Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ec2-alpha): adding imports for SubnetV2 and VpcV2(WIP) #31765
feat(ec2-alpha): adding imports for SubnetV2 and VpcV2(WIP) #31765
Changes from 7 commits
9572a62
52c087c
4910b6f
34fdfb3
e1b038c
00eebb9
13d1458
6ec70f6
7c47a49
04d02f4
f80fefa
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what is the value of providing the route table id? if it is needed, is it better to provide the route table object ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it will be used to add routes when attaching gateways, since routeTable interface only has the routeTableId as the property, i think just providing the Id should be enough to modify the class field using routetable id
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
honestly, I do not have a strong opinion about it. The only thing I have in mind is passing an object will give us and customers other options to create the route table, and do more logic by invoking other functions.
In general in CDK, we prefer using strong typed Objects more than Ids.