Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bzlmod #3647

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2023
Merged

chore: bzlmod #3647

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 2, 2023

Conversation

alexeagle
Copy link
Collaborator

Previous rules_nodejs entries on bazel-central-registry were created by hand. This moves our 'toolchain' example which is the natural e2e for bare rules_nodejs. We test it on BCR in the normal way.
I'll need to make sure the Publish To BCR app is enabled for the bazelbuild/rules_nodejs repo.

Previous rules_nodejs entries on bazel-central-registry were created by hand.
This moves our 'toolchain' example which is the natural e2e for bare rules_nodejs.
We test it on BCR in the normal way.
I'll need to make sure the Publish To BCR app is enabled for the bazelbuild/rules_nodejs repo.
e2e/smoke/deps.bzl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alexeagle
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I also now depend on aspect_bazel_lib copy_directory instead of the patched copy_file that we vendored from bazel-skylib, hopefully means we can drop that for 6.0

@alexeagle alexeagle merged commit 46a6013 into 6.x Apr 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants