-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 522
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
source map support in coverage reports #867
Comments
This however is blocked on #823 Also blocked on and istanbuljs/v8-to-istanbul#31 |
Aside from the blocking issues it's minor changes needed on our side so just going to document that here for now:
|
I think the best way to handle this would be to add a We'll still need to handle the reporting at the end of However, if we switched to |
Hello @Toxicable is there any update on this |
@thesayyn Yeah so I know what needs to be done to make this change So untill we figure out source maps properly, this is blocked |
Hi, @Toxicable, the issues you point to here are now closed. Does this mean this issue has a chance to progress? |
I have working TS coverage now with two patches:
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in two weeks. Collaborators can add a "cleanup" or "need: discussion" label to keep it open indefinitely. Thanks for your contributions to rules_nodejs! |
This issue was automatically closed because it went two weeks without a reply since it was labeled "Can Close?" |
🚀 feature request
Relevant Rules
jasmine_node_test
Description
We should still use
v8-coverage
to collect coverage reports without having to fork the process.However, c8 and transitively v8-to-istanbul provide better reporting due to having source map support and more up to date istanbul deps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: