Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add monitor mode #141

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged

feat: Add monitor mode #141

merged 11 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023

Conversation

gitferry
Copy link
Collaborator

@gitferry gitferry commented Feb 2, 2023

This PR adds the monitor implementation to the vigilante program. The running of the monitor is independent of the other vigilante modes. The current implementation works in local deployment with other components (Babylon testnet, reporter, submitter, and btcd). Will dockerize it in a subsequent PR.

This PR relies on a recent commit of Babylon that fixed bugs in the monitor module to support the vigilante monitor.

@gitferry gitferry requested review from SebastianElvis, gusin13 and vitsalis and removed request for gusin13 February 2, 2023 13:31
Copy link
Member

@SebastianElvis SebastianElvis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@gitferry gitferry merged commit 33cdce8 into dev Feb 3, 2023
@gitferry gitferry deleted the monitor branch February 3, 2023 02:00
@vitsalis vitsalis restored the monitor branch February 3, 2023 09:00
@vitsalis vitsalis mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2023
@vitsalis vitsalis deleted the monitor branch February 3, 2023 12:26
vitsalis added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2023
#141 used the squash and merge feature which removed the history of the
dependent commits. We reversed the commit and are doing a new PR for
that.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants