Feat/predicate iterate #769
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications across multiple files, primarily enhancing the build process, mock generation, and application logic. Key changes include the addition of a mock generation command in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/predicate-iterate
branch
from
315ec2a
to
3e8433a
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #769 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 54.89% 54.98% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 73 73
Lines 2940 2966 +26
==========================================
+ Hits 1614 1631 +17
- Misses 1230 1241 +11
+ Partials 96 94 -2
|
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/predicate-iterate
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fee8a85
to
bfe7d11
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
x/logic/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
15-17: LGTM: New AuthQueryService interface added.The new
AuthQueryServiceinterface with theAccountsmethod aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides a way to query accounts, which can be used to iterate over addresses as mentioned in the PR summary.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this interface, similar to the comments for other interfaces in this file.
Line range hint
1-33: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file effectively support the transition from bulk retrieval to iterative querying of account balances:
- The new
AuthQueryServiceinterface provides a mechanism for querying accounts, enabling iteration over addresses.- Removal of
GetAccountsBalancesfromBankKeeperreinforces the move away from retrieving all balances at once.- Import changes reflect the shift in dependencies from
banktoauthtypes.These changes are consistent with the PR's goal of enhancing the handling of balance-related predicates and optimizing resource usage.
As the PR summary mentions, consider evaluating the effort required to iterate over balances as well. This could further optimize resource usage, especially for accounts with numerous balance entries.
x/logic/prolog/context.go (2)
26-35: LGTM: NewContextValuefunction implemented correctly.The new
ContextValuefunction is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. It uses generics for type-safe retrieval of context values and handles error cases appropriately.A minor suggestion for improved clarity:
Consider adding a comment explaining the
zero Vvariable:var zero V +// zero is the zero value for type V, returned when the key is not found in the context return zero, engine.ResourceError(ResourceContextValue(string(key)), env)This addition would make the purpose of the
zerovariable more explicit for future readers of the code.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 28-30: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L28-L30
Added lines #L28 - L30 were not covered by tests
[warning] 33-34: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L33-L34
Added lines #L33 - L34 were not covered by tests
28-35: Consider adding unit tests for the newContextValuefunction.The static analysis tools indicate that the new
ContextValuefunction is not covered by tests. While this doesn't necessarily indicate a problem with the implementation, adding unit tests would improve the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase.Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for the
ContextValuefunction? These tests could cover both the successful retrieval of a value and the error case when a value is not found in the context.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 28-30: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L28-L30
Added lines #L28 - L30 were not covered by tests
[warning] 33-34: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L33-L34
Added lines #L33 - L34 were not covered by testsx/logic/testutil/keeper_mocks.go (2)
17-73: Consider improving error handling and pagination.The function
MockAuthQueryServiceWithAddressesis well-implemented overall, but there are two areas for potential improvement:
Error Handling: Instead of panicking on errors, consider returning them to allow for better error management in tests.
Pagination: The current implementation using
lo.Slicemight not accurately represent real pagination behavior. Consider implementing pagination that more closely mimics the actual service.Here's a suggested refactor for error handling and pagination:
func MockAuthQueryServiceWithAddresses(mock *MockAuthQueryService, addresses []string) { mock. EXPECT(). Accounts(gomock.Any(), gomock.Any()). AnyTimes(). - DoAndReturn(func(_ context.Context, req *authtypes.QueryAccountsRequest) (*authtypes.QueryAccountsResponse, error) { + DoAndReturn(func(_ context.Context, req *authtypes.QueryAccountsRequest) (*authtypes.QueryAccountsResponse, error) { start := 0 - limit := 5 - toCursor := func(idx int) []byte { return []byte(fmt.Sprintf("%d", idx)) } - fromCursor := func(k []byte) int { - idx, err := strconv.Atoi(string(k)) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } - - return idx - } + limit := query.DefaultLimit + + if req.Pagination != nil { + if req.Pagination.Offset > 0 { + start = int(req.Pagination.Offset) + } + if req.Pagination.Limit > 0 { + limit = int(req.Pagination.Limit) + } + } - if req.Pagination != nil { - if req.Pagination.Key != nil { - start = fromCursor(req.Pagination.Key) - } - if req.Pagination.Limit != 0 { - limit = int(req.Pagination.GetLimit()) - } + end := start + limit + if end > len(addresses) { + end = len(addresses) } - accounts := lo.Map( - lo.Slice(addresses, start, start+limit), - func(acc string, _ int) *codectypes.Any { - addr, err := sdk.AccAddressFromBech32(acc) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } - accI := authtypes.ProtoBaseAccount() - err = accI.SetAddress(addr) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } + accounts := make([]*codectypes.Any, 0, end-start) + for _, acc := range addresses[start:end] { + addr, err := sdk.AccAddressFromBech32(acc) + if err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid address %s: %w", acc, err) + } - anyV, err := codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(accI) - if err != nil { - panic(err) - } + accI := authtypes.ProtoBaseAccount() + if err := accI.SetAddress(addr); err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to set address: %w", err) + } - return anyV - }) + anyV, err := codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(accI) + if err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create Any value: %w", err) + } + + accounts = append(accounts, anyV) + } return &authtypes.QueryAccountsResponse{ Accounts: accounts, Pagination: &query.PageResponse{ - NextKey: toCursor(start + 1), - Total: 0, + NextKey: nil, + Total: uint64(len(addresses)), }, }, nil }) }This refactor improves error handling by returning errors instead of panicking, and implements pagination more accurately by using offset and limit directly.
Despite these suggestions, the overall implementation is solid and well-structured.
1-83: Overall assessment: Well-implemented mock functions with minor improvement suggestions.This new file
keeper_mocks.gosuccessfully introduces mock implementations for theAuthQueryService, aligning with the PR objectives of enhancing balance-related predicate handling. The two main functions,MockAuthQueryServiceWithAddressesandMockAuthQueryServiceWithError, provide valuable tools for testing scenarios.Key points:
- The mock implementations are well-structured and use appropriate libraries (gomock, lo).
- Error scenarios are properly accounted for with
MockAuthQueryServiceWithError.- The
MockAuthQueryServiceWithAddressesfunction handles pagination and address transformation, though there's room for improvement in error handling and pagination implementation.These mocks will facilitate testing of components that depend on account queries, supporting the PR's goal of optimizing resource usage and aligning with Prolog's natural mechanisms.
Consider implementing similar mocking strategies for other keeper methods that might be used in the refactored predicates (
bank_balances,bank_spendable_balances,bank_locked_balances) to ensure comprehensive test coverage of the new lazy sequence approach.x/logic/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-93: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications to this test file are consistent with the PR objectives of enhancing the handling of balance-related predicates. The introduction of the
authQueryServicemock and the updates to theNewKeeperfunction signature support this goal.However, it's worth noting that these changes are focused on setting up the test environment. To fully validate the PR objectives:
- Consider adding specific test cases that exercise the new lazy sequence support for delayed promises in balance-related predicates.
- Ensure that the test cases cover the iteration over addresses as each solution branch is explored, as mentioned in the PR objectives.
These additions would provide more comprehensive coverage of the new functionality and help verify that the implementation meets the stated goals of the PR.
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (1)
62-62: LGTM! Consider a minor naming improvement.The addition of the AuthQueryService mock aligns well with the PR objectives. This change supports the enhanced handling of balance-related predicates as described in the PR summary.
