Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Rename EncryptionSdk Dafny module name #707

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

rishav-karanjit
Copy link
Member

@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit commented Dec 5, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

  • Change the Dafny name for EncryptionSdk client to ESDK.

  • Both Go and Python will reference every Local Service client module name as the localService trait's sdkId value. Old PR in MPL for same issue: chore: Rename AtomicPrimitives Dafny module name aws-cryptographic-material-providers-library#589.

  • This changes EncryptionSdk' Dafny name to align with its localService trait sdkId value.
    (There is no change for Rust/NET compiled code here because this module uses an extern in those languages.)

Squash/merge commit message, if applicable:

chore: Rename EncryptionSdk Dafny module name

How did I test this?
In the CI.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 22:12
@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 22:12
This reverts commit bed53f4.
@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit marked this pull request as draft December 5, 2024 22:40
@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 23:39
Copy link
Contributor

@seebees seebees left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rishav-karanjit rishav-karanjit merged commit 689624d into mainline Dec 10, 2024
57 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants