Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[META] Site "Status report" page issues. #283

Closed
3 tasks done
klonos opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

[META] Site "Status report" page issues. #283

klonos opened this issue Jul 29, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@klonos
Copy link
Member

klonos commented Jul 29, 2014

I've been testing Backdrop more and more lately and I'm doing so on a local nginx/MySQL/PHP stack on my Windows laptop. I assume that a lot of people that wish to give Backdrop a spin will be doing so locally too before deploying on actual hosting environments.

Now I'm a "all green" maniac when it comes to the site status page. From my experience I know that it's ok for some things to not be ok in this page, but from a newcomer perspective it is scary to see too many errors. Especially when they don't matter, don't make sense, do not apply in certain cases or if no action can be taken on specific scenarios.

So, here's a list of warnings in the "Status report" page that either cannot be resolved on specific cases or don't make sense at all:

Any other OS-specific use cases that are related to the "Status report" page messages, please add them here as tasks and lets discuss what would be the reasonable thing to do. I guess separate issues should be filed for each case.

@jenlampton
Copy link
Member

Thanks @klonos, these are great suggestions.

I don't think we should waste time on the available updates message yet - let's wait until we get close to a 1.0.0 release and see if we have an update server up and running. If we aren't close to having the update server and we are close to a release, then yes, we should do something about the nag message.

I like the idea of making our messages better for users on all platforms. That goes for both the settings.php file on windows, and the PHP upload progress message.

Thanks for the d.o issue links, we should peep what's going on over there. Our minimum PHP version is PHP 5.3.6 so we may not be able to use anything that's PHP 5.4 specific, but we can still do a bit better.

@klonos
Copy link
Member Author

klonos commented Jul 29, 2014

I think that the issue about the built-in uploadprogress in PHP 5.4 is to support using it if the php_uploadprogress extension is not available. That doesn't mean that we drop support for the separate php_uploadprogress extension. Besides, from what I see, the 1.0.3.1 version of the extension has versions available for PHP 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6 (at least for windows), so I think that it can still be used with PHP 5.4 and above.

@Bojhan
Copy link

Bojhan commented Aug 10, 2014

Also this page should be redesigned to be muuuch more prettier

@quicksketch
Copy link
Member

We're discussing the second bullet point over in #395. I updated the issue summary to reflect the issues in which we're working on each of these.

@xmacinfo
Copy link

The status report should be changed to Dashboard (the actual redesigned status report + Dashboard-type status/health information in a pluggable way):

Eg.:
• Number of nodes
• Number of users
• Visitors/page views statistics

My two cents. :-)

@jenlampton
Copy link
Member

yes, backdrop should have a useful dashboard (just created #495 as a reminder) but I still think thats distinctly different from the status report.

@quicksketch
Copy link
Member

With 1-3 addressed. I feel like we should close this issue. The redesign of the status report page is a pretty big unknown, as we don't have anything to go on other than it should be prettier.

@jenlampton
Copy link
Member

I agree. We have another issue for the redesign of the status report so we won't loose track of that. (removing from the meta)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants