Fix typos

crates/pallet-domains/src/block_tree.rs

@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ pub(crate) fn prune_receipt<T: Config>(
     // If the pruned ER is the operator's `latest_submitted_er` for this domain, it means either:
     //
     // - All the ER the operator submitted for this domain are confirmed and pruned, so the operator
-    //   can't be targetted by fraud proof later unless it submit other new ERs.
+    //   can't be targeted by fraud proof later unless it submit other new ERs.
     //
     // - All the bad ER the operator submitted for this domain are pruned and the operator is already
     //   slashed, so wwe don't need `LatestSubmittedER` to determine if the operator is pending slash.

crates/pallet-domains/src/tests.rs

@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ fn test_basic_fraud_proof_processing() {
 
             for block_number in bad_receipt_at..=head_domain_number {
                 if block_number == bad_receipt_at {
-                    // The targetted ER should be removed from the block tree
+                    // The targeted ER should be removed from the block tree
                     assert!(BlockTree::<Test>::get(domain_id, block_number).is_none());
                 } else {
                     // All the bad ER's descendants should be marked as pending to prune and the submitter

crates/sp-domains-fraud-proof/src/fraud_proof.rs

@@ -320,13 +320,13 @@ pub struct FraudProof<Number, Hash, DomainHeader: HeaderT, MmrHash> {
     pub domain_id: DomainId,
     /// Hash of the bad receipt this fraud proof targeted
     pub bad_receipt_hash: HeaderHashFor<DomainHeader>,
-    /// The MMR proof for the consensus state root that used to verify the storage proof
+    /// The MMR proof for the consensus state root that is used to verify the storage proof
     ///
-    /// It is set `None` if the specific fraud proof variant doesn't contains storage proof
+    /// It is set `None` if the specific fraud proof variant doesn't contain a storage proof
     pub maybe_mmr_proof: Option<ConsensusChainMmrLeafProof<Number, Hash, MmrHash>>,
     /// The domain runtime code storage proof
     ///
-    /// It is set `None` if the specific fraud proof variant doesn't required domain runtime code
+    /// It is set `None` if the specific fraud proof variant doesn't require domain runtime code
     /// or the required domain runtime code is available from the current runtime state.
     pub maybe_domain_runtime_code_proof: Option<DomainRuntimeCodeAt<Number, Hash, MmrHash>>,
     /// The specific fraud proof variant
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ pub struct InvalidStateTransitionProof {
 /// Fraud proof for the valid bundles in `ExecutionReceipt::inboxed_bundles`
 #[derive(Clone, Debug, Decode, Encode, Eq, PartialEq, TypeInfo)]
 pub struct ValidBundleProof<Number, Hash, DomainHeader: HeaderT> {
-    /// The targetted bundle with proof
+    /// The targeted bundle with proof
     pub bundle_with_proof: OpaqueBundleWithProof<Number, Hash, DomainHeader, Balance>,
 }