Issue #547: Field level POJO accessors #1051
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Immutable entity support (#547) - I could see using a pattern where-in the domain entity is immutable for "store" behavior. Although, it seems unlikely as the predominate case as I'd likely have some form of transfer object to marshal state to/from the DB where-in I have setters/getters.
Just an option for an implementation that solves this concern as I myself might want to do something similar in some of our use-cases.
Thought this was an interesting problem to solve, here's one possible implementation. Might consider re-using reflectutils rather than directly using java.lang.*... Also might not want to invoke field.set when setter not available...
Tests are needed by this implementation, willing to add them if this is worthy of eventually merging.