Refactor/logic limits type #791
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes across multiple files in the codebase, focusing on simplifying numeric handling, updating gas usage values, and enhancing migration capabilities. Key modifications include the removal of the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #791 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 43.28% 42.73% -0.55%
==========================================
Files 110 111 +1
Lines 5205 6273 +1068
==========================================
+ Hits 2253 2681 +428
- Misses 2828 3468 +640
Partials 124 124
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (1)
Line range hint
1-58: Overall assessment of gas usage optimizationThe changes in this file, specifically the reduction in
gas_usedvalues, are part of a broader optimization effort observed across multiple feature files. While these changes don't directly relate to theuint64type updates mentioned in the PR objectives, they contribute to the overall goal of improving the codebase's efficiency.Consider adding a note in the PR description about these gas usage optimizations, as they represent a significant improvement that wasn't explicitly mentioned in the original objectives.
To quantify the overall impact of these optimizations, you might want to run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Calculate the total gas usage reduction across all feature files # Test: Sum up all gas usage changes rg -U --multiline 'gas_used: (\d+)\n.*\n.*gas_used: (\d+)' '*.feature' | awk '{sum += $2 - $4} END {print "Total gas reduction: " sum}'This will help in documenting the extent of the optimization achieved through these changes.
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask.go (1)
Line range hint
1-65: LGTM: Code cleanup and simplification.The removal of unused imports and the
defaultSolutionsLimitvariable aligns well with the code simplification objectives.Consider running a linter to ensure all unused imports have been removed and the import order is optimized.
x/logic/types/params_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-95: Suggestions for enhancing the test suiteWhile the current test suite is comprehensive, consider the following improvements:
Add specific test cases for the new
uint64limits to ensure they behave correctly at edge cases (e.g., maximumuint64value).Consider transitioning from
goconveyto the standard Go testing package with table-driven tests. This would align the testing style with modern Go practices and potentially simplify the test structure.Example of a table-driven test:
func TestValidateParams(t *testing.T) { tests := []struct { name string params types.Params wantErr bool errString string }{ { name: "default params", params: types.DefaultParams(), wantErr: false, }, { name: "custom params", params: types.NewParams( types.NewInterpreter( types.WithBootstrap("bootstrap"), ), types.NewLimits( types.WithMaxSize(2), types.WithMaxResultCount(3), types.WithMaxUserOutputSize(4), types.WithMaxVariables(5), ), ), wantErr: false, }, // Add more test cases here } for _, tt := range tests { t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { err := tt.params.Validate() if (err != nil) != tt.wantErr { t.Errorf("Validate() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.wantErr) } if tt.wantErr && err != nil && err.Error() != tt.errString { t.Errorf("Validate() error = %v, wantErr %v", err, tt.errString) } }) } }This structure can make it easier to add and maintain test cases in the future.
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (1)
42-45: LGTM! Consider adding tests with larger values.The changes align well with the PR objectives, simplifying the test setup by using direct integer values instead of
math.NewUint(). This reflects the update fromcosmossdk.io/math.Uinttouint64in the actual implementation.Consider adding test cases with larger values to ensure the full range of
uint64is properly handled. For example:types.NewLimits( types.WithMaxSize(18446744073709551615), // max uint64 types.WithMaxResultCount(9223372036854775807), // max int64 types.WithMaxUserOutputSize(1000000), types.WithMaxVariables(1000000), ),This would help verify that the system correctly handles values across the entire range of
uint64.proto/logic/v1beta2/query.proto (2)
53-53: Approve change with a minor suggestion for documentation.The change from
stringtouint64for thelimitfield is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives. It improves type safety and consistency across the codebase.Consider updating the comment to reflect the new data type:
- // limit specifies the maximum number of solutions to be returned. This field is governed by + // limit specifies the maximum number of solutions to be returned (as a non-negative integer). This field is governed byThis minor change in documentation explicitly states that the limit should be a non-negative integer, which is implied by the
uint64type but may be helpful for API users.
53-53: Consider API compatibility and migration strategy.While the change to
uint64for thelimitfield is an improvement, it may break compatibility with existing clients expecting a string value.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Consider implementing a temporary backward compatibility layer that accepts both string and uint64 inputs, if feasible within the protocol buffer and gRPC framework.
- Update API documentation to clearly communicate this change to users.
- If possible, implement versioning in your API (e.g., v1beta2 to v1beta3) to allow gradual migration.
- Provide migration guides for client implementations to update their code accordingly.
These steps will help manage the transition and minimize disruption for API consumers.
x/logic/util/prolog.go (1)
27-27: LGTM! Consider updating the function documentation.The change from
sdkmath.Uinttouint64forsolutionsLimitis consistent with the broader refactoring effort and simplifies type handling.Consider updating the function documentation to reflect this type change:
// QueryInterpreter interprets a query and returns the solutions up to the given limit. // // Parameters: // - ctx: The context for the query execution. // - i: The Prolog interpreter instance. // - query: The Prolog query string to be executed. // - solutionsLimit: The maximum number of solutions to return (uint64).x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (1)
Line range hint
1-350: Consider updating documentation if necessary.Given the significant change in gas usage for the
bech32_address/2predicate, it may be necessary to update any relevant documentation that mentions gas costs or performance characteristics of this operation.Could you please review and update any documentation that references the gas usage or performance of the
bech32_address/2predicate?x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (1)
Line range hint
295-373: LGTM: Comprehensive error handling test cases added.The new test cases significantly improve the test coverage for error handling and limit behavior. They align well with the PR's objectives and enhance the robustness of the test suite.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
throw(error(resource_error(foo)))line to improve readability for future maintainers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/logic/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
- proto/logic/v1beta2/params.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta2/query.proto (1 hunks)
- x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/fs/filtered/fs_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/interpreter/interpreter.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (17 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (3 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (9 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (11 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (10 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (5 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/types/params.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/types/params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/util/pointer.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/util/pointer_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/logic/util/prolog.go (4 hunks)
- x/logic/wasm/types.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- x/logic/util/pointer_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
x/logic/fs/filtered/fs_test.go (2)
Learnt from: ccamel PR: axone-protocol/axoned#678 File: x/logic/fs/filtered/fs.go:34-36 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T17:06:13.771Z Learning: The test coverage for the `ReadFile` and `accept` methods in the `filtered` package of the `logic` module has been significantly improved by the user ccamel.Learnt from: ccamel PR: axone-protocol/axoned#678 File: x/logic/fs/filtered/fs.go:34-36 Timestamp: 2024-06-17T20:01:09.109Z Learning: The test coverage for the `ReadFile` and `accept` methods in the `filtered` package of the `logic` module has been significantly improved by the user ccamel.x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (2)
Learnt from: ccamel PR: axone-protocol/axoned#769 File: x/logic/predicate/bank.go:163-164 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T17:06:13.771Z Learning: In this repository, CI with test coverage is enabled, so there's no need to check test coverage during code reviews.Learnt from: ccamel PR: axone-protocol/axoned#769 File: x/logic/predicate/bank.go:163-164 Timestamp: 2024-10-05T09:57:10.602Z Learning: In this repository, CI with test coverage is enabled, so there's no need to check test coverage during code reviews.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by testsx/logic/util/prolog.go
[warning] 36-37: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L36-L37
Added lines #L36 - L37 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-39: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L39
Added line #L39 was not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (65)
x/logic/util/pointer.go (2)
9-12: LGTM! Improved implementation ofNonZeroOrDefault.The function has been successfully refactored to use the new
IsZerofunction, making it more generic and simpler. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of simplifying the codebase and improving type handling.
Line range hint
1-18: Overall changes align well with PR objectives.The modifications to this file, including the simplification of
NonZeroOrDefaultand the addition of the genericIsZerofunction, are in line with the PR's goal of updating data types and improving the codebase. These changes should work well with the shift touint64types mentioned in the PR objectives.The removal of
DerefOrDefaultandNonZeroOrDefaultUIntfunctions (as mentioned in the AI summary but not visible in the provided code) also contributes to the simplification of the codebase.To ensure these changes don't introduce any regressions, it would be beneficial to run the existing test suite and verify that all tests pass with the new implementations.
x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1)
34-34: Verify the reduced gas usage and update documentation if needed.The change in
gas_usedfrom 4141 to 3613 indicates an optimization in the underlying implementation of theopen/3predicate or related operations. This aligns with similar gas usage reductions observed in other feature files.
- Please confirm that this reduction is intentional and consistent with the optimizations made in the codebase.
- Ensure that any performance-related documentation or specifications are updated to reflect this improvement in gas efficiency.
- Consider adding a comment in the feature file to explain the reason for this specific gas usage value, which can help maintain the test's clarity over time.
To confirm the consistency of this change across the codebase, you can run the following script:
This will help ensure that the gas usage reduction is consistent across different predicates and scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Gas usage reduction verified successfully.
The
gas_usedvalue inopen_3.featurehas been updated to3613, consistent with similar optimizations in other feature files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar gas usage changes in other feature files # Search for changes in gas_used values across all feature files rg -U --multiline --multiline-dotall 'gas_used: \d+' 'x/logic/keeper/features/*.feature'Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate all .feature files in the repository fd --extension feature --type fLength of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for 'gas_used' values in all identified feature files rg -U --multiline --multiline-dotall 'gas_used: \d+' x/logic/keeper/features/*.featureLength of output: 3081
x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (3)
19-19: Gas usage optimization observedThe
gas_usedvalue has been reduced from 4140 to 3612, indicating a significant optimization in the underlying implementation. This change aligns with the PR's objective of refactoring and improving efficiency.
46-46: Consistent gas usage improvementThe
gas_usedvalue has been reduced from 4141 to 3613, showing a consistent optimization across different scenarios. This change further supports the efficiency improvements introduced by this PR.
Line range hint
1-54: Overall impact of gas usage changesThe consistent reduction in gas usage across both scenarios (528 gas in each case) suggests a systematic improvement in the efficiency of the
block_height/1predicate. This change is positive as it maintains the existing test coverage while demonstrating enhanced performance.However, it's important to verify that these changes are consistent with other parts of the codebase and that they don't introduce any unintended side effects.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2)
47-47: Consistent gas usage reduction observed.The
gas_usedvalue has been reduced from 4141 to 3613, maintaining the same reduction (528) as in the previous scenario. This consistency suggests a systematic optimization across theblock_time/1predicate usage.To understand the source of this optimization, let's examine the changes in the implementation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Investigate changes related to block_time implementation # Test: Search for changes in files related to block_time rg -p 'block_time' $(git diff --name-only)
19-19: Gas usage optimization detected.The
gas_usedvalue has been reduced from 4140 to 3612, which indicates an optimization in the underlying implementation of theblock_time/1predicate or related operations.To ensure this optimization is consistent across the codebase, let's check other feature files for similar changes:
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask.go (2)
49-52: Simplification approved, but consider performance implications.The simplification of size calculation and limit check is good. However, the removal of the
max_result_countcheck is a significant change.This change allows queries with limits exceeding
MaxResultCount, which could have performance implications. Let's verify if this change is intentional and if there are any compensating controls elsewhere in the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any usage or checks of MaxResultCount in other files # Test 1: Look for any remaining usage of MaxResultCount rg 'MaxResultCount' # Test 2: Check if there are any new limit checks introduced in other files rg -A 5 'func.*Ask.*Request'Consider adding a comment explaining why the
max_result_countcheck was removed and how potential performance issues are mitigated.
45-45: LGTM: Simplified limit handling.The direct passing of
req.Limitaligns with the PR objectives and simplifies the code.Let's verify the type change in the proto file:
x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go (2)
42-42: LGTM: Simplified limit assignmentThe change from
Limit: &limittoLimit: limitaligns with the PR objectives of updating the data types. This simplification is correct as it directly assigns theuint64value to theLimitfield, which is now expected to be of typeuint64instead of a pointer to asdkmath.Uint.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, let's verify the type of the
Limitfield in theQueryServiceAskRequeststruct:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the type of the Limit field in QueryServiceAskRequest # Test: Search for the QueryServiceAskRequest struct definition rg -A 10 'type QueryServiceAskRequest struct'🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by tests
42-42: Consider adding test coverage for the limit assignmentThe static analysis tool indicates that this line is not covered by tests. While the change itself is straightforward, it's important to ensure that the
limitparameter is correctly passed to theQueryServiceAskRequest.To address this, we can verify the existing test coverage and suggest improvements:
If the results show insufficient coverage, consider adding a test case that specifically checks the
limitassignment in theQueryServiceAskRequest.Would you like me to propose a test case to improve coverage for this change?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by testsx/logic/types/params_test.go (3)
37-40: Simplification ofNewLimitsparameters: ApprovedThe changes to the
NewLimitsfunction call simplify the code by using plain integer values instead ofmath.NewUintcalls. This modification aligns with the removal of thecosmossdk.io/mathpackage dependency and is consistent with similar changes in other files.The simplification improves code readability without compromising functionality or precision.
Line range hint
1-95: Test suite integrity maintainedThe changes to the
NewLimitsfunction call do not affect the overall structure or coverage of the test suite. The test cases continue to cover various scenarios, including default parameters, custom parameters, and invalid configurations.This modification aligns well with the PR objectives of updating data types while maintaining the existing functionality and test coverage.
Line range hint
1-95: Summary of review for params_test.go
- The changes to the
NewLimitsfunction call simplify the code by using plain integer values, aligning with the PR objectives.- The overall structure and coverage of the test suite remain intact.
- The modifications are consistent with changes in other files and support the transition to
uint64data types.- Suggestions for enhancing the test suite have been provided, including adding specific tests for
uint64limits and considering a transition to table-driven tests.Overall, the changes are approved and contribute positively to the codebase's clarity and maintainability.
x/logic/interpreter/interpreter.go (2)
Line range hint
1-7: Confirm removal of unused importThe removal of the
cosmossdk.io/mathimport is consistent with the changes made to theWithMaxVariablesfunction. This cleanup improves code maintainability.
70-73: Approve changes with a note on potential impactThe changes to
WithMaxVariablesalign with the PR objectives and simplify the function. The transition from*math.Uinttouint64reduces complexity and improves type safety.However, please note:
- Removal of the null check might affect existing callers that relied on passing nil.
- Ensure all callers of this function are updated to provide valid
uint64values.To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All instances of
WithMaxVariableshave been updated to useuint64, and themathimport has been successfully removed.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of *math.Uint with WithMaxVariables # Test: Search for any calls to WithMaxVariables that might still be using *math.Uint rg -p 'WithMaxVariables\s*\(\s*[^u]' # Test: Verify that math is no longer imported from cosmossdk.io in this file ! rg -q 'cosmossdk\.io/math' x/logic/interpreter/interpreter.go && echo "math import removed successfully" || echo "math import still present"Length of output: 586
x/logic/wasm/types.go (2)
Line range hint
1-94: Verify usage of AskQuery in other parts of the codebaseWhile the change to
AskQuerydoesn't affect other structs in this file, it's important to ensure that all code usingAskQueryis updated to handle the newuint64type forLimit.Please run the following script to find all usages of
AskQueryand verify they're compatible with the newuint64Limit:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of AskQuery and verify compatibility with uint64 Limit # Test: Search for AskQuery usage rg -A 5 'AskQuery'
11-13: LGTM! Verify impact on related code.The change from
*sdkmath.Uinttouint64for theLimitfield aligns with the PR objectives and simplifies the data type. This is a good improvement.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please run the following script to check for any remaining uses of
sdkmath.Uintfor limit-related fields:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! No remaining uses of
sdkmath.Uintfor limit-related fields detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of sdkmath.Uint for limit-related fields # Test: Search for sdkmath.Uint usage in limit-related contexts rg -i '(limit|max.*count|max.*size).*sdkmath\.Uint'Length of output: 1472
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Recheck for any remaining uses of sdkmath.Uint for limit-related fields with corrected syntax # Search for sdkmath.Uint usage in limit-related contexts rg -i '(limit|max_count|max_size).*sdkmath\.Uint'Length of output: 51
x/logic/util/prolog.go (6)
53-53: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The change to
uint64(len(results)) < solutionsLimitis consistent with the transition touint64and simplifies the comparison while maintaining the original logic.The static analysis tool indicates that this line is not covered by tests. To ensure the change works as expected, consider adding or updating test cases to cover this line. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the changed line in prolog.go # Test: Run go test with coverage for the specific file and line go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./x/logic/util go tool cover -html=coverage.out -o coverage.html echo "Test coverage for line 53 in x/logic/util/prolog.go:" grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:53" coverage.out🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 53-53: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
82-82: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The change to
count++is consistent with the transition touint64and simplifies the increment operation while maintaining the original logic.The static analysis tool indicates that this line is not covered by tests. To ensure the change works as expected, consider adding or updating test cases to cover this line. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the changed line in prolog.go # Test: Run go test with coverage for the specific file and line go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./x/logic/util go tool cover -html=coverage.out -o coverage.html echo "Test coverage for line 82 in x/logic/util/prolog.go:" grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:82" coverage.out🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 82-82: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
39-39: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The changes simplify the code by using native
uint64comparisons and operations while maintaining the original logic.The static analysis tool indicates that these lines are not covered by tests. To ensure the changes work as expected, consider adding or updating test cases to cover these lines. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the changed lines in prolog.go # Test: Run go test with coverage for the specific file and lines go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./x/logic/util go tool cover -html=coverage.out -o coverage.html echo "Test coverage for lines 39, 42-43 in x/logic/util/prolog.go:" grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:39" coverage.out grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:42" coverage.out grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:43" coverage.outAlso applies to: 42-43
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 39-39: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L39
Added line #L39 was not covered by tests
87-87: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The change to
count > solutionsLimitis consistent with the transition touint64and simplifies the comparison while maintaining the original logic.The static analysis tool indicates that this line is not covered by tests. To ensure the change works as expected, consider adding or updating test cases to cover this line. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for the changed line in prolog.go # Test: Run go test with coverage for the specific file and line go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./x/logic/util go tool cover -html=coverage.out -o coverage.html echo "Test coverage for line 87 in x/logic/util/prolog.go:" grep -n "x/logic/util/prolog.go:87" coverage.out🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 87-87: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
27-87: Overall LGTM! Consider improving test coverage.The changes in this file successfully transition from
sdkmath.Uinttouint64for thesolutionsLimitparameter and related operations. This simplifies type handling and aligns with the broader refactoring effort across the codebase. The logic remains consistent with the previous implementation while improving code clarity.However, the static analysis tool indicates that most of the changed lines are not covered by tests. To ensure the reliability of these changes and prevent potential regressions, it's highly recommended to improve test coverage for the modified sections of the
QueryInterpreterfunction.To get an overview of the current test coverage for the entire file, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check overall test coverage for prolog.go # Test: Run go test with coverage for the specific file go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./x/logic/util go tool cover -func=coverage.out | grep "prolog.go"This will help identify areas where test coverage can be improved, ensuring the robustness of the refactored code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 36-37: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L36-L37
Added lines #L36 - L37 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-39: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L39
Added line #L39 was not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
36-37: LGTM! Consider adding test coverage.The changes in variable initialization are consistent with the new
uint64type forsolutionsLimitand improve code clarity.The static analysis tool indicates that these lines are not covered by tests. To improve code quality and ensure the changes work as expected, consider adding or updating test cases to cover these lines. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 36-37: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L36-L37
Added lines #L36 - L37 were not covered by testsx/logic/fs/filtered/fs_test.go (3)
101-101: LGTM: Consistent improvement in nil checkingThe change from
util.IsNiltolo.IsNilis consistent with the overall code improvements mentioned in the PR summary. This update likely provides a more standardized or efficient way to perform nil checks without altering the test logic.
120-120: LGTM: Consistent use oflo.IsNilthroughout the fileThis change maintains consistency with the previous update, using
lo.IsNilfor nil checks. This consistency improves code maintainability and readability across the test file.
Line range hint
1-150: Summary: Minor improvements maintain test integrityThe changes in this file are minimal and consistent, focusing on updating the nil-checking method from
util.IsNiltolo.IsNil. These updates align with the PR's goal of code improvement and simplification. The overall structure, logic, and coverage of the tests remain unchanged, ensuring that the existing functionality is preserved while slightly improving code quality and consistency.No issues or concerns were identified during this review. The changes contribute positively to the codebase without affecting the core functionality or test coverage of the
ReadFileandacceptmethods mentioned in the learning notes.x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (6)
13-13: LGTM: Data type update formax_user_output_sizeThe change from string to integer for
max_user_output_sizealigns with the PR objectives and maintains the existing behavior.
31-31: Minor gas usage optimization notedThe
gas_usedvalue has been slightly reduced from 3681 to 3680, indicating a small optimization in the underlying logic.
50-50: LGTM: Consistent data type update formax_user_output_sizeThe change from string to integer for
max_user_output_sizeis consistent with previous updates and aligns with the PR objectives while maintaining the existing behavior.
69-69: Consistent minor gas usage optimizationThe
gas_usedvalue has been slightly reduced from 3683 to 3682, consistent with the previous gas usage optimization.
89-89: LGTM: Consistent updates throughout the fileThe changes in these lines maintain consistency with previous updates:
max_user_output_sizevalues have been changed from string to integer (lines 89, 128).- Minor gas usage optimizations have been applied (lines 107, 148, 179).
These changes align with the PR objectives and maintain consistent behavior across all scenarios.
Also applies to: 107-107, 128-128, 148-148, 179-179
Line range hint
1-190: Overall assessment: Consistent and beneficial changesThe changes in this file consistently update the
max_user_output_sizevalues from strings to integers and apply minor gas usage optimizations across all scenarios. These updates align well with the PR objectives to refactor data types and improve efficiency.Key points:
- Data type changes enhance type safety and consistency.
- Gas usage optimizations, although minor, contribute to overall performance improvements.
- Existing behavior and test scenarios are maintained, ensuring backwards compatibility.
These changes contribute positively to the codebase's quality and efficiency.
x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (4)
37-37: Gas usage optimization noted.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4143 to 3615 indicates a significant optimization in the underlying implementation. This change aligns with the PR objectives and suggests improved performance while maintaining the same functionality.
93-93: Consistent gas usage optimization observed.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4142 to 3614 is consistent with the optimization seen in the previous scenario. This uniformity suggests a systematic improvement in the underlying implementation, which is commendable.
147-147: Systematic gas usage optimization confirmed.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4141 to 3613 in this scenario completes a consistent pattern of optimization across all three scenarios in this feature file. This systematic improvement suggests a significant enhancement in the efficiency of Prolog program consultation, particularly when interacting with CosmWasm smart contracts.Summary of gas usage improvements:
- Scenario 1: 4143 -> 3615 (12.7% reduction)
- Scenario 2: 4142 -> 3614 (12.7% reduction)
- Scenario 3: 4141 -> 3613 (12.7% reduction)
These consistent improvements, while maintaining the same functionality, represent a noteworthy optimization in the system's performance.
Line range hint
37-147: Overall positive impact on gas usage and performance.The changes in this feature file demonstrate a consistent and significant reduction in gas usage across all scenarios, with each showing a 12.7% decrease. This uniform improvement suggests a systematic optimization in the underlying implementation, likely related to the data type updates and handling improvements mentioned in the PR objectives.
These changes are particularly noteworthy because they maintain the existing functionality while enhancing performance. This optimization could lead to cost savings and improved efficiency for users interacting with Prolog programs via CosmWasm smart contracts.
Great job on these improvements! The consistency of the optimization across different scenarios is particularly impressive.
x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (2)
207-207: LGTM: Simplified limit settingThe change from
sdkmath.NewUint(uint64(n))touint64(n)aligns with the PR objectives of updating data types. This simplification improves code readability and consistency with the newuint64type for theLimitfield.
319-319: LGTM: Direct integer assignment for MaxResultCountChanging
MaxResultCountfromsdkmath.NewUint(10)to10is consistent with the PR objectives. This simplification improves code readability and aligns with the newuint64type for themax_result_countfield in theLimitsmessage.x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (8)
46-46: Optimization in gas usage for opening a resource.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4153 to 3625 indicates an optimization in the underlying implementation for opening a resource for reading. This change aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring and improving efficiency.
89-89: Consistent optimization in gas usage for reading resource content.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4153 to 3616 is consistent with the previous optimization, showing improved efficiency in reading resource content. The slight difference in gas usage compared to the previous scenario (3616 vs 3625) likely reflects the specific operations performed in this test case.
130-130: Consistent gas usage across different encoding scenarios.The
gas_usedvalue of 3616 is identical to the previous scenario, despite the additional base64 decoding in this test case. This suggests that either the base64 decoding doesn't significantly impact gas usage, or its cost has been optimized along with the other operations.
152-152: Optimized gas usage in error scenarios.The reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4140 to 3612 demonstrates that the optimization extends to error handling scenarios, such as attempting to open a non-existing resource. The slightly lower gas usage compared to successful operations (3612 vs 3616) might be due to early termination when the resource is not found.
173-173: Consistent gas usage across different error scenarios.The
gas_usedvalue of 3612 is identical to the previous error scenario, demonstrating consistency in gas consumption for different types of errors (non-existing resource vs. permission error). This suggests a uniform approach to error handling in terms of computational cost.
194-194: Uniform gas usage across various error scenarios.The consistent
gas_usedvalue of 3612 across different error scenarios (non-existing resource, writing, and appending) demonstrates a well-structured and uniform approach to error handling. This consistency is a positive indicator of efficient and predictable behavior in error cases.
215-215: Consistent gas optimization across all error scenarios.The uniform
gas_usedvalue of 3612 across all error scenarios (incorrect options, incorrect modes, and insufficient instantiation) demonstrates a comprehensive optimization of error handling. This consistency offers several benefits:
- Simplified gas estimation for users and developers.
- Predictable behavior across different types of errors.
- Potential for easier debugging and testing of error conditions.
The uniformity in gas usage suggests a well-structured error handling mechanism that treats various error types with equal efficiency.
Also applies to: 235-235, 254-254, 273-273, 292-292
Line range hint
46-292: Summary: Comprehensive gas usage optimization across all scenariosThe changes in this file demonstrate a systematic optimization of gas usage across all scenarios, including both successful operations and various error cases. Key points:
- Consistent reduction in gas usage, from around 4140-4153 to 3612-3625 gas units.
- Uniform gas cost (3612) for all error scenarios, simplifying gas estimation.
- Slight variations in gas usage for successful operations (3616-3625) reflect different complexities.
- No changes to test logic or functionality, preserving test integrity.
These optimizations align well with the PR objectives of refactoring and improving efficiency. The consistent approach suggests a well-structured implementation that should improve overall system performance and predictability.
x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (1)
19-19: Approve changes and verify gas usage reduction.The consistent reduction in
gas_usedfrom 4140 to 3612 across all scenarios indicates an optimization in the underlying implementation of thebech32_address/2predicate. This change aligns with the PR objectives of updating data types and improving query behavior.To verify the gas usage reduction:
Also applies to: 42-42, 66-66, 87-87, 112-112, 133-133, 149-149, 166-166, 189-189, 210-210, 230-230, 250-250, 270-270, 290-290, 310-310, 330-330, 350-350
✅ Verification successful
Confirm removal of
gas_used: 4140.All instances of
gas_used: 4140have been successfully removed and replaced with3612or3613inx/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the gas usage reduction in bech32_address/2 predicate implementation. # Test: Check if there are any remaining instances of gas_used: 4140 rg -i 'gas_used:\s*4140' x/logic/keeper/features/ # Test: Verify that all gas_used values are now 3612 or 3613 rg -i 'gas_used:' x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.featureLength of output: 475
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (6)
Line range hint
35-40: LGTM: Data type updates align with PR objectives.The changes to
uint64forlimit,maxResultCount,maxSize, andmaxVariablesare consistent with the PR's goal of updating data types in theLimitsmessage.
119-125: LGTM: Updated test case aligns with new behavior.The changes to this test case correctly reflect the new behavior described in the PR objectives. When the
limitexceedsmaxResultCount, the query now returns results withHasMoreset totrueinstead of throwing an error.
165-165: LGTM: Updated error message for consistency.The adjustment to the out of gas error message ensures consistency in error reporting across the codebase.
415-420: LGTM: Simplified parameter initialization.The direct assignment of values to
MaxResultCount,MaxSize, andMaxVariablesimproves code clarity and aligns with the updated data types. This change enhances readability and maintainability.
454-454: LGTM: Simplified query construction.The direct assignment of
tc.limitto theLimitfield inQueryServiceAskRequestis consistent with the updated data type and simplifies the code.
Line range hint
1-476: Overall LGTM: Comprehensive updates aligned with PR objectives.The changes in this file effectively address the PR objectives:
- Data types for
limit,maxResultCount,maxSize, andmaxVariableshave been updated touint64.- Test cases now reflect the new behavior where queries with a limit exceeding
MaxResultCountreturn results instead of an error.- Error handling and edge cases have been significantly improved with new test cases.
- Code simplification in parameter initialization and query construction enhances readability and maintainability.
These updates collectively improve the robustness and clarity of the test suite, ensuring better coverage of the updated
Askquery behavior.x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (1)
830-830: LGTM! This change aligns with the PR objectives.The modification from
math.NewUint(5)to5simplifies the code and aligns with the PR's goal of updating data types fromcosmossdk.io/math.Uinttouint64. This change doesn't affect the functionality of the test and makes the code more straightforward.x/logic/types/params.go (4)
132-134: Verify the impact of changingmath.Uinttouint64forMaxResultCount.Similar to
MaxSize, changingMaxResultCountfrommath.Uinttouint64may introduce limitations. Confirm that the new type accommodates all expected values without causing overflows.
139-141: Verify the impact of changingmath.Uinttouint64forMaxUserOutputSize.Ensure that the
uint64type forMaxUserOutputSizeis sufficient for all scenarios and that no data loss occurs due to the removal of arbitrary-precision integers.
146-148: Verify the impact of changingmath.Uinttouint64forMaxVariables.Confirm that changing
MaxVariablestouint64does not affect functionality, especially if the value could exceed the limits of a 64-bit unsigned integer.
125-127:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the impact of changing
math.Uinttouint64forMaxSize.The change from
math.Uinttouint64limitsMaxSizeto the maximum value of a 64-bit unsigned integer (2^64 - 1). Ensure that all use cases forMaxSizeremain within this range and that the arbitrary-precision capabilities ofmath.Uintare not required.Run the following script to identify any potential issues related to
MaxSizeusage:proto/logic/v1beta2/params.proto (1)
40-40: Ensure consistent handling ofuint64types across the codebaseThe fields
max_size,max_result_count,max_user_output_size, andmax_variableshave been changed fromstringtouint64. Please verify that all references to these fields throughout the codebase are updated to handleuint64appropriately, especially in serialization, deserialization, and any arithmetic operations.You can run the following script to identify any usages that may still expect these fields as
string:Also applies to: 44-44, 49-49, 53-53
✅ Verification successful
Consistent handling of
uint64types confirmedAll references to
max_size,max_result_count,max_user_output_size, andmax_variableshave been appropriately updated touint64. No lingeringstringtype usages found for these fields.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to the modified fields that may still use the old `string` type. # Check for protobuf definitions using `string` for the specified fields rg 'string\s+(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables)' proto/ # Check for any casts or conversions from or to `string` involving these fields rg -A2 '(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables).*string' x/ logic/ client/ test/ # Look for any JSON/YAML tags that might be incorrect after the type change rg '(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables).*json|yaml' proto/ x/ logic/ client/ test/Length of output: 13673
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all files that define or reference the modified fields and check for `string` type usages. # Find all protobuf files that might define the fields fd --extension=proto . | xargs rg 'string\s+(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables)' # Find all Go files that might reference the fields and check for `string` usages fd --extension=go . | xargs rg '(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables).*string' # Find all JSON/YAML tags related to the modified fields fd --extension=proto,go,yaml,json . | xargs rg '(max_size|max_result_count|max_user_output_size|max_variables).*json|yaml'Length of output: 20206
x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (4)
49-49: Update ofsolutionsLimitparameter touint64inexecutemethod aligns with type changesChanging the
solutionsLimitparameter fromsdkmath.Uinttouint64in theexecutemethod is appropriate and consistent with the overall refactoring of limit types across the codebase.
62-62: Use ofcalculateSolutionLimitinexecutemethod ensures correct solution limitingIntroducing
calculateSolutionLimitwhen callingk.queryInterpreterhelps enforce the maximum result count constraints effectively. This change enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.
77-77: Update ofsolutionsLimitparameter touint64inqueryInterpretermethodChanging the
solutionsLimitparameter touint64in thequeryInterpretermethod aligns with the data type changes and ensures consistent handling of solution limits throughout the codebase.
99-100: Simplify user output buffer initialization with direct zero comparisonThe condition now directly checks if
limits.MaxUserOutputSize > 0, replacing the previous comparison withsdkmath.ZeroUint(). This simplification is appropriate given the type change touint64and maintains the intended behavior of initializing the bounded buffer when necessary.
ccamel
force-pushed
the
refactor/logic-limits-type
branch
3 times, most recently
from
01b84c2
to
3590647
Compare
The properties `max_size`, `max_result_count`, `max_user_output_size`, and `max_variables` in the `Limits` message, the properties `weighting_factor`, `default_predicate_cost` in the `GasPolicy` message, and `cost` in the `PredicateCost` message now use _uint64_ instead of `cosmossdk.io/math.Uint`. Similarly, the `limit` property in the `QueryServiceAskRequest` message has been updated to use _uint64_. The properties `weighting_factor`, `default_predicate_cost` and `cost` in the `GasPolicy` message now use _uint64_ instead of Additionally, querying with a _limit_ higher than _MaxResultCount_ no longer results in an error. This ensures that clients still receive results while automatically adhering to the API’s limits, providing a smooth and efficient user experience.
ccamel
force-pushed
the
refactor/logic-limits-type
branch
from
3590647
to
6146f20
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go (1)
3-7: Implementation looks good, but needs test coverage.The
String()method implementation is clean and follows Go idioms. However, it currently lacks test coverage.Consider adding unit tests to verify the string representation. I can help generate the test cases if needed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 4-6: x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go#L4-L6
Added lines #L4 - L6 were not covered by testsx/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go (1)
Line range hint
58-61: Update the limit flag description to reflect new behavior.The current description mentions the
max_result_countconstraint but doesn't explain the new behavior where queries still succeed when the limit exceeds this value.cmd.Flags().Uint64Var( &limit, "limit", 1, - `limit the maximum number of solutions to return. -This parameter is constrained by the 'max_result_count' setting in the module configuration, which specifies the maximum number of results that can be requested per query.`) + `limit the maximum number of solutions to return. +If the specified limit exceeds the 'max_result_count' setting in the module configuration, the query will still succeed but return only up to max_result_count solutions.`)🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by testsx/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (2)
50-71: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for GasPolicy configuration.The test case thoroughly validates both limits and GasPolicy configurations.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the test case's purpose, particularly around the GasPolicy configuration choices:
{ + // Test case validating custom GasPolicy with specific predicate costs params: types.NewParams(
124-150: Consider using mock dependencies in nil query test.While the test correctly validates nil query handling, the keeper initialization could be improved.
Instead of passing
nilfor the dependencies, consider using the mock objects already defined in the first test case. This maintains consistency and prevents potential issues if the keeper implementation changes to use these dependencies during parameter validation:- nil, - nil, - nil, - nil) + logictestutil.NewMockAccountKeeper(ctrl), + logictestutil.NewMockAuthQueryService(ctrl), + logictestutil.NewMockBankKeeper(ctrl), + func(_ gocontext.Context) fs.FS { + return logictestutil.NewMockFS(ctrl) + })x/logic/types/params.go (1)
14-18: Add documentation for the GasPolicy parameter.The new
gasPolicyparameter should be documented to explain its purpose and impact on the system.// NewParams creates a new Params object. +// Parameters: +// - interpreter: The interpreter configuration +// - limits: The system limits configuration +// - gasPolicy: The gas consumption policy configuration func NewParams(interpreter Interpreter, limits Limits, gasPolicy GasPolicy) Params {x/logic/keeper/migrations_test.go (1)
29-115: Consider adding edge cases to the test suite.While the current test cases cover basic and custom scenarios, consider adding tests for:
- Maximum uint64 values to ensure no overflow issues
- Zero values for all numeric fields
- Boundary conditions for limits
Example additional test case:
{ params: v1beta2types.Params{ Limits: v1beta2types.Limits{ MaxSize: lo.ToPtr(sdkmath.NewUintFromString("18446744073709551615")), // max uint64 MaxResultCount: lo.ToPtr(sdkmath.NewUint(0)), // zero value MaxUserOutputSize: lo.ToPtr(sdkmath.NewUint(1)), // minimum valid value MaxVariables: lo.ToPtr(sdkmath.NewUintFromString("18446744073709551615")), // max uint64 }, }, expect: types.Params{ Limits: types.Limits{ MaxSize: 18446744073709551615, MaxResultCount: 0, MaxUserOutputSize: 1, MaxVariables: 18446744073709551615, }, }, }x/logic/module.go (1)
Line range hint
127-150: Document upgrade requirements and migration steps.This consensus-breaking change requires clear documentation for:
- Validators performing the upgrade
- Downstream applications adapting to the new uint64 limits
- Migration verification steps
Consider adding:
- Upgrade guide in docs
- Migration verification tools
- Rollback procedures (if possible)
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 127-129: x/logic/module.go#L127-L129
Added lines #L127 - L129 were not covered by testsproto/logic/v1beta3/params.proto (1)
143-144: Consider adding a cross-reference to GasPolicy documentation.The zero value behavior is consistent with GasPolicy fields. Consider adding a cross-reference to make the relationship clearer:
- // If set to 0, the value considered is 1. + // If set to 0, the value considered is 1 (consistent with GasPolicy fields).go.mod (1)
Line range hint
3-3: Invalid Go version specifiedThe Go version
1.23specified in thego.modfile is not valid. The latest stable version of Go is 1.22.Update the Go version to a valid one:
-go 1.23 +go 1.22Makefile (1)
285-285: Add validation for successful upgrade.The script should verify that the upgrade was successful before completing.
