Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Airflow to 2.5.3 and EKS to 1.26 #230

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023

Conversation

jagpk
Copy link
Contributor

@jagpk jagpk commented Jun 28, 2023

What does this PR do?

🛑 Please open an issue first to discuss any significant work and flesh out details/direction - we would hate for your time to be wasted.
Consult the CONTRIBUTING guide for submitting pull-requests.

Apache Airflow blueprint upgrade to EKS 1.26
Apache Airflow Helm chart upgrade 1.90 and application to 2.5.3
Airflow Nodes and Pods configured to use Secondary CIDR range
Using latest EKS Blueprints add-ons module
Using local Data Add-ons module
Added example to run Spark Job on EKS on using Airflow SparkKubernetesOperator

Motivation

Upgrade Apache Airflow to 2.5.3 and add an example DAG to run Spark Job on EKS on using Airflow SparkKubernetesOperator

More

  • Yes, I have tested the PR using my local account setup (Provide any test evidence report under Additional Notes)
  • Mandatory for new blueprints. Yes, I have added a example to support my blueprint PR
  • Mandatory for new blueprints. Yes, I have updated the website/docs or website/blog section for this feature
  • Yes, I ran pre-commit run -a with this PR. Link for installing pre-commit locally

For Moderators

  • E2E Test successfully complete before merge?

Additional Notes

@jagpk jagpk temporarily deployed to DoEKS Test June 28, 2023 13:50 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jagpk jagpk marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2023 14:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@vara-bonthu vara-bonthu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants