docs: Clarify NodePool disruption budgets impact on drift reconciliation #7483
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #7036
Description
Clarify that NodePool disruption budgets can prevent NodeClaim termination when the reason is drift. Expiration is verified as unaffected by disruption budgets.
How was this change tested?
Four NodePools were created with a combination of budgets with nodes set to 0 or 10% and with reasons let unspecified, reasons set to Empty only and reasons set to Drifted only. NodePool disruption budgets with nodes set to 0 and without reasons given or with the reason Drifted given prevented nodeclaim termination after changing the AMI in the underlying EC2NodeClass. As an example the following budgets would prevent nodeclaim termination between 12AM - 12PM UTC for any reason, nodeclaim termination because of drift anytime and would allow nodeclaim termination when empty for 10% of the nodepool at a time.
Does this change impact docs?
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.