Add a verification step:
--keyring-backend test; \ mkdir -p ${DAEMON_HOME}/cosmovisor/upgrades/${TO_VERSION}/bin && cp ${CHAIN_BINARY} ${DAEMON_HOME}/cosmovisor/upgrades/${TO_VERSION}/bin; \ - wait + wait + + # Verify upgrade success + if ! $$BINARY_OLD status --home ${CHAIN_HOME} | grep -q ${TO_VERSION}; then + echo "Upgrade verification failed: Version mismatch" + exit 1 + fiapp/upgrades.go (1)
12-14: Consider defining upgrade versions as constantsCurrently, the
upgradesslice contains hardcoded version strings. Using constants for these values can improve maintainability and reduce the risk of typos or inconsistencies.For example:
+const UpgradeVersionV1100 = "v11.0.0" -var upgrades = []string{ - "v11.0.0", -} +var upgrades = []string{ + UpgradeVersionV1100, +}x/logic/keeper/migrations.go (1)
18-19: Increase test coverage for error handling scenariosThe static analysis indicates that lines 18-19, 28-29, and 35-36 are not covered by tests. These lines handle critical error paths. Consider adding unit tests to cover these scenarios to ensure robustness:
- When
bz == nil, resulting in default parameters (lines 18-19).- When
getParamsreturns an error (lines 28-29).- When
copier.Copyfails (lines 35-36).Would you like assistance in writing unit tests to cover these error handling cases?
Also applies to: 28-29, 35-36
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 18-19: x/logic/keeper/migrations.go#L18-L19
Added lines #L18 - L19 were not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (20)
docs/command/axoned_tx_logic_update-params.mdis excluded by!docs/command/**/*.mddocs/predicate/bech32_address_2.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/block_height_1.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/block_time_1.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/consult_1.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/current_output_1.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/open_3.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/open_4.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/proto/logic.mdis excluded by!docs/proto/**/*.mdx/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/params.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.gox/logic/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/logic/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (36)
- Makefile (2 hunks)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/v7/upgrade.go (0 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/params.proto (4 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/query.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/tx.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/types.proto (1 hunks)
- x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/fs/filtered/fs_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/interpreter/interpreter.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature (17 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature (3 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature (9 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature (11 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (11 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (7 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/migrations.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/migrations_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/module.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/types/params.go (4 hunks)
- x/logic/types/params_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/logic/util/pointer.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/util/pointer_test.go (0 hunks)
- x/logic/util/prolog.go (4 hunks)
- x/logic/wasm/types.go (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- app/upgrades/v7/upgrade.go
- x/logic/util/pointer_test.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- proto/logic/v1beta3/types.proto
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- x/logic/fs/filtered/fs_test.go
- x/logic/interpreter/interpreter.go
- x/logic/keeper/features/bech32_address_2.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_height_1.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/block_time_1.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/consult_1.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/current_output_1.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_3.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features/open_4.feature
- x/logic/keeper/features_test.go
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask.go
- x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go
- x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go
- x/logic/wasm/types.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
app/app.go
[warning] 819-819: app/app.go#L819
Added line #L819 was not covered by testsapp/upgrades.go
[warning] 17-23: app/upgrades.go#L17-L23
Added lines #L17 - L23 were not covered by testsx/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by testsx/logic/keeper/migrations.go
[warning] 18-19: x/logic/keeper/migrations.go#L18-L19
Added lines #L18 - L19 were not covered by tests
[warning] 28-29: x/logic/keeper/migrations.go#L28-L29
Added lines #L28 - L29 were not covered by tests
[warning] 35-36: x/logic/keeper/migrations.go#L35-L36
Added lines #L35 - L36 were not covered by testsx/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go
[warning] 4-6: x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go#L4-L6
Added lines #L4 - L6 were not covered by testsx/logic/module.go
[warning] 127-129: x/logic/module.go#L127-L129
Added lines #L127 - L129 were not covered by tests
[warning] 150-150: x/logic/module.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by testsx/logic/types/params.go
[warning] 195-198: x/logic/types/params.go#L195-L198
Added lines #L195 - L198 were not covered by testsx/logic/util/prolog.go
[warning] 36-37: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L36-L37
Added lines #L36 - L37 were not covered by tests
[warning] 39-39: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L39
Added line #L39 was not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
[warning] 53-53: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L53
Added line #L53 was not covered by tests
[warning] 82-82: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
[warning] 87-87: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L87
Added line #L87 was not covered by tests
🪛 buf
proto/logic/v1beta3/genesis.proto
5-5: import "gogoproto/gogo.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/logic/v1beta3/query.proto
5-5: import "cosmos/query/v1/query.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
proto/logic/v1beta3/tx.proto
5-5: import "cosmos/msg/v1/msg.proto": file does not exist
(COMPILE)
🔇 Additional comments (35)
x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go (1)
4-7: Verify string representations of dependent types.The method relies on
String()implementations ofInterpreterandLimits. Let's verify these implementations exist and are properly tested.✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response since I have found the necessary information about the String() implementations.
String() implementations for dependent types are properly implemented
The
Params.String()method inx/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.gorelies on:
Interpreter.String()- Implemented inx/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.pb.go:227usingproto.CompactTextString(m)Limits.String()- Implemented inx/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.pb.go:110usingproto.CompactTextString(m)Both implementations are auto-generated protobuf methods that provide standardized string representations of the types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify String() implementations exist for dependent types # Check for Interpreter.String() implementation echo "Checking Interpreter.String()..." ast-grep --pattern 'func ($$_) String() string { $$$ }' # Check for Limits.String() implementation echo "Checking Limits.String()..." rg -A 5 'func \([^)]+\) String\(\) string'Length of output: 39605
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 4-6: x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/params.go#L4-L6
Added lines #L4 - L6 were not covered by testsx/logic/util/pointer.go (2)
15-18: LGTM!The implementation is correct. Performance considerations have been tracked in issue #792.
8-12: Consider performance implications of using reflection for all zero checks.While the updated implementation provides a more uniform way to handle zero values across different types, the use of reflection through
IsZeromight impact performance in critical paths. Consider providing type-specific optimizations for common types likeuint64that are frequently used in the codebase.Let's analyze the usage patterns to understand the impact:
x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go (2)
42-42: LGTM! Type simplification looks good.The change from
sdkmath.NewUintwrapper to directuint64usage aligns with the PR objectives and simplifies the code.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by tests
42-42: Add test coverage for the query command.The modified line lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests to verify:
- Default limit behavior
- Custom limit handling
- Behavior when limit exceeds max_result_count
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the query command?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 42-42: x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go#L42
Added line #L42 was not covered by testsx/logic/types/params_test.go (3)
37-40: LGTM! Simplified numeric parameter initialization.The change from
math.NewUintto direct integer values aligns with the PR objective of usinguint64types and makes the test code more straightforward.
57-57: LGTM! Appropriate use of zero-value initialization.The empty GasPolicy initialization is correct for these error test cases since they focus on validating virtual file paths rather than gas policy settings.
Also applies to: 69-69
42-45: Consider adding validation tests for GasPolicy fields.While the GasPolicy struct is properly initialized, the test suite could benefit from additional test cases that verify:
- Validation of zero or negative values for WeightingFactor
- Validation of zero or negative values for DefaultPredicateCost
- Edge cases or boundary conditions
Let's check if there are any existing validation rules for GasPolicy:
proto/logic/v1beta3/query.proto (2)
3-3: LGTM: Version update is consistentPackage version and import paths have been correctly updated to v1beta3, maintaining consistency across the proto definitions.
Also applies to: 8-9
53-53: LGTM: Type change improves type safetyThe change from string to uint64 is more appropriate for a limit field and aligns with the PR objective to simplify numeric types. The field comment clearly documents the relationship with max_result_count.
Let's verify the consistency of this type change across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional shell scripts to better verify this type change across the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Type change to uint64 is consistently implemented
The verification shows that:
- The limit field is correctly defined as uint64 in the new proto definition
- All relevant Go code handles the limit as uint64, including:
- Query request/response types in
x/logic/types/query.pb.go- CLI commands in
x/logic/client/cli/query_ask.go- Keeper implementation in
x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go- The only remaining references to
cosmossdk.io/mathin the logic module are in the legacy v1beta2 types, which is expected for backward compatibility🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all references to the limit field have been updated # to handle uint64 instead of string or cosmossdk.io/math.Uint # Search for any remaining string-based limit handling rg -l "limit.*string.*QueryServiceAskRequest" # Search for any remaining sdkmath.Uint usage with limit rg -l "sdkmath.*Uint.*limit.*QueryServiceAskRequest"Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Cast a wider net to find any references to the limit field in proto files and Go code # Check proto files for limit field definitions and usages echo "=== Checking proto files for limit field ===" rg -p "limit.*=.*\d+" --type proto # Check Go files for limit-related code echo "=== Checking Go files for limit handling ===" rg -p "limit.*uint|Limit.*uint" --type go # Look for any remaining cosmossdk.io/math imports echo "=== Checking for remaining cosmossdk.io/math imports ===" rg -p "cosmossdk\.io/math" --type goLength of output: 6393
x/logic/util/prolog.go (3)
39-43: LGTM! Logic changes align with new requirements.The updated logic correctly implements the new behavior where queries can receive results even when the limit exceeds MaxResultCount. The count tracking and HasMore calculation are properly implemented.
Also applies to: 82-82, 87-87
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 39-39: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L39
Added line #L39 was not covered by tests
[warning] 42-43: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L42-L43
Added lines #L42 - L43 were not covered by tests
36-37: Add test coverage for modified logic.The static analysis indicates that the modified lines lack test coverage. Please add tests to cover:
- Count initialization and capacity calculation
- Limit checking logic
- Error handling with limits
- HasMore field calculation
This will ensure the new behavior is working as expected across different scenarios.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check existing test coverage for the QueryInterpreter function # Test: Look for test files and coverage rg -l 'TestQueryInterpreter'Would you like help generating comprehensive test cases for these scenarios?
Also applies to: 39-39, 42-43, 53-53, 82-82, 87-87
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 36-37: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L36-L37
Added lines #L36 - L37 were not covered by tests
27-27: LGTM! Verify consistent type usage across the codebase.The change from
sdkmath.Uinttouint64aligns with the PR objectives and simplifies the code.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a more comprehensive verification approach to check both the type changes and their usage context.
This will help us:
- Find any remaining
sdkmath.Uintusages- See the context of
uint64limit parameters- Focus specifically on prolog-related files where this change was made
The results will give us a better picture of the type transition consistency across the codebase.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Type change from
sdkmath.Uinttouint64is consistently implementedThe verification shows that:
- No remaining instances of
sdkmath.Uintwere found in the codebase- All limit-related parameters are consistently using
uint64across different components:
- Query types in
x/logic/wasm/types.go- Protobuf definitions in
proto/logic/v1beta3/query.proto- Parameter configurations in
x/logic/types/params.go- The modified prolog interpreter in
x/logic/util/prolog.goThe type change is complete and consistent throughout the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all usages of sdkmath.Uint for limits have been updated to uint64 # Test: Search for any remaining sdkmath.Uint usages in limit-related code rg -l 'sdkmath\.Uint.*[Ll]imit'Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining sdkmath.Uint usages rg "sdkmath\.Uint" -A 2 -B 2 # Search for uint64 with limit to see the converted cases rg "uint64.*[Ll]imit" -A 2 -B 2 # Search specifically in the prolog-related files fd "prolog.*\.go$" --exec rg -l "sdkmath\.Uint|uint64.*[Ll]imit" {}Length of output: 5941
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (1)
42-48: LGTM! Test case properly validates the new uint64 limits.The test case correctly reflects the transition from
cosmossdk.io/math.Uintto direct integer values for limits configuration, while also covering the default GasPolicy scenario.x/logic/types/params.go (2)
58-62: LGTM! Clean initialization of empty slices.The explicit initialization of empty slices for whitelist and blacklist is a good practice.
24-33: Verify the default values are appropriate for production use.The default values are now hardcoded:
- MaxSize: 5000
- MaxResultCount: 3
- MaxVariables: 100000
- WeightingFactor: 1
- DefaultPredicateCost: 1
Please ensure these values have been validated for production use.
x/logic/keeper/migrations_test.go (2)
1-27: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured and all are being utilized in the test implementation.
142-166: Enhance migration verification.The test should verify:
- That the old params format is no longer present in the store
- That the migration is idempotent (can be run multiple times safely)
x/logic/module.go (2)
150-150: LGTM: Version increment is appropriate.The increment of ConsensusVersion from 3 to 4 is justified as the change from
cosmossdk.io/math.Uinttouint64is a consensus-breaking change affecting state handling.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 150-150: x/logic/module.go#L150
Added line #L150 was not covered by tests
127-130:⚠️ Potential issueAdd test coverage for the store migration.
The registration of migration from v3 to v4 is a critical operation that handles the conversion of limits to uint64 format. This change requires thorough testing to ensure a smooth chain upgrade.
