foo (Not a directory) I was eventually able to reproduce this by manually creating an output file at bazel-bin/some/path, followed by attempting to build the target. It looks like Bazel simply attempts to create output directories without taking into consideration whether a file already exists at the target location. This is problematic when someone alters an existing build target to emit a directory instead of a regular file. Note that this only an issue when the remote action file system is used. Plain builds (ones that don't use Builds without the Bytes or bb_clientd) are unaffected. This change addresses this issue by reusing the same fallback path creation strategy that plain builds already use. Closes #17968. PiperOrigin-RevId: 523408378 Change-Id: I0d7559352687c317de72e0bf5bc6b5ba7452f97e Co-authored-by: Ed Schouten <[email protected]>
fweikert
pushed a commit
to fweikert/bazel
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2023
I would receive reports of build failures along these lines: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo' In order to root cause this, I made a minor change to Bazel to extend its logging. See bazelbuild#17951. With that change applied, the error became: > ERROR: some/path/BUILD:156:32: Executing genrule //some/path:some_target failed: failed to create output directory '.../some/path/foo': .../some/path/foo (Not a directory) I was eventually able to reproduce this by manually creating an output file at bazel-bin/some/path, followed by attempting to build the target. It looks like Bazel simply attempts to create output directories without taking into consideration whether a file already exists at the target location. This is problematic when someone alters an existing build target to emit a directory instead of a regular file. Note that this only an issue when the remote action file system is used. Plain builds (ones that don't use Builds without the Bytes or bb_clientd) are unaffected. This change addresses this issue by reusing the same fallback path creation strategy that plain builds already use. Closes bazelbuild#17968. PiperOrigin-RevId: 523408378 Change-Id: I0d7559352687c317de72e0bf5bc6b5ba7452f97e
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would receive reports of build failures along these lines:
In order to root cause this, I made a minor change to Bazel to extend its logging. See #17951. With that change applied, the error became:
I was eventually able to reproduce this by manually creating an output file at bazel-bin/some/path, followed by attempting to build the target. It looks like Bazel simply attempts to create output directories without taking into consideration whether a file already exists at the target location. This is problematic when someone alters an existing build target to emit a directory instead of a regular file.
Note that this only an issue when the remote action file system is used. Plain builds (ones that don't use Builds without the Bytes or bb_clientd) are unaffected. This change addresses this issue by reusing the same fallback path creation strategy that plain builds already use.