-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 699
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P-Chain SDK Gossip #2487
Merged
Merged
P-Chain SDK Gossip #2487
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joshua-kim
force-pushed
the
pchain-gossip
branch
from
December 14, 2023 19:53
1cc94e3
to
82b8655
Compare
joshua-kim
force-pushed
the
pchain-gossip
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 14, 2023 22:01
6fbfa62
to
de4477f
Compare
joshua-kim
requested review from
abi87,
danlaine and
StephenButtolph
as code owners
December 14, 2023 22:08
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
abi87
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
joshua-kim
force-pushed
the
pchain-gossip
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 18, 2023 12:51
569f316
to
6bdde41
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we wanted to start merging this stuff in - we could probably factor out the test struct exporting into a separate PR and immediately merge that.
joshua-kim
force-pushed
the
pchain-gossip
branch
from
December 19, 2023 23:32
5331e87
to
60a6ef3
Compare
joshua-kim
force-pushed
the
pchain-gossip
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 20, 2023 00:16
67e261d
to
60325c6
Compare
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kim <[email protected]>
joshua-kim
commented
Dec 23, 2023
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kim <[email protected]>
StephenButtolph
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2023
dhrubabasu
reviewed
Dec 23, 2023
dhrubabasu
reviewed
Dec 23, 2023
dhrubabasu
reviewed
Dec 23, 2023
Co-authored-by: Dhruba Basu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stephen Buttolph <[email protected]>
dhrubabasu
reviewed
Dec 23, 2023
dhrubabasu
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🏆
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
Adds SDK transaction gossip to the P-Chain
How this works
See above
This is very similar to #2490, some invariants in the mempool change to be more close to the X-Chain's implementation (see unit test changes for reference).
How this was tested
Pending