Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update physical database name from jdbc_testdb to babelfish_db #3243

Conversation

anju15bharti
Copy link
Contributor

@anju15bharti anju15bharti commented Dec 12, 2024

Description

Update physical database name to babelfish_db to make it uniform.

Issues Resolved

[List any issues this PR will resolve]

Test Scenarios Covered

  • Use case based -

  • Boundary conditions -

  • Arbitrary inputs -

  • Negative test cases -

  • Minor version upgrade tests -

  • Major version upgrade tests -

  • Performance tests -

  • Tooling impact -

  • Client tests -

Check List

  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and PostgreSQL licenses, and grant any person obtaining a copy of the contribution permission to relicense all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL License solely to contribute all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL open source project.

For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12296168040

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 74.844%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12295183613: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 46494
Relevant Lines: 62121

💛 - Coveralls

@thephantomthief
Copy link
Contributor

Just check if we need to make any change in engine repo. Probably not needed.

@anju15bharti
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just check if we need to make any change in engine repo. Probably not needed.

Not needed in engine.

@shardgupta shardgupta merged commit 3c85d27 into babelfish-for-postgresql:BABEL_5_X_DEV Dec 13, 2024
44 checks passed
@shardgupta shardgupta deleted the update-physical-db-name branch December 13, 2024 06:52
anju15bharti added a commit to amazon-aurora/babelfish_extensions that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
…fish-for-postgresql#3243)

Before this commit, physical database name was jdbc_testdb.

With this commit, physical database name has been changed to
babelfish_db to make it uniform.

Signed-off-by: [email protected]
anju15bharti pushed a commit to amazon-aurora/babelfish_extensions that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
shardgupta pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
#3248)

Before this commit, physical database name was jdbc_testdb.

With this commit, physical database name has been changed to babelfish_db to make it uniform.
Minor version upgrade and pg_dump and restore WF contains following changes:
    * Checked out to latest version before running prepare script to get physical dbname from latest.
    * Exported physicalDatabaseName as babelfish_db for pg_dump restore WF for version other than latest.

Signed-off-by: Anju Bharti <[email protected]>
timchang514 pushed a commit to amazon-aurora/babelfish_extensions that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
…fish-for-postgresql#3243) (babelfish-for-postgresql#3248)

Before this commit, physical database name was jdbc_testdb.

With this commit, physical database name has been changed to babelfish_db to make it uniform.
Minor version upgrade and pg_dump and restore WF contains following changes:
    * Checked out to latest version before running prepare script to get physical dbname from latest.
    * Exported physicalDatabaseName as babelfish_db for pg_dump restore WF for version other than latest.

Signed-off-by: Anju Bharti <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants