-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for --sse aws:kms and --sse-c #1623
Merged
+1,010
−148
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4f798bf
Add SSE-C and SSE-KMS support to s3 subcommands
0xkag 603cdac
Initial refactoring of s3 sse and sse-c params
kyleknap 5b31321
Port integration tests for sse-c and sse kms
kyleknap 4265b07
Add functional tests for sse kms key ids
kyleknap 66aebd4
Add some validation unit tests
kyleknap 0f1049c
Add some tests for sse and sse-c flags
kyleknap f218580
Cleaned up some of the changes after review
kyleknap 1c3b78f
Add unit test s3v4 and kms
kyleknap 7f08d99
Refactor the request param mappings
kyleknap 6dc579f
Add tests for mapping sse and sse-c params
kyleknap f95d08f
Add to the RequestParamsMapper docstring
kyleknap f0bb239
Add feature to CHANGELOG
kyleknap File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to move page_size in the request_parameters dict with an entry for
ListObjects
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe? If I add it, I will probably will want to break the
BucketLister
interface to userequest_parameters
in lieu of the current arguments it takes. How about I addpage_size
torequest_parameters
whenever we decide that we need to userequest_parameters
because of a needed extra request parameter forListObjects
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok sounds good.