Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: svc package should apply override when static site #4952

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 5, 2023

Conversation

iamhopaul123
Copy link
Contributor

currently override doesn't get applied to svc package output when svc type is static site. This PR fixes this issue.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the Apache 2.0 License.

@iamhopaul123 iamhopaul123 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 1, 2023 18:41
@iamhopaul123 iamhopaul123 requested review from huanjani and removed request for a team June 1, 2023 18:41
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 1, 2023

🍕 Here are the new binary sizes!

Name New size (kiB) size (kiB) Delta (%)
macOS (amd) 50748 50748 ❤️ 0.00
macOS (arm) 50936 50952 ❤️ -0.03
linux (amd) 44676 44676 ❤️ 0.00
linux (arm) 43012 43012 ❤️ 0.00
windows (amd) 41544 41548 ❤️ -0.01

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #4952 (80fd1ff) into mainline (cb21a39) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           mainline    #4952   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     70.15%   70.15%           
=========================================
  Files           289      289           
  Lines         41697    41695    -2     
  Branches        285      285           
=========================================
- Hits          29251    29250    -1     
+ Misses        11039    11038    -1     
  Partials       1407     1407           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/pkg/cli/deploy/static_site.go 50.72% <50.00%> (+0.72%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants