Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better metadata #97

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 4, 2018
Merged

Better metadata #97

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 4, 2018

Conversation

ballercat
Copy link
Owner

@ballercat ballercat commented Mar 4, 2018

Metadata is awkward. It grew to become a catch-all for a lot of things, mostly types. Overloading the type field might be a better option for a lot of these.

  • POJ metadata
  • Add flowtypes for specific Nodes and their type data

@ballercat ballercat mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2018
7 tasks
@ballercat ballercat merged commit 1af087f into v0.4.0 Mar 4, 2018
@ballercat ballercat deleted the better-metadata branch March 4, 2018 23:38
ballercat added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2018
* Print nodes as wast text format (#92)

* Global arrays (#93)

* Join together compiler tests

* fix global arrays

* fix sniffs

* fix i64 global bug (#96)

* Better metadata (#97)

* make metadata a poj-o

* remove getter

* coverage

* Memory, Table as generics syntax (#98)

* generic memory type

* delete some old specs

* update specs

* Support Table<> syntax, update examples + specs

* Name section and basic config object (#102)

* Implement basic name section

* implement full name section

* make version configurable

* fix flow errors

* start tweaking unit test reports

* Identify and fix loop bugs

* fix imports bugs, more coverage

* builds
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant