This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 31, 2018. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
src: cancel pending delayed platform tasks on exit #120
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable.
3 tasks
@ayojs/core Also definitely a bit trickier. I have tried to write a helpful commit message but I know this is not the most well-known area of Node/Ayo :) |
Qard
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2017
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2017
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. PR-URL: #120 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
Landed in 9590bcb |
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 2, 2017
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]>
addaleax
added a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2017
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. Original-PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Original-Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> PR-URL: #16700 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2017
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. Original-PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Original-Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> PR-URL: #16700 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2018
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. Original-PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Original-Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> PR-URL: nodejs#16700 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2018
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. Backport-PR-URL: #20901 Original-PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Original-Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> PR-URL: #16700 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
rvagg
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2018
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop. To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop is removed from the platform. It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable. Backport-PR-URL: #20901 Original-PR-URL: ayojs/ayo#120 Original-Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <[email protected]> PR-URL: #16700 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Worker threads need an event loop without active libuv handles in
order to shut down. One source of handles that was previously
not accounted for were delayed V8 tasks; these create timers
that would be standing in the way of clearing the event loop.
To solve this, keep track of the scheduled tasks in a list
and close their timer handles before the corresponding isolate/loop
is removed from the platform.
It is not clear from the V8 documentation what the expectation is
with respect to pending background tasks at the end of the
isolate lifetime; however, an alternative approach of executing
these scheduled tasks when flushing them led to an infinite loop
of tasks scheduling each other; so it seems safe to assume that
the behaviour implemented in this patch is at least acceptable.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
src/node_platform