Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create database not visible in the pg_stat_statements view #1359

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: BABEL_3_X_DEV
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kritika-0601
Copy link
Contributor

@kritika-0601 kritika-0601 commented Mar 22, 2023

Currently Babelfish does not show create database query inside the pg_stat_statements table. After my change now it is visible in the view.
pg_stat_statements displays planning and execution statistics for all SQL statements executed by a server. Some statements like create and drop database was not being tracked. Mainly because subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being called.
Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant ProcessUtility function.

Link for engine PR: babelfish-for-postgresql/postgresql_modified_for_babelfish#114

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is under the terms of the PostgreSQL license, and grant any person obtaining a copy of the contribution permission to relicense all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL License solely to contribute all or a portion of my contribution to the PostgreSQL open source project.

For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Kritika and others added 11 commits March 22, 2023 11:10
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Kritika and others added 2 commits April 2, 2023 13:57
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
kritika-0601 and others added 3 commits April 6, 2023 11:43
Subsequent processutility hooks after bbf_processutilty were not being
called. Created a hook for that and called it inside relevant
ProcessUtility function.

Signed-off-by: Kritika <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants