-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(codepipeline): revert "cannot deploy pipeline stack with crossAccountKeys twice" #20427
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ccountKeys twice"
Chriscbr
changed the title
chore(codepipeline): revert "cannot deploy pipeline stack with crossAccountKeys twice
chore(codepipeline): revert "cannot deploy pipeline stack with crossAccountKeys twice"
May 19, 2022
MrArnoldPalmer
approved these changes
May 19, 2022
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Chriscbr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2022
…ccountKeys twice" (#20427) This PR fails in CDK v2 because the added unit tests that use `testFutureBehavior` fail on the CDK v2 branch. I believe they're failing because the `testFutureBehavior` utility function was written before CDK v2 was released, and so it automatically discards all feature flags - which should not be happening for new feature flags. I'm not sure what the best fix for this is so I'm just reverting it for the time being to unblock the release. Test logs: <details> ``` FAIL test/pipeline.test.js (12.04 s) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with stack name instead of ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-pipeline-0a412eb5 but received alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:500:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with generated stack name when stack name is undefined and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-pipelinestack-pipeline-9db740af but received alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:525:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with stack name and nested stack ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyDF448A3D", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-nestedpipelinestack-actualpipeline-23a98110 but received alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:552:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with generated stack name and nested stack ID when stack name is undefined and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyDF448A3D", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-toplevelstack-nestedpipelinestack-actualpipeline-3161a537 but received alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:581:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is properly shortened to 256 characters when stack name is too long and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toolongactualpipelinewithextrasuperlongnamethatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestackalsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheendc9bb503e", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineWithExtraSuperLongNameThatWillNeedToBeShortenedDueToTheAlsoVerySuperExtraLongNameOfTheStackAlsoWithSomeDifferentCharactersAddedToTheEndArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyABD1BD7F", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-needstobeshortenedduetothelengthofthisabsurdnamethatnooneshouldusebutitstillmighthappensowemusttestfohatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestack-alsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheend-384b9343 but received alias/codepipeline-toolongactualpipelinewithextrasuperlongnamethatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestackalsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheendc9bb503e at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:609:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict when the stack ID is the same and pipeline ID is the same and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidpipeline32fb88b3", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-1-pipeline-b09fefee but received alias/codepipeline-stackidpipeline32fb88b3 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:643:34) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict for nested stacks when pipeline ID is the same and nested stacks have the same ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidnestedpipelineid3e91360a", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PIPELINEIDArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyE292C50C", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-1-nested-pipeline-id-c8c9f252 but received alias/codepipeline-stackidnestedpipelineid3e91360a at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:697:47) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict for nested stacks when in the same stack but nested stacks have different IDs when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidfirstpipelineid5abca693", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PIPELINEIDArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyE292C50C", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-1-first-pipeline-id-3c59cb88 but received alias/codepipeline-stackidfirstpipelineid5abca693 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:749:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ``` </details> ---- * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
4 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2022
… passing container port for target group port (#20284)" (#20430) This reverts #20284 since its tests fail to pass in CDK v2, blocking the next CDK release. The root cause of failure looks as though it may be the same as #20427 - I've included the test logs below: <details> ``` @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: FAIL test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.js (11.703 s) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › Fargate networkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 1 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:709:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › test Fargate multinetworkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 2 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:823:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ``` </details> ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Chriscbr
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2022
… passing container port for target group port (#20284)" (#20430) This reverts #20284 since its tests fail to pass in CDK v2, blocking the next CDK release. The root cause of failure looks as though it may be the same as #20427 - I've included the test logs below: <details> ``` @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: FAIL test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.js (11.703 s) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › Fargate networkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 1 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:709:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › test Fargate multinetworkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 2 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:823:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ``` </details> ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
wphilipw
pushed a commit
to wphilipw/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2022
…ccountKeys twice" (aws#20427) This PR fails in CDK v2 because the added unit tests that use `testFutureBehavior` fail on the CDK v2 branch. I believe they're failing because the `testFutureBehavior` utility function was written before CDK v2 was released, and so it automatically discards all feature flags - which should not be happening for new feature flags. I'm not sure what the best fix for this is so I'm just reverting it for the time being to unblock the release. Test logs: <details> ``` FAIL test/pipeline.test.js (12.04 s) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with stack name instead of ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-pipeline-0a412eb5 but received alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:500:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with generated stack name when stack name is undefined and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-pipelinestack-pipeline-9db740af but received alias/codepipeline-pipelinestackpipeline9db740af at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:525:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with stack name and nested stack ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyDF448A3D", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-nestedpipelinestack-actualpipeline-23a98110 but received alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:552:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is named with generated stack name and nested stack ID when stack name is undefined and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyDF448A3D", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-toplevelstack-nestedpipelinestack-actualpipeline-3161a537 but received alias/codepipeline-toplevelstacknestedpipelinestackactualpipeline3161a537 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:581:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias is properly shortened to 256 characters when stack name is too long and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-toolongactualpipelinewithextrasuperlongnamethatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestackalsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheendc9bb503e", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "ActualPipelineWithExtraSuperLongNameThatWillNeedToBeShortenedDueToTheAlsoVerySuperExtraLongNameOfTheStackAlsoWithSomeDifferentCharactersAddedToTheEndArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyABD1BD7F", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-needstobeshortenedduetothelengthofthisabsurdnamethatnooneshouldusebutitstillmighthappensowemusttestfohatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestack-alsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheend-384b9343 but received alias/codepipeline-toolongactualpipelinewithextrasuperlongnamethatwillneedtobeshortenedduetothealsoverysuperextralongnameofthestackalsowithsomedifferentcharactersaddedtotheendc9bb503e at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:609:33) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict when the stack ID is the same and pipeline ID is the same and feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidpipeline32fb88b3", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PipelineArtifactsBucketEncryptionKey01D58D69", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-1-pipeline-b09fefee but received alias/codepipeline-stackidpipeline32fb88b3 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:643:34) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict for nested stacks when pipeline ID is the same and nested stacks have the same ID when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidnestedpipelineid3e91360a", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PIPELINEIDArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyE292C50C", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-1-nested-pipeline-id-c8c9f252 but received alias/codepipeline-stackidnestedpipelineid3e91360a at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:697:47) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ● › cross account key alias name tests › cross account key alias names do not conflict for nested stacks when in the same stack but nested stacks have different IDs when feature flag is enabled Template has 1 resources with type AWS::KMS::Alias, but none match as expected. The closest result is: { "Type": "AWS::KMS::Alias", "Properties": { "AliasName": "alias/codepipeline-stackidfirstpipelineid5abca693", "TargetKeyId": { "Fn::GetAtt": [ "PIPELINEIDArtifactsBucketEncryptionKeyE292C50C", "Arn" ] } }, "UpdateReplacePolicy": "Delete", "DeletionPolicy": "Delete" } with the following mismatches: Expected alias/codepipeline-actual-stack-name-1-first-pipeline-id-3c59cb88 but received alias/codepipeline-stackidfirstpipelineid5abca693 at /Properties/AliasName (using objectLike matcher) 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); 84 | if (matchError) { > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); | ^ 86 | } 87 | } 88 | at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) at fn (test/pipeline.test.ts:749:46) at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ``` </details> ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
wphilipw
pushed a commit
to wphilipw/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2022
… passing container port for target group port (aws#20284)" (aws#20430) This reverts aws#20284 since its tests fail to pass in CDK v2, blocking the next CDK release. The root cause of failure looks as though it may be the same as aws#20427 - I've included the test logs below: <details> ``` @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: FAIL test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.js (11.703 s) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › Fargate networkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 1 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:709:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: â—� When Network Load Balancer › test Fargate multinetworkloadbalanced construct uses custom Port for target group when feature flag is enabled @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Template has 2 resources with type AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup, but none match as expected. @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: The closest result is: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Type": "AWS::ElasticLoadBalancingV2::TargetGroup", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Properties": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Port": 80, @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Protocol": "TCP", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "TargetType": "ip", @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "VpcId": { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: "Ref": "VPCB9E5F0B4" @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: with the following mismatches: @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: Expected 81 but received 80 at /Properties/Port (using objectLike matcher) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 83 | const matchError = hasResourceProperties(this.template, type, props); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 84 | if (matchError) { @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: > 85 | throw new Error(matchError); @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: | ^ @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 86 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 87 | } @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: 88 | @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Template.hasResourceProperties (../assertions/lib/template.ts:85:13) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at fn (test/fargate/load-balanced-fargate-service-v2.test.ts:823:31) @aws-cdk/aws-ecs-patterns: at Object.<anonymous> (../../../tools/@aws-cdk/cdk-build-tools/lib/feature-flag.ts:34:35) ``` </details> ---- ### All Submissions: * [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features * [ ] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/master/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [ ] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fails in CDK v2 because the added unit tests that use
testFutureBehavior
fail on the CDK v2 branch. I believe they're failing because thetestFutureBehavior
utility function was written before CDK v2 was released, and so it automatically discards all feature flags - which should not be happening for new feature flags. I'm not sure what the best fix for this is so I'm just reverting it for the time being to unblock the release.Test logs:
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
yarn integ
to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.yarn integ
without--dry-run
)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license