Consider using a more descriptive variable name, such as
mockAuthQueryService, to clearly indicate that it's a mock object:-authQueryService := logictestutil.NewMockAuthQueryService(ctrl) +mockAuthQueryService := logictestutil.NewMockAuthQueryService(ctrl)x/logic/predicate/util_test.go (1)
67-91: LGTM with suggestion: Good error handling test, but consider making it more robust.This test case effectively verifies the behavior of the
Accountsfunction when encountering an error:
- Sets up a mock interface registry that always returns an error
- Checks that the function handles the error gracefully
- Verifies the returned error matches the expected one
However, there's room for improvement:
Consider making the error checking more robust by verifying the error type or using a partial match on the error message, rather than an exact string match. This would make the test less brittle in case the exact error message changes. For example:
So(result.B, ShouldBeError) So(result.B.Error(), ShouldContainSubstring, "not to unpack")x/logic/prolog/error.go (1)
90-93: LGTM! Consider adding documentation and tests.The implementation of
ResourceContextValuelooks correct and consistent with other similar functions in the file. However, there are a couple of suggestions for improvement:
- Add documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this function, similar to other functions in the file.
- Include unit tests to cover this new function, as indicated by the static analysis tool.
Here's a suggestion for documentation:
// ResourceContextValue returns a term representing the context resource with the given key. // It creates a compound term using AtomResourceContext and the provided key as an atom.Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for this function?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 91-92: x/logic/prolog/error.go#L91-L92
Added lines #L91 - L92 were not covered by testsx/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (2)
41-45: LGTM. Consider updating documentation.The addition of
types.InterfaceRegistryContextKeyto the enhanced context is a good improvement. This change aligns with the PR objectives and likely supports the new functionality for handling balance-related predicates.Consider updating the method's documentation to reflect this new addition, explaining its purpose and potential impact on the system.
Line range hint
1-290: Overall assessment: Changes look good and align with PR objectives.The modifications to the
enhanceContextandexecutemethods are well-implemented and consistent. They support the PR's goal of enhancing the handling of balance-related predicates by providing access to the interface registry. No other significant changes or issues were observed in the file.However, there are a couple of points to consider:
- As mentioned in the PR objectives, the implementation still retrieves all balances for each account at once. Consider evaluating the effort required to iterate over balances as well, which could further optimize resource usage.
- The PR objectives mention using keeper methods originally designed for the gRPC API, which introduces a minor overhead. It might be worth exploring ways to reduce this overhead in future iterations.
x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (2)
60-67: LGTM: Addition of authQueryService to testCase structThe addition of
authQueryServiceto thetestCasestruct is a good improvement, aligning with the PR objectives to enhance balance-related predicate handling. Using a mock service for authentication queries in tests is a good practice.Consider adding a comment above the
testCasestruct to briefly explain its purpose and the role of each field, especially the newly addedauthQueryService. This would improve code readability and maintainability.
Add Test Cases for Authentication Queries
The inclusion of
authQueryServicein the test setup is a positive step towards enhancing functionality. However, the current test files do not contain explicit test cases that utilizeauthQueryServiceto validate authentication queries. To ensure comprehensive coverage and reliability of the new authentication query functionality, please consider adding dedicated test cases that exercise and verify the behavior ofauthQueryService.
- Implement test scenarios that specifically use
authQueryServiceto test authentication queries.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-334: Consider adding test cases for authentication queriesThe changes to include the
authQueryServicein the test setup are good and align with the PR objectives. However, I don't see any new test cases that specifically exercise this new functionality.To ensure comprehensive test coverage for the new authentication query functionality, consider adding specific test cases. You can verify the current test coverage for authentication queries using the following command:
If the command doesn't return any results, it indicates that additional test cases for authentication queries might be beneficial.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for test cases related to authentication queries # Expected result: New test cases utilizing authQueryService rg -i 'test.*auth.*query' x/logic/keeper/Length of output: 449
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (2)
394-394: LGTM: Addition ofauthQueryServicemockThe introduction of the
authQueryServicemock enhances the testing framework to accommodate authentication-related queries, which is consistent with the PR objectives.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this mock service to improve code readability:
+// Mock auth query service for testing authentication-related queries authQueryService := logictestutil.NewMockAuthQueryService(ctrl)
400-409: LGTM: Updates tologicKeeperconstructorThe updates to the
NewKeeperfunction call, including the explicit addition ofencCfg.InterfaceRegistryandauthQueryServiceas parameters, are consistent with the PR objectives and enhance the testing setup.To improve readability, consider breaking the
NewKeeperfunction call into multiple lines:logicKeeper := keeper.NewKeeper( encCfg.Codec, encCfg.InterfaceRegistry, key, key, authtypes.NewModuleAddress(govtypes.ModuleName), accountKeeper, authQueryService, bankKeeper, func(_ gocontext.Context) fs.FS { return fsProvider }, )Makefile (1)
382-384: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of mock generation for the interface registry is a good enhancement. It aligns with the PR objectives and follows the existing pattern for mock generation.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this mock, for example:
+# Generate mock for interface registry to support testing of balance-related predicates @mockgen -source "$$(go list -f '{{.Dir}}' github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/codec/types)/interface_registry.go" \ -package testutil \ -destination x/logic/testutil/interface_registry_mocks.gox/logic/predicate/util.go (1)
94-96: Correct the function comment forLockedCoinsSortedThe comment for
LockedCoinsSortedincorrectly states that it returns "spendable coins." It should be "locked coins."Apply this diff to correct the comment:
-// LockedCoinsSorted returns the list of spendable coins for the given address, sorted by coin denomination. +// LockedCoinsSorted returns the list of locked coins for the given address, sorted by coin denomination.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
docs/predicate/bank_balances_2.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/bank_locked_balances_2.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mddocs/predicate/bank_spendable_balances_2.mdis excluded by!docs/predicate/**/*.mdgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- app/app.go (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/keeper.go (3 hunks)
- x/logic/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/bank.go (5 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (10 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/util.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/predicate/util_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/prolog/context.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/prolog/error.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (2 hunks)
- x/logic/testutil/interface_registry_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/testutil/keeper_mocks.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/types/context.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
- x/logic/util/prolog.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/logic/predicate/bank.go
[warning] 163-164: x/logic/predicate/bank.go#L163-L164
Added lines #L163 - L164 were not covered by testsx/logic/prolog/context.go
[warning] 28-30: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L28-L30
Added lines #L28 - L30 were not covered by tests
[warning] 33-34: x/logic/prolog/context.go#L33-L34
Added lines #L33 - L34 were not covered by testsx/logic/prolog/error.go
[warning] 91-92: x/logic/prolog/error.go#L91-L92
Added lines #L91 - L92 were not covered by testsx/logic/util/prolog.go
[warning] 56-57: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L56-L57
Added lines #L56 - L57 were not covered by tests
[warning] 61-61: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L61
Added line #L61 was not covered by tests
[warning] 65-73: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L65-L73
Added lines #L65 - L73 were not covered by tests
[warning] 75-77: x/logic/util/prolog.go#L75-L77
Added lines #L75 - L77 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (32)
x/logic/types/context.go (3)
7-8: LGTM: Addition of InterfaceRegistryContextKeyThe addition of
InterfaceRegistryContextKeyis well-implemented. It follows the existing naming conventions, uses theContextKeytype for type safety, and includes a clear descriptive comment. This new constant aligns with the PR objectives for enhancing the handling of balance-related predicates.
11-12: LGTM: Addition of AuthQueryServiceContextKeyThe addition of
AuthQueryServiceContextKeyis well-implemented. It maintains consistency with the existing code style, uses theContextKeytype for type safety, and includes a clear descriptive comment. This new constant supports the PR objectives for refactoring balance-related predicates.
7-12: Verify usage of new context keysThe additions of
InterfaceRegistryContextKeyandAuthQueryServiceContextKeylook good. To ensure these changes are fully integrated:
- Verify that these new context keys are being used correctly in other parts of the codebase.
- Check if any documentation needs to be updated to reflect these additions.
Run the following script to check the usage of these new context keys:
✅ Verification successful
Context Keys Usage Verified
All usages of
InterfaceRegistryContextKeyandAuthQueryServiceContextKeyhave been confirmed across the codebase. No issues found regarding their implementation or integration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of new context keys in the codebase echo "Checking usage of InterfaceRegistryContextKey:" rg --type go "InterfaceRegistryContextKey" echo "\nChecking usage of AuthQueryServiceContextKey:" rg --type go "AuthQueryServiceContextKey"Length of output: 1970
x/logic/types/expected_keepers.go (2)
7-7: LGTM: Import change aligns with new interface.The change from
banktoauthimport is consistent with the introduction of theAuthQueryServiceinterface and the removal of bank-specific methods.
Line range hint
20-26: LGTM: Removed GetAccountsBalances method from BankKeeper.The removal of the
GetAccountsBalancesmethod from theBankKeeperinterface is consistent with the PR objectives. This change supports the shift from bulk retrieval to iterative querying of account balances.Please ensure that all implementations and usages of the
BankKeeperinterface have been updated to reflect this change. Run the following script to verify:If any results are found, they may indicate places where the code needs to be updated to align with this interface change.
x/logic/prolog/context.go (1)
10-10: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import for the
typespackage is necessary and correctly placed for theContextKeytype used in the newContextValuefunction.x/logic/testutil/keeper_mocks.go (2)
3-15: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized and appropriate.The import statements are properly grouped and include all necessary packages for the implemented functionality. There are no unused imports, which is good for code cleanliness.
75-83: LGTM: Error mocking function is well-implemented.The
MockAuthQueryServiceWithErrorfunction is concise and effectively serves its purpose of mocking error scenarios for theAccountsmethod. It correctly uses gomock and provides a simple way to test error handling in the calling code.x/logic/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3)
60-60: LGTM: Addition of authQueryService mockThe introduction of the
authQueryServicemock is consistent with the PR objectives and aligns with the changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This addition will likely support the enhanced handling of balance-related predicates.
73-75: LGTM: Minor refactoring of fsProvider functionThe inline definition of the
fsProviderfunction within theNewKeepercall is a minor refactoring that doesn't change the functionality. While not directly related to the PR objectives, this change improves code readability by keeping the function definition close to its usage.
66-66: LGTM: Updates to NewKeeper function call, with a minor queryThe changes to the
NewKeeperfunction call, including the addition ofencCfg.InterfaceRegistryandauthQueryServiceas parameters, are consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.However, could you please clarify the specific need for adding
encCfg.InterfaceRegistryas a parameter? This wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives, and understanding its role would be beneficial.To verify the consistency of these changes across the codebase, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 71-71
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Updates to NewKeeper function call, with a minor query
The changes to the
NewKeeperfunction call, including the addition ofencCfg.InterfaceRegistryandauthQueryServiceas parameters, are consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary.However, could you please clarify the specific need for adding
encCfg.InterfaceRegistryas a parameter? This wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives, and understanding its role would be beneficial.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent updates to NewKeeper calls across the codebase # Search for NewKeeper function calls echo "Searching for NewKeeper function calls:" rg --type go "NewKeeper\(" -A 10Length of output: 16164
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_params_test.go (3)
75-77: LGTM! Improved code formatting.The adjustment to the fsProvider function's indentation enhances code readability without affecting functionality.
62-77: Overall changes align well with PR objectives.The updates to the test setup and keeper initialization in this file effectively support the enhanced handling of balance-related predicates, as outlined in the PR objectives. The addition of the AuthQueryService mock and the corresponding updates to the NewKeeper call are particularly noteworthy.
These changes improve the test coverage and ensure that the new functionality related to balance predicates is properly tested. The modifications are well-implemented and contribute to the overall goal of optimizing resource usage through iterative address handling.
68-68: LGTM! Verify NewKeeper method signature.The updates to the NewKeeper call, including the addition of
encCfg.InterfaceRegistryandauthQueryService, are consistent with the PR objectives and the earlier mock creation.Please ensure that the
NewKeepermethod signature in the actual implementation matches these changes. Run the following script to verify:Also applies to: 73-73
x/logic/predicate/util_test.go (3)
1-24: LGTM: Imports and package declaration are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are well-organized and relevant for testing the
Accountsfunction in the Axone protocol. They include necessary testing libraries (gomock, goconvey), Cosmos SDK packages, and Axone-specific imports.
26-40: LGTM: Comprehensive test setup and mock configuration.The test setup is well-structured and follows best practices for testing Cosmos SDK modules:
- Uses
goconveyfor BDD-style testing- Sets up mock controller and auth query service
- Configures SDK's Bech32 prefix
- Prepares encoding config and state store
This setup provides a controlled environment for testing the
Accountsfunction.
41-65: LGTM: Thorough testing of the happy path scenario.This test case effectively verifies the behavior of the
Accountsfunction with a properly mocked context:
- Checks that all expected addresses are returned in the correct order
- Verifies that
next()returnsfalseafter all addresses have been iterated- Uses an efficient loop structure to test multiple calls to
next()The test provides good coverage of the expected behavior of the
Accountsfunction.x/logic/prolog/error.go (1)
90-93: Verify the usage of ResourceContextValue in the context of balance predicate refactoring.While this new function looks good, it's not directly related to the balance predicate refactoring mentioned in the PR objectives. Could you please clarify how this function is intended to be used in the context of the balance-related changes?
To help understand the usage of this new function, let's search for its occurrences in the codebase:
This will help us verify if and how the function is being used in the refactored balance predicates or other related code.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 91-92: x/logic/prolog/error.go#L91-L92
Added lines #L91 - L92 were not covered by testsx/logic/keeper/interpreter.go (1)
Line range hint
52-52: LGTM. Consistent use of enhanced context.The use of
k.enhanceContext(ctx)ensures that the new interpreter has access to all necessary context values, including the newly added interface registry. This change is consistent with the modifications in theenhanceContextmethod and aligns with the PR objectives.x/logic/keeper/features_test.go (1)
295-307: LGTM: Inclusion of authQueryService in NewKeeper callThe addition of
tc.authQueryServiceto theNewKeeperfunction call is correct and consistent with the changes made to thetestCasestruct. This modification ensures that the mock authentication query service is properly injected into the keeper during test setup, allowing for comprehensive testing of scenarios involving authentication queries.x/logic/testutil/interface_registry_mocks.go (4)
17-52: LGTM: MockAnyUnpacker implementationThe MockAnyUnpacker implementation follows the standard gomock pattern and correctly mocks the AnyUnpacker interface. The implementation includes a constructor, EXPECT method, and UnpackAny method, which are all correctly implemented.
54-248: LGTM: MockInterfaceRegistry implementationThe MockInterfaceRegistry implementation is comprehensive and correctly mocks all methods of the InterfaceRegistry interface. It follows the standard gomock pattern and includes the necessary mustEmbedInterfaceRegistry method for interface embedding.
250-285: LGTM: MockUnpackInterfacesMessage implementationThe MockUnpackInterfacesMessage implementation correctly mocks the UnpackInterfacesMessage interface. It follows the standard gomock pattern and includes all necessary methods.
1-285: LGTM: Generated mock implementationsThis file contains correctly generated mock implementations for AnyUnpacker, InterfaceRegistry, and UnpackInterfacesMessage interfaces. The mocks follow the standard gomock pattern and appear to be complete and correct. These mock implementations will be useful for unit testing components that depend on these interfaces.
A few points to note:
- This file is generated and should not be manually edited.
- The mocks cover all methods of the respective interfaces.
- The implementation includes necessary methods for gomock functionality (EXPECT, constructors).
To ensure the mocks are up-to-date with the latest interface definitions, run the following command:
x/logic/keeper/grpc_query_ask_test.go (2)
Line range hint
1-1: LGTM: Removal ofbanktypesimport and associated test caseThe removal of the
banktypesimport and the associated test case for bank balances aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring balance-related predicates. This change effectively streamlines the test suite by removing unnecessary dependencies.
Line range hint
1-489: Overall assessment: Changes enhance test setup and align with PR objectivesThe modifications to this test file effectively support the PR's goal of refactoring balance-related predicates and enhancing authentication-related query handling. The removal of unnecessary dependencies, addition of the
authQueryServicemock, and updates to thelogicKeeperconstructor collectively improve the test suite's focus and coverage.These changes contribute to a more streamlined and targeted testing approach, which should facilitate easier maintenance and future enhancements of the logic module.
go.mod (1)
79-79: Approved: Crucial update for PR objectivesThe update to the Prolog interpreter dependency is essential for implementing the lazy sequence support for delayed promises, as mentioned in the PR objectives. This change aligns well with the goal of optimizing the handling of balance-related predicates.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Compatibility Issues Found
The dependency update to
github.com/ichiban/prologis correctly replaced bygithub.com/axone-protocol/prolog. All relevant files continue to reference the original import path, and thego.modreplacement ensures that the new Prolog interpreter is utilized without introducing compatibility issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the Prolog interpreter update # Test: Check if there are any compatibility issues or errors related to the Prolog interpreter rg -i 'prolog|ichiban' --type go -C 5Length of output: 116930
x/logic/keeper/keeper.go (2)
19-29: Addition ofinterfaceRegistryandauthQueryServiceenhances theKeeperstructThe inclusion of
interfaceRegistry cdctypes.InterfaceRegistryandauthQueryService types.AuthQueryServiceinto theKeeperstruct increases the modularity and potential functionality of the module. This allows for better interface handling and authorization queries within the keeper logic.
43-51: Initialization of new fields inNewKeeperis correctThe new fields
interfaceRegistryandauthQueryServiceare properly initialized within theNewKeeperfunction, ensuring that theKeeperinstance is correctly set up with all necessary dependencies.x/logic/testutil/expected_keepers_mocks.go (1)
53-90: LGTM!The implementation of
MockAuthQueryServicefollows standardgomockpatterns and correctly mocks theAuthQueryServiceinterface.x/logic/predicate/bank_test.go (1)
556-812:TestAccountfunction enhances test coverageThe newly added
TestAccountfunction provides comprehensive test cases for theaccountpredicate, covering various scenarios, including successful queries and error conditions.app/app.go (1)
571-571: EnsureinterfaceRegistryis correctly integratedThe addition of
app.interfaceRegistryto theNewKeeperfunction suggests a need forinterfaceRegistrywithin the Logic Keeper. Verify thatinterfaceRegistryis required and properly utilized inside the Logic Keeper to manage interfaces as intended.
|
@coderabbitai pause |
✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
…xt value retrieval
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/predicate-iterate
branch
from
bfe7d11
to
42f6037
Compare
|
@coderabbitai resolve I’ve applied the changes we talked about. |
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/predicate-iterate
branch
from
42f6037
to
5027940
Compare
ccamel
force-pushed
the
feat/predicate-iterate
branch
from
5027940
to
f7dbb4c
Compare
This PR leverages the lazy sequence support for delayed promises introduced in axone-protocol/prolog#10 to refactor the balance-related predicates in the
logicmodule.Previously, the implementation fetched all addresses from the blockchain at once, which risked failing due to gas limits. The new approach iterates over addresses as each solution branch is explored, aligning better with Prolog’s natural mechanisms and optimizing resource usage.
Implementation Notes
Test
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AuthQueryServicefor enhanced account query capabilities.AuthQueryService.InterfaceRegistryandAuthQueryService.Improvements
QueryInterpreterfunction.Bug Fixes
Documentation