Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade node-forge from 0.10.0 to 1.0.0 #93

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@snyk-bot snyk-bot commented Jan 9, 2022

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

merge advice

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 601/1000
Why? Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.3
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-NODEFORGE-2331908
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 663/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.4
Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-NODEFORGE-2331910
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: node-forge The new version differs by 33 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

@snyk-bot snyk-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 9, 2022 18:00
@gkwang gkwang closed this Jan 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants