tidy-up-the-action

[sharlotta93]

PR Type

enhancement, bug fix

---

Description

• Simplified the handling of measurements by removing the omitBy function and ensuring createMeasurement returns an empty array instead of undefined.
• Refactored the creation of the body object to directly include measurements, improving code clarity and efficiency.
• Updated field labels in the configuration to include abbreviations, enhancing clarity.
• Removed the length restriction on measurement arrays in the AddVitalsInputSchema, allowing for more flexible input.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	addVitals.ts Simplify measurement handling and refactor body object creation extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts Removed the omitBy function to simplify measurement handling. Changed createMeasurement to return an empty array instead of undefined. Refactored the body object creation to directly include measurements. +9/-15    fields.ts Update field labels with abbreviations                                      extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/config/fields.ts Updated labels to include abbreviations for clarity. +7/-7
Bug fix	vitals.ts Remove length restriction on measurement arrays                    extensions/elation/types/vitals.ts Removed length restriction on measurement arrays. +0/-11

---

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Code Clarity The refactoring of the body object construction in the addVitals function might introduce bugs due to the direct assignment of fields without checking their existence or validity. This change could lead to runtime errors if fields are undefined. Schema Change The removal of the .length(1) constraint from the AddVitalsInputSchema for various measurements allows multiple entries where previously only one was expected. This change could lead to unexpected behavior if the API or other parts of the system rely on these fields having only one item.

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Enhance robustness by adding error handling for the API call Add error handling for the API call to manage exceptions or failed requests gracefully. extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [84] -const { id } = await api.addVitals(body) +try { + const { id } = await api.addVitals(body) + await onComplete({ + ... + }); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to add vitals:', error); + // Handle error appropriately +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding error handling for the API call is crucial for robustness and reliability. It ensures that any exceptions or failures are gracefully managed, improving the overall error management in the application.	9
Possible bug	Improve the reliability of numeric value checks by using direct comparison Replace the use of isEmpty for checking numeric values with a direct comparison to undefined or null as isEmpty is generally used for objects, arrays, or strings and might not behave as expected for numeric types. extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [22] -if (value !== undefined && !isEmpty(value)) { +if (value !== undefined && value !== null) { Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue with using isEmpty for numeric values, which can lead to incorrect behavior. Replacing it with a direct comparison improves the reliability of the condition.	8
Possible issue	Ensure proper handling of potential undefined values in the request payload Ensure that the properties visit_note and non_visit_note in the body object are handled correctly for undefined values to avoid sending undefined as part of the request payload. extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [64-65] -visit_note: fields?.visitNoteId, -non_visit_note: fields?.nonVisitNoteId, +visit_note: fields.visitNoteId || null, +non_visit_note: fields.nonVisitNoteId || null, Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion ensures that undefined values are not sent in the API request, which could lead to errors or unintended behavior. Using null instead when values are undefined is a good practice in API requests.	7
Enhancement	Prevent sending empty measurements to the API by filtering them out Consider reintroducing the removal of empty measurements before sending the API request to avoid sending unnecessary data and potentially causing errors with the API. extensions/elation/actions/addVitals/addVitals.ts [61] +const measurements = { + height: createMeasurement(fields.height, fields.heightNote), + ... +}; +const validMeasurements = omitBy(measurements, isEmpty); const body: AddVitalsInputType = { patient: fields.patientId, practice: fields.practiceId, ... + ...validMeasurements, +}; Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Filtering out empty measurements before sending them to the API is a useful enhancement. It prevents unnecessary data transmission and potential errors, aligning with the previous implementation that was removed.	6