Let's verify the migration implementation:
Please add comprehensive test cases that:
- Verify successful migration of existing limits
- Handle edge cases (max values, zero values)
- Validate error scenarios
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 127-129: x/logic/module.go#L127-L129
Added lines #L127 - L129 were not covered by testsproto/logic/v1beta3/params.proto (3)
39-53: LGTM! Type changes improve safety and performance.The conversion from string to uint64 for numeric fields is a good improvement because it:
- Eliminates string parsing overhead
- Provides better type safety
- Has clear documentation about zero value behavior
3-3: Verify migration handling for v1beta2 to v1beta3 upgrade.The package version upgrade from v1beta2 to v1beta3 is a breaking change.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response as there's clear evidence of migration handling between v1beta2 and v1beta3:
Migration handling is properly implemented for v1beta2 to v1beta3 upgrade
The codebase shows proper migration handling through:
- Legacy v1beta2 types are preserved in
x/logic/legacy/v1beta2/types/- Migration code exists in
x/logic/keeper/migrations.gowith imports of v1beta2 types- Migration tests are implemented in
x/logic/keeper/migrations_test.go- Both versions' protobuf definitions are maintained with clear separation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for migration handling between v1beta2 and v1beta3 # Test 1: Look for migration files or handlers echo "Checking for migration handlers..." fd -e go -e proto "migration|upgrade" | grep -i "v1beta[23]" # Test 2: Check for version references in go files echo "Checking for version references..." rg "v1beta[23]" -t goLength of output: 8981
119-124: Verify zero value handling in implementation.The documentation states that zero values should be treated as 1 for both
weighting_factoranddefault_predicate_cost.✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't yield the implementation details we need. Let's search more specifically for the implementation files:
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have found the relevant implementation details:
Zero value handling is correctly implemented
The implementation shows proper handling of zero values:
- In
x/logic/types/params.go, theDefaultParams()function sets both values to 1 by default:WithWeightingFactor(1), WithDefaultPredicateCost(1)
- In
x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go, the code useslo.CoalesceOrEmpty()function to handle zero values:gasMeter := meter.WithWeightedMeter(sdkctx.GasMeter(), lo.CoalesceOrEmpty(gasPolicy.WeightingFactor, defaultWeightFactor))lo.CoalesceOrEmpty(gasPolicy.DefaultPredicateCost, defaultPredicateCost)The
lo.CoalesceOrEmpty()function ensures that when the first argument is zero/empty, it falls back to the second argument (default value), which aligns with the proto documentation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify zero value handling implementation # Test: Look for zero value handling in gas policy implementation echo "Checking gas policy implementation..." rg -A 5 "weighting_factor|default_predicate_cost" -t goLength of output: 8981
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Go files that might contain the gas policy implementation echo "Searching for gas policy implementation files..." fd -e go . x/logic/keeper x/logic/types | grep -v "\.pb\.go$" | grep -v "\.gw\.go$" echo -e "\nChecking implementation of gas policy..." rg -g '!*.pb.go' -g '!*.gw.go' "type GasPolicy|func.*GasPolicy" -A 10 -t go echo -e "\nChecking for weighting factor usage..." rg -g '!*.pb.go' -g '!*.gw.go' "weighting_factor|WeightingFactor" -A 5 -t go echo -e "\nChecking for default predicate cost usage..." rg -g '!*.pb.go' -g '!*.gw.go' "default_predicate_cost|DefaultPredicateCost" -A 5 -t goLength of output: 10875
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (8)
34-34: LGTM! Type change aligns with implementationThe change from
inttouint64for thelimitfield is appropriate as limit values should never be negative.
118-124: LGTM! Test case correctly verifies new limit handling behaviorThe test case properly validates that when
limit(2) exceedsmaxResultCount(1), the response includesHasMore: trueand returns results up tomaxResultCount, which aligns with the new behavior described in the PR objectives.
164-164: LGTM! Error message accurately reflects gas consumptionThe updated error message clearly indicates the gas consumption (11140) exceeded the limit (3000) for the specific predicate.
Line range hint
294-372: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for error handlingThe new test cases thoroughly validate error handling scenarios with different combinations of:
- Resource errors during query execution
- Various limit configurations
- Different result count expectations
414-419: LGTM! Clean parameter initializationParameter initialization correctly uses direct uint64 value assignment, aligning with the type system changes.
428-428: LGTM! Gas cost assignment is consistentGas cost assignment uses uint64 type consistently with other parameter changes.
452-452: LGTM! Query limit field assignment is correctThe limit field assignment maintains type consistency with the updated uint64 type system.
474-500: LGTM! Good defensive programming testThe new test case properly validates that the system handles nil queries gracefully with appropriate error messages.
go.mod (2)
Line range hint
1-400: Clarify status of sdkmath dependencyThe AI summary mentions removal of the
sdkmathdependency, butcosmossdk.io/mathis still listed as a requirement. Please clarify if this dependency is still needed by other parts of the codebase.Let's check the usage of this package:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining usage of sdkmath rg --type go "cosmossdk.io/math" || echo "No direct imports found"
44-44: Verify the necessity of the copier dependencyThe addition of
github.com/jinzhu/copiersuggests implementation of deep copying functionality. While this library is reliable, consider if the standard library'scopy()function or simple assignment would suffice for your use case, especially if you're only copying simple data types likeuint64.Let's check how this dependency is being used:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate new shell scripts to properly verify the usage of the copier package.
The previous script had issues with quote handling and the output showed unrelated imports. Let's try again with proper quoting and context lines to see how the copier package is actually being used in the codebase.
Let me check the specific usage context in the migrations file to make a proper assessment.
I want to see the full context of the migration code and understand the structure being copied to make a proper recommendation about whether a simpler solution could work.
The copier dependency is necessary and appropriately used
The
github.com/jinzhu/copierpackage is being used in a migrations context to copy complex nested structures between different versions of theInterpreterstruct, which contains nestedFiltertypes and complex configuration parameters. Given the structure's complexity (containing nested filters, URIs, and predicate configurations), using the standard library'scopy()or simple assignment would not suffice as it would only perform a shallow copy.The usage in the migrations code is a legitimate use case for deep copying, as it ensures all nested fields are properly copied when migrating between different versions of the parameters, maintaining data integrity during the migration process.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the copier package rg --type go "github.com/jinzhu/copier" || echo "No direct imports found" rg --type go "copier\." || echo "No usage of copier package found"Length of output: 4754
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of the copier package with proper quotes rg --type go '"github.com/jinzhu/copier"' # Search for any usage of copier package functions rg --type go -A 3 'copier\.'Length of output: 351
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get more context around the copier usage in migrations rg --type go -B 10 -A 10 'copier\.Copy' x/logic/keeper/migrations.go # Check the types involved in the migration ast-grep --pattern 'type Interpreter struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 6439
Makefile (1)
256-256: Consider the impact of reduced voting period.The voting period has been reduced from "30s" to "20s". While this might be suitable for testing, such a short period could be problematic in production environments where stakeholders need adequate time to review and vote on proposals.
Consider:
- Making the voting period configurable via environment variables
- Using different values for test and production environments
app/upgrades.go (1)
16-17:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the impact of changing function visibility
The function
RegisterUpgradeHandlershas been renamed toregisterUpgradeHandlers, making it unexported. Please ensure that this function is not required by external packages or modules. Changing its visibility could affect external consumers or parts of the codebase that rely on it.Would you like assistance in checking for external references to this function?
|
@coderabbitai pause |
✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
Implements #784 as discussed in axone-protocol/discussions/2.
max_size,max_result_count,max_user_output_size, andmax_variablesin theLimitsmessage, the propertiesweighting_factor,default_predicate_costin theGasPolicymessage, andcostin thePredicateCostmessage now use uint64 instead ofcosmossdk.io/math.Uint. Similarly, thelimitproperty in theQueryServiceAskRequestmessage has been updated to use uint64.limithigher thanMaxResultCountno longer results in an error. This ensures that clients still receive results while automatically adhering to the API’s limits, providing a smooth and efficient user experience.logicmodule from v3 to v4 has been considered to ensure that the storage of these values is still functional in the dentrite-1 network.An additional benefit is the reduced gas consumption, as the parameters being stored are smaller (see e2e tests).
Tasks
localnet migration test
$ make chain-upgrade FROM_VERSION=v10.0.0 TO_VERSION=v11.0.0 ... 2:21PM INF applying upgrade "v11.0.0" at height: 20 module=x/upgrade 2:21PM INF migrating module logic from version 3 to version 4 module=server ...Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests