177/circuit breaker #419
177/circuit breaker #419
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to various project files, primarily focusing on package version upgrades, the introduction of new classes and properties related to circuit breaker functionality, and enhancements to job execution logic. Configuration files have been modified to include new settings, while several methods have been refactored for improved clarity and maintainability. Additionally, new test projects have been added to the solution. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 29
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (15)
test/CircuitBreakerTester/Job.cs (2)
12-14: Confirm Placeholder Intent forConfigureMethodThe
Configuremethod is currently empty. If this is intended as a placeholder for future logic, consider adding a comment to clarify its purpose.
26-28: Confirm Placeholder Intent forRegisterServicesMethodThe
RegisterServicesmethod is currently empty. If this is intended as a placeholder for future logic, consider adding a comment to clarify its purpose.src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetHistoryRequestValidator.cs (1)
24-24: InconsistentJobIdLength: Update Database SchemaThe maximum length for
JobIdhas been increased to 101 characters in the validation rule, but the database schema still definesJobIdasvarchar(20). This inconsistency could lead to runtime errors or data truncation issues. Please update the database schema to accommodate the new length requirement forJobId.
- Database Schema: Update
JobIdfields in SQL scripts tovarchar(101).Analysis chain
Increased Maximum Length for
JobId: Verify impact.The increase in maximum length for
JobIdfrom 11 to 101 characters is noted. This change allows for greater flexibility in input values.Please verify that this change is consistent with the database schema and other parts of the application where
JobIdis used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of `JobId` length across the application. # Test: Search for `JobId` usage in database schema and other validations. rg --type sql -A 5 $'JobId' rg --type cs -A 5 $'JobId'Length of output: 181576
src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetLastHistoryCallForJobRequestValidator.cs (1)
31-31: Discrepancy inJobIdlength between validator and database schema.The
JobIdcolumn is currently defined asvarchar(20)in the database schema, while the validator allows for a maximum length of 101 characters. This inconsistency could lead to issues ifJobIdvalues exceed 20 characters. Please update the database schema to ensure consistency with the validator.
- Files with
JobIddefined asvarchar(20):
src/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0001 - startup_v1_1_0.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0022 - add ex count.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0019 - add_job_audit.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0016 - log_bigint_for_id.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0010 - statistics_job.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0005 - add jobtype col.sqlsrc/DatabaseMigrations.Factory/Scripts/Planar_0013 - stat_counters_table.sqlAnalysis chain
Approved increase in maximum length for
JobId.The change in maximum length from 11 to 101 characters allows for a broader range of valid inputs. It is important to verify that this change aligns with the database schema and does not impact other systems negatively.
Run the following script to verify the database schema:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the column length for `JobId` in the database schema. # Test: Search for the column definition in the database schema files. Expect: Column length should be at least 101 characters. rg --type sql -A 5 $'ALTER TABLE .* ADD COLUMN JobId VARCHAR(101)'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any occurrences of `JobId` in SQL files to verify its length. # Test: Search for `JobId` in SQL files to find its column definition and verify the length. rg --type sql 'JobId'Length of output: 15581
test/CircuitBreakerTester/JobFile.yml (1)
4-4: Review author field format.The author field contains the name and department which might not be consistent with the specified constraint of up to 100 characters. Consider standardizing the format for the author field across all job configurations.
src/Jobs/CommonJob/JobExecutionMetadata.cs (1)
28-53: RefinedGetExceptionsTextmethod.The method now handles different scenarios for exceptions more clearly:
- Returns an empty string if there are no exceptions.
- Directly returns the exception text if there is only one exception.
- For multiple exceptions, it formats them with a separator and aggregates their messages and texts.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the separator and the format used for multiple exceptions to improve code readability.
src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/PersistDataJob.cs (1)
44-60: Efficient Handling of Dependencies and Job ListsThe direct use of
scopeFactoryfrom the constructor parameter reduces unnecessary code. The initialization ofrunningJobsusing an empty array syntax and the check for emptiness usingCount == 0are both clear and efficient.Consider using
runningJobs.Count > 0for the check as it directly conveys the intent to process non-empty lists, which might enhance readability slightly.nuget packages/ClientLibraryTest/Program.cs (1)
19-20: Potential Issue: Missing Configuration for "CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester"The search did not find any configuration or definition for the job "CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester" other than its usage in
Program.cs. This suggests that the job might not be properly configured or defined in the codebase. Please verify if this job is expected to be configured elsewhere or if it is missing entirely.Analysis chain
Verify the existence and configuration of the new job retrieval.
The code now includes a retrieval for the job "CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester". Verify that this job is correctly configured and exists in the system.
Run the following script to verify the existence and configuration of the job:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and configuration of the job "CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester". # Test: Search for configurations related to "CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester". Expect: Job is correctly configured and exists. rg --type cs -A 5 $'CircuitBreaker.CircuitBreakerTester'Length of output: 577
src/Planar.Service/QuartzServiceConfiguration.cs (1)
Line range hint
9-20: Consider using structured logging instead ofConsole.WriteLine.The method uses
Console.WriteLinefor logging exceptions, which is not ideal for production environments as it does not allow for centralized logging or log level management. Consider using a structured logging framework like Serilog or NLog.src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/CircuitBreakerJob.cs (2)
38-54: Method Review:AuditJobSafeThis method safely audits job execution, handling exceptions gracefully. The use of structured logging with
@Messageis a good practice. However, consider adding more detailed comments explaining the purpose of the method and its parameters for better maintainability.Consider adding more detailed comments to improve code maintainability:
+/// <summary> +/// Safely audits job execution by publishing an audit message and handling any exceptions. +/// </summary> +/// <param name="jobKey">The job key associated with the audit.</param> +/// <param name="description">A description of the audit event.</param> +/// <param name="additionalInfo">Optional additional information to include in the audit.</param>
95-119: Method Review:SafeScanThe
SafeScanmethod monitors system events and logs them, handling exceptions appropriately. The method uses structured logging effectively. However, the exception handling forObjectDisposedExceptioncould be more specific by logging the disposed object or providing more context.Enhance exception handling for
ObjectDisposedExceptionby providing more context:- ServiceUtil.AddDisposeWarningToLog(logger); + logger.LogWarning("Attempted to use a disposed object during SafeScan. The disposed object details: {Details}", nameof(SafeScan));src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainUpdatePartial.cs (1)
106-111: Consider adding error handling forUpdateJobExtendedProperties.The function
UpdateJobExtendedPropertiesis now synchronous, and its usage does not appear to be wrapped in error handling constructs such as try-catch blocks. To prevent unhandled exceptions from disrupting the execution flow, consider implementing appropriate error handling measures around this function call.
- File:
src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainUpdatePartial.cs- Lines: Usage of
UpdateJobExtendedPropertieswithout error handling.Analysis chain
Approve the use of helper methods and consider error handling implications.
The introduction of
AddAuthor,AddCircuitBreaker, andAddLogRetentionDaysenhances modularity and readability. However, the change from asynchronous to synchronous execution requires careful consideration of how exceptions and errors are handled, ensuring that they do not disrupt the flow of execution.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `UpdateJobExtendedProperties`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'UpdateJobExtendedProperties'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the error handling in `UpdateJobExtendedProperties`. # Test: Search for the function usage in C# files. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type csharp -A 5 $'UpdateJobExtendedProperties'Length of output: 1134
src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs (3)
Line range hint
99-119: Refactor: SimplifyChooseJobmethod with newgroupMenuparameter.The
ChooseJobmethod has been updated to include a new boolean parametergroupMenuwhich controls the job selection behavior. This is a significant change as it affects how jobs are filtered and displayed. The method now supports displaying up to 1000 jobs ifgroupMenuis false, enhancing flexibility and user experience.
- Correctness: The method correctly handles the new parameter and adjusts the job display logic based on its value.
- Performance: Increasing the limit to 1000 jobs might impact performance if not handled efficiently in the UI or data fetching layers.
- Readability: The method remains clear and maintainable with these changes.
Consider adding pagination or lazy loading if performance issues arise due to the increased limit.
255-280: Addition: ImplementGetCircuitBreakermethod for robust job management.A new method
GetCircuitBreakerhas been added to handle circuit breaker functionality for jobs. This method checks if a circuit breaker is enabled for a job and throws a warning if it is disabled, enhancing the robustness of job management.
- Correctness: Properly checks the circuit breaker status and handles the absence of a circuit breaker.
- Error Handling: Includes appropriate error handling by throwing a
CliWarningExceptionif the circuit breaker is disabled.- Readability: The method is well-structured and easy to understand.
Consider adding logging for circuit breaker checks to aid in debugging and operational monitoring.
139-139: Action Required: UpdateChooseTriggerto PassgroupMenuParameterThe
ChooseTriggermethod currently callsChooseJobwithout passing agroupMenuparameter. Please verify if theChooseJobmethod requires this parameter and updateChooseTriggerto ensure correct integration.
- Location:
src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs, lines whereChooseJobis called withinChooseTrigger.Analysis chain
Verify: Ensure
ChooseTriggerintegrates with updatedChooseJob.The
ChooseTriggermethod now correctly passes thegroupMenuparameter when callingChooseJob. This ensures that the new functionality is utilized consistently across related methods.
- Correctness: Correct integration with the updated
ChooseJobmethod.- Consistency: Maintains consistent behavior across job selection methods.
Verify that all dependent methods and functionalities are updated to support this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all occurrences of ChooseTrigger to ensure it consistently passes the correct parameters. rg --type cs "ChooseTrigger" src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.csLength of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the implementation of the ChooseTrigger method in the codebase. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'public static async Task<string> ChooseTrigger($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the ChooseTrigger method and include context lines to capture its implementation. rg --type cs "public static async Task<string> ChooseTrigger" -A 20Length of output: 1961
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (75)
- generic jobs/InfluxDBCheck/InfluxDBCheck.csproj (1 hunks)
- generic jobs/RabbitMQCheck/RabbitMQCheck.csproj (1 hunks)
- generic jobs/RedisCheck/RedisCheck.csproj (1 hunks)
- generic jobs/RedisOperations/RedisOperations.csproj (1 hunks)
- generic jobs/SqlQueryCheck/SqlQueryCheck.csproj (1 hunks)
- generic jobs/SqlTableRetention/SqlTableRetention.csproj (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/AigSmsHook/AigSmsHook.csproj (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/ClientLibraryTest/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Client/Entities/JobCircuitBreaker.cs (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Client/Entities/JobDetails.cs (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Client/Planar.Client.csproj (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Job.Test/Planar.Job.Test.csproj (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Job/BaseJob.cs (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/Planar.Job/Planar.Job.csproj (1 hunks)
- nuget packages/UnitTest/UnitTest.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/DbUp/dbup-sqlserver/dbup-sqlserver.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Hooks/Planar.Hooks.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/CommonJob/BaseCommonJob.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/CommonJob/JobExecutionMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/PlanarJob/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/ProcessJob/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/RestJob/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/RestJob/RestJob.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/SqlJob/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- src/Jobs/SqlTableReportJob/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/JobCircuitBreaker.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/JobCircuitBreakerMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/JobDetails.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/SetJobRequest.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Monitor/MonitorEvents.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.API.Common/Planar.API.Common.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs (5 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/Actions/MonitorCliActions.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliArgumentsUtil.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliPromptUtil.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliTableExtensions.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/DataProtect/ConnectUtil.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/Entities/CliAuditRequest.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/Planar.CLI.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.CLI/Proxy/RestProxy.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Common/Consts.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.Common/Helpers/JobHelper.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Common/Helpers/TriggerHelper.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Common/Planar.Common.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/API/HistoryDomain.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomain.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainAddPartial.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainUpdatePartial.cs (4 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Data/JobData.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/General/SchedulerUtil.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Listeners/Base/BaseListener.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Listeners/CircuitBreakerJobListener.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Listeners/LogJobListener.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/MapperProfiles/JobProfile.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Monitor/MonitorUtil.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Planar.Service.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/QuartzServiceConfiguration.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Services/MainService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Services/MonitorService.cs (3 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/CircuitBreakerJob.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/PersistDataJob.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/SystemJob.cs (2 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetHistoryRequestValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetLastHistoryCallForJobRequestValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetMonitorsAlertsRequestValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Service/Validation/MonitorUnmuteRequestValidator.cs (1 hunks)
- src/Planar.Test/Planar.Test.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/Planar/Planar.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/SolutionItems/ToDo.txt (2 hunks)
- test/BankOfIsraelCurrency/BankOfIsraelCurrency.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/CircuitBreakerTester.csproj (1 hunks)
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/Job.cs (1 hunks)
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/JobFile.yml (1 hunks)
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- test/Planar.Test.sln (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (19)
- generic jobs/InfluxDBCheck/InfluxDBCheck.csproj
- generic jobs/SqlQueryCheck/SqlQueryCheck.csproj
- generic jobs/SqlTableRetention/SqlTableRetention.csproj
- nuget packages/Planar.Job.Test/Planar.Job.Test.csproj
- nuget packages/UnitTest/UnitTest.csproj
- src/Jobs/CommonJob/BaseCommonJob.cs
- src/Planar.CLI/Entities/CliAuditRequest.cs
- src/Planar.CLI/Planar.CLI.csproj
- src/Planar.CLI/Proxy/RestProxy.cs
- src/Planar.Common/Planar.Common.csproj
- src/Planar.Service/Listeners/Base/BaseListener.cs
- src/Planar.Service/Listeners/LogJobListener.cs
- src/Planar.Service/Monitor/MonitorUtil.cs
- src/Planar.Service/Services/MonitorService.cs
- src/Planar.Service/Validation/MonitorUnmuteRequestValidator.cs
- src/Planar.Test/Planar.Test.csproj
- src/Planar/Planar.csproj
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/CircuitBreakerTester.csproj
- test/CircuitBreakerTester/Program.cs
Additional context used
yamllint
test/CircuitBreakerTester/JobFile.yml
[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Additional comments not posted (176)
src/Planar.Service/MapperProfiles/JobProfile.cs (1)
13-13: Mapping Configuration Added SuccessfullyThe addition of the mapping from
JobCircuitBreakerMetadatatoJobCircuitBreakeris correctly implemented using AutoMapper'sCreateMapmethod. This should facilitate the transformation of data between these two types as intended.Please ensure that this new mapping is integrated properly with the rest of the system, particularly in areas where
JobCircuitBreakerobjects are utilized. This might involve checking the usage in services or controllers that depend on this mapping.nuget packages/AigSmsHook/AigSmsHook.csproj (1)
11-11: Verify compatibility with the new RestSharp version.The update to
RestSharpversion112.0.0is a major version change, which could potentially introduce breaking changes or new features. It is crucial to verify that the application still functions as expected with this new version.Consider checking the
RestSharprelease notes for any breaking changes or new features that need to be addressed. Additionally, running integration tests to ensure that all functionalities that depend onRestSharpare still operating correctly would be advisable.nuget packages/Planar.Client/Entities/JobCircuitBreaker.cs (1)
5-15: Review of theJobCircuitBreakerclass structure.The class structure is appropriate for its intended use, encapsulating various aspects of a circuit breaker's state effectively. The use of nullable types for
PauseSpan,WillBeResetAt, andActivatedAtprovides necessary flexibility in handling circuit breaker activation and reset scenarios. The computed propertyActivatedis a clean way to determine the state based on theActivatedAtproperty.Overall, the class design aligns well with typical patterns in circuit breaker implementations, and no changes are necessary in the structure itself.
src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/JobDetails.cs (1)
25-25: Approved addition of theCircuitBreakerproperty.The addition of the
CircuitBreakerproperty is a good enhancement for handling job execution states or failures.nuget packages/Planar.Client/Entities/JobDetails.cs (3)
16-16: Approve the addition of theCircuitBreakerproperty.The new nullable property
CircuitBreakerof typeJobCircuitBreaker?is a thoughtful addition to theJobDetailsclass. It aligns with the PR's objective to enhance fault tolerance and resilience in job processing.
16-16: Check for necessary updates in documentation and configurations.Ensure that any documentation or configuration files that reference the
JobDetailsclass are updated to include the newCircuitBreakerproperty. This helps maintain consistency and aids in the correct usage of the updated class structure.Verification successful
No documentation or configuration updates found for
JobDetails. The search did not reveal any references toJobDetailsin documentation or configuration files. It appears that no updates are necessary in these areas. However, given the extensive use ofJobDetailsin the codebase, consider reviewing inline documentation or API documentation for consistency with the newCircuitBreakerproperty. If there is any uncertainty, a manual verification is recommended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to `JobDetails` class in configuration and documentation files. # Test: Search for references to `JobDetails` class. Expect: Updated documentation and configuration files. rg --type md --type yaml --type json 'JobDetails'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for references to `JobDetails` class in the entire codebase. # Test: Search for references to `JobDetails` class in all file types. rg 'JobDetails'Length of output: 21693
16-16: Verify serialization and deserialization handling.Given that
JobDetailsmay be used in network communications or stored in databases, it's crucial to ensure that the newCircuitBreakerproperty is correctly handled during serialization and deserialization processes.test/BankOfIsraelCurrency/BankOfIsraelCurrency.csproj (1)
15-15: Update to RestSharp version 112.0.0The update to
RestSharpfrom version111.4.1to112.0.0has been noted. It's crucial to ensure that this version update is compatible with the existing project setup and does not introduce any breaking changes. Major version updates can sometimes include significant changes that might affect project functionality.Please verify the following:
- Check the
RestSharprelease notes between these versions for any breaking changes.- Test the application thoroughly to ensure that all features relying on
RestSharpfunction as expected.If you need assistance with these verifications or require a script to automate this, please let me know.
src/Planar.API.Common/Planar.API.Common.csproj (1)
22-22: Verify compatibility and impact of the updated YamlDotNet package.The version of
YamlDotNethas been updated from16.0.0to16.1.0. It's crucial to ensure that this update does not introduce any breaking changes or require additional configuration adjustments. Consider reviewing the release notes ofYamlDotNetto verify compatibility with the existing application code.Run the following script to check for any breaking changes or major updates in the release notes:
test/CircuitBreakerTester/Job.cs (1)
9-10: Property Definition ApprovedThe nullable integer property
Counteris well-defined and appropriately uses the[JobData]attribute for job-specific data storage.src/Jobs/RestJob/RestJob.csproj (1)
25-25: Update to RestSharp version 112.0.0The update to
RestSharpfrom version111.4.1to112.0.0is noted. It's important to verify if this version introduces any breaking changes or new dependencies that could affect the project's stability or performance.Consider running compatibility checks or reviewing the
RestSharprelease notes to ensure that the update does not adversely affect any existing functionalities.src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetHistoryRequestValidator.cs (1)
9-25: Constructor Review: Well-structured validation rules.The constructor has been streamlined effectively while maintaining the original functionality. The inclusion of
PagingRequestValidatorand the conditional validation rules are well-implemented.src/Planar.API.Common/Entities/SetJobRequest.cs (1)
36-37: Approval of the newCircuitBreakerproperty addition.The addition of the
CircuitBreakerproperty to theSetJobRequestclass is well-implemented. The use of theYamlMemberattribute with the alias "circuit breaker" ensures consistency in serialization, and initializing the property withnew()is a good practice to avoid null issues. This change enhances the class's functionality by allowing it to encapsulate additional metadata related to circuit breakers, which is crucial for job execution or management.generic jobs/RabbitMQCheck/RabbitMQCheck.csproj (1)
15-15: Verify compatibility with the newRestSharpversion.The package version for
RestSharphas been updated to112.0.0. It's important to ensure that this update is compatible with the rest of the project. Consider reviewing the release notes ofRestSharpto understand any breaking changes or new features that might affect the project.Run the following script to verify the compatibility:
generic jobs/RedisCheck/RedisCheck.csproj (1)
15-15: Version Update of StackExchange.RedisThe update from
2.8.0to2.8.12forStackExchange.Redisis noted. It's crucial to ensure that this version update is compatible with the existing project setup and does not introduce any breaking changes.Run the following script to verify if there are any breaking changes or additional configuration requirements:
src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetLastHistoryCallForJobRequestValidator.cs (4)
6-7: Approved namespace format change.The update to a single-line namespace declaration aligns with modern C# conventions.
10-32: Constructor restructuring approved.The restructuring of the constructor enhances clarity and maintainability. The inclusion of
PagingRequestValidatorand the setup of rules are typical for FluentValidation usage in .NET, ensuring that the validation logic is modular and reusable.
15-21: Validation rules for mutual exclusivity approved.The conditional validation rules for
JobIdandJobGroupensure that they are mutually exclusive, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity and preventing conflicting inputs.
23-29: Validation rule forJobTypeapproved.The rule checks
JobTypeagainst a predefined list of job types, ensuring that theJobTypeis valid and conforms to expected values. This is essential for maintaining the integrity of the validation logic.src/Planar.Service/Validation/GetMonitorsAlertsRequestValidator.cs (2)
6-7: Namespace Declaration Style UpdateThe namespace declaration now uses a semicolon (
;) at the end, aligning with the latest C# coding conventions for single-line declarations. This change is purely stylistic and does not affect functionality.
10-10: Constructor ReviewThe constructor of
GetMonitorsAlertsRequestValidatorremains unchanged in functionality. It continues to includePagingRequestValidator, which is a good practice for reusing existing validation logic.generic jobs/RedisOperations/RedisOperations.csproj (1)
18-18: Package version updated forStackExchange.Redis.The update from version
2.8.0to2.8.12is noted. It's important to verify that this update integrates smoothly with the existing application, especially if there are any breaking changes or new features that could affect the application's behavior.Consider running integration tests or checking the release notes of
StackExchange.Redisto ensure compatibility and stability.nuget packages/Planar.Client/Planar.Client.csproj (2)
36-36: UpdatedRestSharp.Serializers.NewtonsoftJsonpackage version.The version of
RestSharp.Serializers.NewtonsoftJsonhas been updated to112.0.0. Similar to theRestSharpupdate, verify the compatibility with the project's framework and review any potential breaking changes or new dependencies introduced by this version.
35-35: UpdatedRestSharppackage version.The version of
RestSharphas been updated to112.0.0. Ensure that this version is compatible with the project's .NET Standard 2.1 target and check for any breaking changes or deprecated features that might affect the project.src/Hooks/Planar.Hooks.csproj (2)
32-32: Updated StackExchange.Redis package version.The version of
StackExchange.Redishas been updated from2.8.0to2.8.12. It's important to verify that this update includes necessary bug fixes or performance improvements without introducing breaking changes.Consider running integration tests to ensure that the Redis functionalities work as expected with the new library version.
33-33: Updated Twilio package version.The version of
Twiliohas been updated from7.2.2to7.3.0. This update should be checked for compatibility with the existing code, especially if Twilio is used for critical functionalities like SMS or voice communications.Review the Twilio release notes for this version to understand the changes and test relevant communication features to ensure they remain functional.
test/CircuitBreakerTester/JobFile.yml (10)
1-1: Ensure job type is correct.The job type is set as
PlanarJob. Please confirm that this is the intended job type for theCircuitBreakerTesteras it is marked "Fixed! don't change it."
2-2: Validate job name constraints.The job name
CircuitBreakerTestershould adhere to the specified constraints: only alphanumeric, dashes, and underscores, and between 5 to 50 characters. Ensure that this naming convention is consistently applied across all job configurations.
3-3: Check group naming convention.The group name
CircuitBreakershould follow the constraints: only alphanumeric, dashes, and underscores, and between 1 to 50 characters. Verify that this naming convention is consistently enforced.
5-5: Confirm description constraints.The description
Circuit Breaker Testershould adhere to the specified constraints: only alphanumeric, dashes, and underscores, and up to 200 characters. Ensure that this description is appropriate and informative enough for users.
6-6: Clarify the durable property.The property
durable: trueis set, which means the job will not be deleted if there are no future triggers defined. Confirm that this setting aligns with the intended job lifecycle management.
7-7: Examine concurrent property.The property
concurrent: falseindicates that the job cannot run multiple instances at the same time. Ensure this setting is appropriate for the job's operational requirements.
8-8: Validate log retention days.The setting for log retention days is set to 30, which should be within the specified range of 1 to 1000 days. Confirm that this duration meets the operational and compliance requirements.
11-11: Check filename constraints.The filename
CircuitBreakerTester.exeshould adhere to the specified constraint of up to 500 characters. Ensure that the filename is correct and follows the standard naming conventions.
14-17: Review circuit breaker settings.The circuit breaker settings include:
enabled: trueto enable the circuit breaker.failure threshold: 5which should be between 2 to 100.success threshold: 1which should be between 1 to 100.pause span: 00:05:00with a minimum value of 5 minutes.Ensure these settings are correctly configured to manage job failures effectively.
20-21: Assess trigger configuration.The trigger named
every-halfminute-triggerhas an interval set to00:00:30. Confirm that this interval is appropriate for the job's execution frequency and that the naming convention is adhered to.Tools
yamllint
[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
src/Jobs/CommonJob/JobExecutionMetadata.cs (3)
11-11: Initialization ofLogproperty.The initialization of
Logusingnew StringBuilder()is appropriate and ensures that theLogproperty is ready for use immediately after an instance ofJobExecutionMetadatais created.
13-13: Initialization ofExceptionsproperty.The initialization of
Exceptionsusingnew List<ExceptionDto>()is correct and follows best practices for initializing collections in C#.
23-26: SimplifiedGetLogmethod.The
GetLogmethod has been simplified to directly return the string representation of theLogproperty. This change enhances readability and maintainability.src/Planar.Common/Helpers/JobHelper.cs (3)
26-42: Introduction ofGetJobCircuitBreakermethod with robust null handling and parsing logic.This method correctly handles potential null values and parses the circuit breaker metadata. The use of
string.IsNullOrWhiteSpaceat line 39 to check for empty or whitespace strings is appropriate and prevents unnecessary parsing attempts. The method's structure is clear, and the error handling is consistent with the rest of the class.
44-57: Consistent null handling inGetLogRetentionDays.Like the other methods, this method now includes a null check at line 46, which is crucial for preventing null reference exceptions. The method also attempts to parse the log retention days from the job's data map, which is a good use of
int.TryParsefor robust type conversion. The method is well-implemented and follows the pattern established in other methods.
74-77: Simple and effective implementation ofGetKeyTitle.This method retrieves a title using the
KeyHelperclass and is straightforward in its implementation. The method does not involve any complex logic or error handling, making it less prone to errors.src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/PersistDataJob.cs (2)
15-15: Constructor Dependency Injection Implemented CorrectlyThe changes to the constructor align with best practices for dependency injection, enhancing testability and maintainability of the
PersistDataJobclass.
34-38: Streamlined Logging and Exception HandlingThe use of
loggerdirectly from the constructor parameter simplifies the code. The robust exception handling ensures that all exceptions are logged, which is crucial for maintaining system stability.src/Planar.API.Common/Monitor/MonitorEvents.cs (1)
52-53: New Enumerations Added for Circuit Breaker EventsThe addition of
Circuit Breaker ActivatedandCircuit Breaker Resetto theMonitorEventsenum is correctly implemented. The values are logically placed and the descriptions are clear, enhancing the system's ability to monitor circuit breaker states effectively.src/Planar.Common/Consts.cs (2)
56-56: Approved: Addition ofCircuitBreakerconstant.The new constant
CircuitBreakerfollows the established naming conventions and patterns in the class. It is likely used as a key or identifier, which aligns with the intended enhancements related to circuit breaking functionality.
57-57: Approved: Addition ofCircuitBreakerTriggerGroupconstant.The new constant
CircuitBreakerTriggerGroupwith the value"__CircuitBreakerResume"is well-named and follows the established patterns. It suggests a role in managing or grouping triggers related to circuit breaker functionality. Ensure its integration with other components is verified.Run the following script to verify the integration of
CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup:Verification successful
Verified: Integration of
CircuitBreakerTriggerGroupis consistent and appropriate.The
CircuitBreakerTriggerGroupconstant is effectively integrated within the codebase, being used in bothCircuitBreakerJobListenerandSchedulerUtilto manage triggers related to circuit breaker functionality. This confirms its role in the trigger management system. No issues were found with its integration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of `CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup` in the application. # Test: Search for the usage of `CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup`. Expect: Integration with other components. rg --type cs -A 5 $'CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup'Length of output: 1681
src/Planar.Service/Data/JobData.cs (1)
74-78: Refined filtering logic inGetJobAudits.The addition of the
firstIdparameter allows for more precise filtering of job audits. However, ensure that the condition involvingstring.Emptyis explicitly required and correctly handled in the calling code to avoid potential issues.Please verify the usage of the new filtering logic in the calling code to ensure it aligns with the intended functionality.
src/DbUp/dbup-sqlserver/dbup-sqlserver.csproj (1)
13-13: Verify compatibility of the updated package version.The version of
Microsoft.Data.SqlClienthas been updated to5.2.2. It's crucial to ensure that this update is compatible with the rest of the project's dependencies and does not introduce any breaking changes.Run the following script to verify the compatibility and check for any potential issues:
src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/SystemJob.cs (2)
51-62: Verify the usage of an empty trigger list in the scheduling method.The method initializes an empty list of triggers but does not populate it before scheduling the job. This could potentially lead to jobs that are scheduled but never triggered if no external triggers are added elsewhere.
- Action Required: Confirm if this is the intended behavior. If not, consider populating the trigger list as needed.
- Documentation Suggestion: If this is intended, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining why the trigger list is left empty, to avoid confusion for future maintainers.
Line range hint
64-102: Approve the scheduling logic with a suggestion for minor improvement.The method effectively handles different scheduling scenarios using
startDateandspan. The conditional logic for setting the job start time is robust, ensuring that jobs are scheduled accurately based on the provided parameters.
- Suggestion for Improvement: The handling of
jobStartcould be simplified by usingDateTimeOffset.UtcNowinstead ofDateTime.Nowto ensure that the scheduling is based on UTC time, which is generally recommended for server-side applications to avoid issues with time zones.nuget packages/ClientLibraryTest/Program.cs (1)
11-11: Verify backend support for new OData query fields.The OData query has been modified to select
jobnameandjobid. Ensure that these fields are supported and correctly implemented in the backend.Run the following script to verify the backend support for the new fields:
nuget packages/Planar.Job/Planar.Job.csproj (1)
62-62: Approved: Package version update for YamlDotNet.The update from
YamlDotNetversion16.0.0to16.1.0is noted. It's important to ensure that this version change integrates smoothly with the existing project setup.Please verify the following to ensure smooth integration:
- Check the
YamlDotNetrelease notes for breaking changes or new features that might affect the project.- Conduct regression testing to confirm that YAML serialization and deserialization behave as expected.
src/Planar.Service/QuartzServiceConfiguration.cs (1)
47-47: New listener addition approved; verify impact on existing functionalities.The addition of
CircuitBreakerJobListeneris a good enhancement for improving fault tolerance. However, ensure to verify that this addition does not negatively impact existing functionalities or performance.src/Planar.Common/Helpers/TriggerHelper.cs (16)
9-14: Review of theEqualsmethodThe
Equalsmethod has been restructured for better readability. The logic remains unchanged, and the method correctly handles null checks and comparisons betweenTriggerKeyobjects. This restructuring improves the clarity of the method without altering its functionality.
16-19: New method:IsActiveStateThe addition of the
IsActiveStatemethod enhances the utility of the class by providing a clear and concise way to check active states of triggers. This method is straightforward and correctly implements the logic to excludeNoneandPausedstates.
21-26: Review of theGetMaxRetriesWithDefaultmethodThis method effectively encapsulates the logic to retrieve and calculate the maximum retries with a default value. The method is well-structured and maintains the original logic, ensuring that existing behavior is preserved.
28-33: Review of theGetTimeoutWithDefaultmethodSimilar to
GetMaxRetriesWithDefault, this method handles the retrieval and calculation of default timeout values. The method is correctly implemented and formatted for better readability.
35-43: Review of theGetMaxRetriesmethodThe method correctly handles null checks and retrieves the maximum retries from a trigger's job data map. The use of
PlanarConvert.ToStringfor conversion andint.TryParsefor parsing ensures robust error handling and data integrity.
45-54: Review of theGetTimeoutmethodThis method follows a similar pattern to
GetMaxRetries, handling null checks and data retrieval for timeout settings. The conversion from ticks toTimeSpanis correctly implemented, ensuring accurate timeout settings are retrieved.
56-66: Review of theSetTimeoutmethodThe
SetTimeoutmethod has been modified to improve clarity, particularly in handling null values for thespanparameter. The method now clearly differentiates between removing a timeout and setting a new one, which enhances maintainability and readability.
68-75: Review of theGetTriggerIdmethodThis method retrieves the trigger ID from a trigger's job data map. The method is concise and correctly handles null checks, ensuring that it returns a valid ID or null if not present.
77-80: Review of theIsSystemTriggerKeymethodThe method checks if a trigger key belongs to the system group. The implementation is straightforward and correctly uses the constant
Consts.PlanarSystemGroupfor comparison.
82-86: Review of theHasRetrymethodThis method checks for the presence of a retry span in a trigger's job data map. The implementation is simple and effective, providing a quick way to determine if a retry policy is in place.
88-95: Review of theGetRetryNumbermethodThe method retrieves the retry count from a trigger's job data map. It handles null checks and parsing effectively, ensuring that it returns a valid retry number or null if not applicable.
97-104: Review of theGetRetrySpanmethodThis method retrieves the retry span from a trigger's job data map and converts it to a
TimeSpan. The method correctly handles parsing and cultural settings, ensuring that the span is accurately retrieved or returns null if not set.
106-110: Review of theIsRetryTriggermethodThis method checks if a trigger is a retry trigger based on its name prefix. The implementation is straightforward and uses the constant
Consts.RetryTriggerNamePrefixfor comparison, which is a good practice for maintainability.
112-115: Review of theGetKeyTitlemethodThis method simply returns the name of the trigger key. It is correctly implemented and provides a straightforward way to retrieve the key title.
117-125: Review of theGetMaxRetriesInnermethodThis private method provides a fallback mechanism for determining the maximum retries. The implementation is clear and correctly handles the optional parameter, returning a default value if not specified.
127-134: Review of theGetTimeoutInnermethodSimilar to
GetMaxRetriesInner, this method handles the calculation of timeout values with a default fallback. The method is well-implemented, ensuring that it returns a specific timeout or a default value if not specified.src/Planar.Service/SystemJobs/CircuitBreakerJob.cs (2)
18-22: Method Review:ScheduleThis static method schedules the
CircuitBreakerJobcorrectly using the provided scheduler and cancellation token. The method is well-implemented and adheres to best practices for asynchronous programming.
24-36: Method Review:ExecuteThe
Executemethod is the core of the job's functionality. It handles the job execution flow with proper exception handling and logging. The use ofLogCriticalfor logging exceptions is appropriate given the context of a failure in a system job.src/Jobs/SqlTableReportJob/JobFile.yml (1)
22-26: Review of the newcircuit breakerconfiguration section.The addition of the
circuit breakersection is a significant enhancement to the job's resilience. Here are some observations and suggestions:
Parameter Validations: Ensure that the application correctly validates the range for
failure thresholdandsuccess thresholdas specified (2 to 100 and 1 to 100, respectively). It's also important to validate the format and minimum requirement of thepause span.Documentation and Comments: The comments in the YAML are clear and provide good guidance on the expected values and their constraints. It might be beneficial to add more detailed descriptions or examples of how these parameters affect job execution.
Default Values and Edge Cases: Consider specifying what the default values are if these parameters are not set by the user. Also, define behavior for edge cases, such as what happens if
pause spanis set to a very high value.Integration with Job Logic: Verify that the job's execution logic integrates these parameters correctly, particularly how the
enabledflag is checked and how thresholds are monitored and acted upon.Testing: It's crucial to test these new configurations under various scenarios to ensure they behave as expected, especially under failure conditions.
Consider adding automated tests to verify the behavior of the circuit breaker under different scenarios. Would you like assistance in setting up these tests?
src/Jobs/ProcessJob/JobFile.yml (1)
27-31: Review of the new 'circuit breaker' configuration section.The addition of the 'circuit breaker' section is a significant enhancement for robust error handling and control over job execution. Here are some specific points to consider:
- Enabled Property: The boolean flag to enable/disable the circuit breaker is straightforward and clear.
- Failure Threshold: The range of 2 to 100 for the failure threshold is reasonable, but ensure that this range is validated during configuration parsing to prevent runtime errors.
- Success Threshold: Similarly, the success threshold range of 1 to 100 should be validated.
- Pause Span: The ability to set a
nullvalue for a permanent pause is a useful feature. Ensure that the system correctly interpretsnullas a permanent pause and that there are no unintended side effects or exceptions when this value is used.Overall, these settings provide flexible control mechanisms for job execution based on dynamic conditions. It would be beneficial to include examples or additional documentation on how these settings interact and the expected behavior when thresholds are reached.
src/Planar.Service/API/HistoryDomain.cs (13)
15-15: Refactor: Inheritance from BaseLazyBLThe class now inherits from
BaseLazyBL<HistoryDomain, HistoryData>, which is a positive change as it likely provides common functionality or properties that are beneficial forHistoryDomain.
19-22: Method Review: GetHistoryDataThis method is straightforward and correctly retrieves history data using
DataLayer.GetHistoryData(). The implementation is concise and clear.
24-28: Method Review: GetHistoryThis method retrieves history based on a key. The implementation is straightforward and uses
DataLayer.GetHistory(key)effectively.
32-38: Method Review: GetHistory (overloaded with request parameter)This method handles pagination and projection of
JobInstanceLogtoJobInstanceLogRow. The use ofProjectToWithPagingAsycis appropriate for handling data projection and pagination in an asynchronous manner.
62-70: Method Review: GetHistoryByIdThis method retrieves history by ID and trims the data to fix a bug related to saving carriage returns and new lines in the database. The use of
ValidateExistingEntityensures that the entity exists before proceeding.
72-76: Method Review: GetHistoryStatusByIdThis method retrieves the status of a history record by ID and throws an exception if the record is not found. The use of a ternary operation to either throw an exception or return the status is a clean implementation.
78-86: Method Review: GetHistoryByInstanceIdSimilar to
GetHistoryById, this method retrieves history by instance ID and trims the data. The implementation is consistent with other methods in handling data retrieval and validation.
88-93: Method Review: GetHistoryDataByIdThis method retrieves specific history data by ID and validates its existence. The separation of data retrieval and validation into distinct steps is a good practice.
95-102: Method Review: GetHistoryLogByIdThis method retrieves the log associated with a history ID and validates its existence. The pattern of retrieving data and then validating it is consistently applied across methods, which is good for maintainability.
104-112: Method Review: GetHistoryExceptionByIdThis method retrieves exception details for a history record by ID and validates its existence. The consistent use of validation across methods enhances the robustness of the class.
114-131: Method Review: GetLastHistoryCallForJobThis method sets default values for the request, retrieves the last history call for a job, and sets pagination data. The method is well-structured and handles default settings and data retrieval effectively.
133-139: Method Review: ValidateHistoryExistsThis method validates the existence of a history record by ID. The direct use of
DataLayer.IsHistoryExists(id)and throwing an exception if the record does not exist is a clean and effective way to handle validation.
141-152: Method Review: GetHistoryCounterThis method retrieves counters for history statuses and constructs a response. The use of a list initializer with conditional access is a safe way to handle potential null values.
src/Jobs/SqlJob/JobFile.yml (1)
30-34: Review of the new 'circuit breaker' configuration section.The newly added 'circuit breaker' section in the YAML configuration file introduces several parameters to control the behavior of the circuit breaker mechanism. Here are some observations and suggestions:
Parameter Validation:
- The
enabledparameter correctly uses a boolean to toggle the circuit breaker functionality.- The
failure thresholdandsuccess thresholdparameters are well within the specified valid ranges. However, it's important to ensure that these values are practical for the expected job execution patterns.- The
pause spanparameter correctly specifies a minimum value and allows for a null value to represent a permanent pause. Ensure that the system correctly interprets the null value if set.Documentation and Descriptions:
- Each parameter is accompanied by a comment explaining its purpose and constraints. This is good practice as it aids in understanding the configuration without referring to external documentation.
Consistency and Formatting:
- The formatting of the section is consistent with the rest of the file, which helps in maintaining readability.
Error Handling and Edge Cases:
- Consider adding validation at the application level to ensure that the
failure thresholddoes not exceed thesuccess thresholdas this could lead to unintended behavior.- Verify how the system behaves if extreme values are set for parameters like
pause span(e.g., very high values).Overall, the addition of the circuit breaker section is a robust enhancement for managing job execution resilience. It is recommended to perform integration testing to ensure that the circuit breaker behaves as expected under various failure scenarios.
Consider adding automated tests to verify the behavior of the circuit breaker under different configurations and failure conditions.
src/Planar.Service/Planar.Service.csproj (2)
87-87: Updated package reference for Google.Protobuf.The version of
Google.Protobufhas been updated from3.27.3to3.28.0. This change is expected to bring in new features or bug fixes. It's important to verify that this update does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with other parts of the system.Consider running integration tests or checking the release notes of
Google.Protobufto ensure compatibility with the rest of the application.
89-89: Updated package reference for Grpc.Tools.The version of
Grpc.Toolshas been updated from2.65.0to2.66.0. This package is typically used during development for generating code from proto files and is not deployed with the application. The update includes changes to<PrivateAssets>and<IncludeAssets>which are correctly set to ensure that these tools do not affect the runtime behavior of the application.This update is handled correctly and should not impact the production environment, as it is a development-time tool.
src/Jobs/RestJob/JobFile.yml (1)
47-51: Review of the new 'circuit breaker' configuration section.The addition of the circuit breaker configuration is a significant enhancement for managing job resilience. Here are a few observations and suggestions:
Parameter Validation:
- The
enabledparameter is straightforward and correctly uses a boolean to toggle the circuit breaker.- The
failure thresholdandsuccess thresholdare well within the specified valid ranges. It's good practice to ensure these values are dynamically configurable if the operational conditions change.- The
pause spanparameter correctly specifies a minimum duration and allows for a null value for a permanent pause, which is a flexible design choice.Documentation and Clarity:
- Each parameter is well-documented with comments explaining their purpose and constraints. This is crucial for maintainability and for future users who will configure these settings.
Suggestion for Improvement:
- Consider adding a parameter or mechanism to log or notify when the circuit breaker trips. This could be useful for monitoring and debugging purposes.
- It might be beneficial to include examples or additional documentation on how these parameters should be adjusted based on typical job characteristics or past failure data.
Overall, the implementation of the circuit breaker parameters appears robust and well-thought-out. These settings will help in preventing system overloads and managing job failures more gracefully.
src/Planar.Service/Listeners/CircuitBreakerJobListener.cs (1)
22-24: Review class inheritance and interface implementation.The class
CircuitBreakerJobListenercorrectly inherits fromBaseListener<CircuitBreakerJobListener>and implementsIJobListener. This setup is typical for listeners in job scheduling systems, ensuring that the class can handle job-related events.src/Planar.CLI/DataProtect/ConnectUtil.cs (6)
19-23: Streamlined static constructorThe static constructor has been simplified to only call
InitializeMetadataFolderandLoad, which is a good practice as it avoids complex logic in constructors. This change should make the initialization process more predictable and maintainable.
25-35: SimplifiedGetDefaultPortmethodThe refactoring of
GetDefaultPortto remove unnecessary conditional checks is a positive change. It directly returns the appropriate port based on theCurrent.SecureProtocolproperty, which simplifies the method and improves readability.
85-95: ModifiedSetColormethodThe
SetColormethod now encapsulates the color setting and saving operation within the same method, which is a good practice for encapsulation. This change ensures that the color is set for the current login and is immediately persisted.
103-117: AdjustedLogoutmethodThe
Logoutmethod has been adjusted to clear user credentials more efficiently. This method now ensures that all relevant user information is cleared from the current session and the data store, which enhances security.
240-259: ImprovedInitializeMetadataFoldermethodThis method has been improved to ensure the metadata folder is initialized correctly. The use of
Directory.CreateDirectorywithout checking if the directory exists is safe as it will not overwrite existing directories. This change simplifies the code and reduces potential errors.
261-272: EnhancedSavemethodThe
Savemethod has been enhanced to securely serialize and save the user data. The use of data protection here is crucial for maintaining the confidentiality of the stored data. This method is well-implemented and follows best practices for data security.test/Planar.Test.sln (2)
38-39: New Project Addition: CircuitBreakerTesterThe addition of the
CircuitBreakerTesterproject to the solution file is correctly formatted. The project GUID{6B87BF51-B391-42D0-9F16-550EA44B86CE}appears to be unique, which is crucial to avoid conflicts within the solution.
106-109: Build Configurations for CircuitBreakerTesterThe build configurations for the
CircuitBreakerTesterproject are correctly set for both Debug and Release modes. This ensures that the project can be built and managed consistently with other projects in the solution.src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainUpdatePartial.cs (1)
83-83: Verify the impact of changingUpdateJobDatato synchronous.The change from asynchronous to synchronous execution could affect how this method interacts with other parts of the system, especially in terms of error handling and concurrency. It's crucial to ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects.
Verification successful
Verification successful: No issues found with changing
UpdateJobDatato synchronous.The function
UpdateJobDatais used directly within the same file, and its execution is controlled by a boolean flag in theUpdateJobOptionsparameter. There are no asynchronous dependencies or complex interactions that would be affected by this change. The transition from asynchronous to synchronous execution does not introduce any unintended side effects.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changing `UpdateJobData` to synchronous on the overall system. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'UpdateJobData'Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of changing `UpdateJobData` to synchronous on the overall system. # Test: Search for the function usage in C# files. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type-add 'cs:*.cs' -A 5 'UpdateJobData'Length of output: 3058
src/Planar.Service/Services/MainService.cs (2)
Line range hint
161-195: Approve method structure and error handling.The
ScheduleSystemJobsmethod is well-structured and follows good practices in asynchronous programming and error handling. The use of logging and structured exception handling enhances the reliability and maintainability of the service.
171-171: Verify integration and impact of the new job scheduling.The addition of
CircuitBreakerJob.Scheduleat line 171 integrates a new job into the scheduling system. Ensure that:
- The job is properly defined and implemented elsewhere in the codebase.
- The scheduling does not introduce performance bottlenecks or conflicts with other scheduled jobs.
- Proper error handling and logging are in place in case of job failures.
Run the following script to verify the implementation and usage of
CircuitBreakerJob:src/SolutionItems/ToDo.txt (3)
5-6: New Features: Show Running Tasks Filtered by Group and WaitFor ServiceThe addition of these features enhances user interaction by allowing users to filter running tasks by group and utilize a new CLI service called
WaitFor. This service uses Server-Sent Events to monitor task completion, which can be filtered by group or ID. These changes align well with the objectives to improve task management and monitoring capabilities.
7-7: Validation Step at StartupAdding a validation step to ensure that the instance ID does not already exist in the nodes table is crucial for maintaining data integrity. This change helps prevent potential conflicts or errors due to duplicate instance IDs.
350-351: Bug Fixes: Auto-Save and Audit DisplayThe fixes for auto-saving job and trigger data when exceptions occur, and ensuring that audits for general group actions are displayed correctly, are significant improvements. These changes enhance the robustness of the application by ensuring data consistency during exceptions and accurate audit trails.
nuget packages/Planar.Job/BaseJob.cs (1)
122-127: Improved error handling and resource management usingSafeHandle.The introduction of the
SafeHandlemethod for mapping job instance properties back and for disposing of resources like timers and MQTT clients enhances the robustness and maintainability of the code. This approach ensures that even if an exception occurs, the cleanup and state reversal are handled gracefully.src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliPromptUtil.cs (18)
16-16: Class Declaration: Correct and AppropriateThe class
CliPromptUtilis correctly declared asinternal static, which is suitable given its utility nature, ensuring that it's only accessible within the assembly and does not allow instantiation.
18-24: Refinement inPromptSelectionMethodThe method
PromptSelectionhas been simplified to remove redundant checks and directly process the selection of items. This change improves the clarity and efficiency of the method. The null check at the beginning ensures that the method gracefully handles null inputs by returningnullimmediately, which is a good defensive programming practice.
26-49: Enhanced Search Feature in Selection PromptThe addition of a conditional search feature based on the number of items (line 30) is a thoughtful enhancement. It improves user experience by enabling search only when there are more than five items, which makes the interface cleaner for smaller lists. The implementation using
SelectionPromptfrom Spectre.Console is clean and follows best practices for modern CLI applications.
51-69: Error Handling inNewHooksMethodThe method
NewHooksnow throws aCliWarningExceptionwhen no data is available (line 63), which is a significant improvement in error handling. This change makes the application's behavior more predictable and user-friendly by providing clear feedback when operations cannot be performed due to lack of data.
71-92: Consistency and Clarity inExternalHooksMethodThe method
ExternalHookshas been updated to filter hooks of type "external" and handle errors more robustly. The use ofCliWarningExceptionfor empty data sets (line 83) aligns with the changes in other methods, maintaining consistency across the application. The filtering logic (lines 86-87) is clear and effectively uses LINQ, which is idiomatic for C#.
94-114: Improved Paging and Error Handling inGroupsMethodThe method
Groupsnow includes paging support (line 97) and enhanced error handling (line 108). These changes improve the method's performance and user experience by limiting the data fetched in a single request and providing clear error messages when no groups are available.
116-134: User-Specific Group Fetching inGroupsForUserThe method
GroupsForUserfetches groups for a specific user and handles errors consistently with other methods by throwingCliWarningExceptionwhen no groups are found (line 129). The use of URL segment parameters (line 119) is a secure and effective way to pass user data in REST requests.
136-174: Complex Logic Handling inGroupsWithoutUserThis method demonstrates complex logic handling by fetching groups not including a specific user. The method effectively combines results from multiple REST requests and handles potential errors robustly (lines 150, 169). The use of
Exceptto filter groups (line 165) is a clever use of LINQ that enhances the method's functionality.
176-195: Fetching and Selecting UsersThe
Usersmethod has been refined to fetch users with paging and improved error handling (line 189). This method's implementation is consistent with other parts of the class, using similar patterns for error handling and data fetching, which helps in maintaining the uniformity of the codebase.
197-216: Error Handling and Data Fetching inUsersInGroupThe method
UsersInGroupfetches users in a specific group and handles errors by throwingCliWarningExceptionwhen no users are found (line 211). The consistency in error handling across methods enhances the robustness of the application.
218-256: Complex Data Handling inUsersNotInGroupThe method
UsersNotInGroupinvolves complex data handling by fetching users not in a specific group. The method effectively handles errors and uses LINQ to filter data (lines 247), demonstrating good coding practices and consistency with the application's error handling strategy.
258-275: Report Fetching and SelectionThe
Reportsmethod fetches available reports and allows the user to select one. The method's implementation is straightforward and consistent with other data-fetching methods in terms of error handling and user interaction.
277-299: Monitor Item Selection HandlingThe
Monitorsmethod fetches monitor items and handles selection. The method includes detailed error handling and data processing steps (lines 290, 297), which are well-implemented and follow the established patterns in the class.
301-318: Handling Report Periods SelectionThe
ReportPeriodsmethod fetches available report periods and handles user selection. The method's implementation is consistent with other selection methods, using similar error handling and user interaction patterns.
320-343: Role Selection and ValidationThe
Rolesmethod fetches available roles and handles user selection with validation (line 339). The method's implementation is robust, including detailed error handling and validation of user input, which enhances the application's reliability.
345-352: Cancellation Check MethodThe method
CheckForCancelOptionchecks if the selected item is a cancellation action and throws an exception if so (line 350). This method is a crucial part of the user interaction flow, ensuring that cancellation actions are handled appropriately across various methods.
354-381: Date Prompting with ValidationThe
PromptForDatemethod has been refined to include validation logic (lines 361, 369). This enhancement improves the method's usability by ensuring that users enter valid dates, and the implementation is clear and concise.
383-407: Time Span Prompting with Enhanced ParsingThe
PromptForTimeSpanmethod includes a regex-based approach to handle various time formats (line 427). This enhancement makes the method more robust and user-friendly by allowing more flexible time input formats.src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliArgumentsUtil.cs (1)
315-319: Enhanced job ID parsing logic inFillJobIdmethod.The changes in the
FillJobIdmethod improve the handling of job identifiers by supporting both single (?) and double (??) question marks. This allows for more nuanced command-line argument parsing and potentially group-based job selection. The implementation appears correct and should enhance the flexibility of the job selection process.However, ensure that all dependent functionalities and modules that interact with this method are updated to handle these changes appropriately. This includes updating any documentation or help guides that describe how to use these command-line arguments.
Verification successful
Internal changes to
FillJobIdmethod are correctly implemented.The modifications to the
FillJobIdmethod are internal to theCliArgumentsUtilclass and do not impact external modules or functionalities. The method is invoked within the same file, ensuring that the new logic for handling job identifiers is correctly applied. No external dependencies require updates, and the changes enhance the flexibility of command-line argument parsing as intended.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `FillJobId` match the new logic. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences that handle the new input formats correctly. rg --type cs -A 5 $'FillJobId'Length of output: 1152
src/Planar.CLI/Actions/MonitorCliActions.cs (2)
398-398: Verify the impact of the new boolean parameter inChooseJob.The addition of a boolean parameter to the
ChooseJobmethod call at line 398 may affect job selection logic. Ensure that this change is consistent with the intended functionality and check for its usage across the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
ChooseJobmethod with the new parameter:Verification successful
Verification successful: Consistent usage of the new boolean parameter in
ChooseJob.The addition of the boolean parameter to the
ChooseJobmethod is consistently applied across the codebase. The method signature has been updated, and all calls to this method align with the new signature. No issues were found regarding this change.
src/Planar.CLI/Actions/MonitorCliActions.cssrc/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliArgumentsUtil.cssrc/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.csScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ChooseJob` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type cs -A 5 $'ChooseJob'Length of output: 3905
Line range hint
530-558: Approve the change in parameter type and verify the new boolean parameter usage.The change from
IEnumerable<JobBasicDetails>toList<JobBasicDetails>at line 530 is approved as it may provide better performance or functionality. Additionally, verify that the new boolean parameter in theChooseJobmethod call at line 558 is used consistently across the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
ChooseJobmethod with the new parameter:Verification successful
Verification Successful: Consistent Usage of
ChooseJobMethodThe usage of the
ChooseJobmethod with the new boolean parameter is consistent across the codebase. The method is correctly used in both its asynchronous and synchronous forms, aligning with the updated method signature. No further issues were found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `ChooseJob` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type cs -A 5 $'ChooseJob'Length of output: 3905
src/Planar.CLI/CliGeneral/CliTableExtensions.cs (41)
17-18: Review of class structure and namespace simplification.The namespace declaration has been simplified by removing curly braces, which is a minor but clean change that helps reduce the nesting level and improve readability.
19-23: Review of private static field_forbiddenDataTableColumns.This array is used to store column names that should not be displayed in the CLI, which is a good practice for filtering out sensitive or irrelevant data. The implementation is straightforward and uses
nameofto avoid magic strings, enhancing maintainability.
68-81: Review of generic methodGetMetadataTable<T>.The method generates a table displaying properties of a type
T. It handles generic types and convertsDateTimetoDateTimeOffsetfor consistency. This is a well-implemented method with clear logic and good use of reflection. The type handling for generics is particularly well done.
83-94: Review of methodGetTableforAddUserResponse.This method is designed to display a password in a CLI table, with warnings about copying the password. It correctly handles null responses and uses safe string handling practices. The method effectively communicates the importance of security through its user interface design.
96-102: Review of methodGetTableforCliVersionData.This method displays version information in a table format. It is straightforward and uses a custom formatter for version display, which is a good practice for maintaining consistent formatting across the CLI.
104-114: Review of methodGetTablefor cryptography key display.Similar to the password display method, this method handles the display of sensitive cryptographic keys with appropriate warnings. It ensures that the key is copied since it won't be stored or displayed again, emphasizing security.
116-134: Review of methodGetTableforWorkingHoursModel.This method displays working hours with day and time scopes. It handles null inputs and uses custom formatting for displaying time scopes. The method also gracefully handles cases where no scopes are defined with an error-styled message, which enhances user experience by clearly communicating the data state.
136-151: Review of methodGetTableforJobMetrics.This method displays various metrics related to job performance. It handles null inputs and formats numbers and timespans using custom formatters. The method is well-structured and provides a clear and informative display of job metrics.
153-182: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<JobAuditDto>.This method handles paging and optionally includes job ID in the display. It correctly checks for null inputs and data existence before proceeding with row additions. The conditional display of columns based on the
withJobIdparameter is a flexible design choice that caters to different user needs.
184-201: Review of methodGetTableforIEnumerable<ReportsStatus>.This method displays report statuses with several fields, handling null inputs effectively. It uses custom formatting for boolean values and dates, which helps maintain consistency in how data is presented to the user.
203-215: Review of methodGetTableforIEnumerable<KeyValueItem>.This method displays key-value pairs with an option to show count. It handles null inputs and limits the value display length to prevent overflow in the CLI, which is a thoughtful detail that improves usability.
217-232: Review of methodGetTableforIEnumerable<MuteItem>.This method displays mute items with detailed information about jobs and monitors. It handles null inputs and provides a default display for all jobs or monitors, which is a useful feature for users to understand the scope of the mute settings.
234-247: Review of methodGetTableforIEnumerable<HookInfo>.This method displays hook information with a count of entries. It handles null inputs and ensures that all displayed strings are safely formatted to prevent issues with special characters in the CLI.
249-257: Review of methodGetTableforMonitorHookDetails.This method displays details about a monitor hook in a simple format. It handles null inputs effectively and ensures that the description is safely formatted. The method is straightforward and serves its purpose well.
259-271: Review of methodGetTableforIEnumerable<LovItem>.This method displays a list of values with an identifier and name, handling null inputs. It also shows a count of items, which is useful for at-a-glance information about the size of the list.
273-281: Review of methodGetTableforList<MonitorEventModel>.This method displays event information for monitors, handling null inputs and using a forEach loop to add rows efficiently. The method is clear and functional, providing essential information in a straightforward format.
283-291: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<JobBasicDetails>.This method handles paging for job details and includes conditional formatting based on job activity status. It checks for null inputs and data existence, and uses custom formatting to enhance the display of job information.
293-309: Review of methodGetTableforList<RunningJobDetails>.This method displays detailed information about running jobs, including progress and execution details. It handles null inputs and uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a comprehensive view of job execution.
311-357: Review of methodGetTableforRestResponse.This method handles the display of data from a REST response, checking for success status and content existence. It parses JSON content and converts it to a DataTable, handling exceptions gracefully. The method is robust, with detailed error handling and data validation.
Line range hint
359-394: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<JobInstanceLogRow>.This method handles paging and optionally includes detailed job and trigger information. It checks for null inputs and data existence, and uses custom formatting for various data types. The method is flexible and provides detailed information based on user configuration.
396-414: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<JobLastRun>.This method displays the last run details of jobs, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a clear and detailed view of job executions.
416-433: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<HistorySummary>.This method displays historical summaries of job executions, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types and colors to highlight different statuses, enhancing readability and user understanding.
435-448: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<ConcurrentExecutionModel>.This method displays concurrent execution details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for dates and numbers, providing a clear view of system performance.
450-464: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<SecurityAuditModel>.This method displays security audit details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for dates and boolean values, providing a clear and informative view of security events.
466-479: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<LogDetails>.This method displays log details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for log levels and dates, providing a clear and detailed view of system logs.
481-500: Review of methodGetTableforJobCircuitBreaker.This method displays details of a job's circuit breaker, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a clear view of the circuit breaker's status and related metrics.
502-523: Review of methodGetTableforTriggerRowDetails.This method displays trigger details, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a clear and detailed view of trigger configurations and statuses.
525-562: Review of methodGetTableforJobDetails.This method displays detailed job information, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a comprehensive view of job configurations and statuses. The method is well-structured and effectively communicates job details.
564-582: Review of methodGetTableforList<CliClusterNode>.This method displays cluster node details, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a clear and detailed view of cluster configurations and statuses.
584-603: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<MonitorItem>.This method displays monitor item details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a clear and detailed view of monitor configurations and statuses.
605-625: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<MonitorAlertRowModel>.This method displays monitor alert details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a clear and detailed view of monitor alerts and related configurations.
627-635: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<GroupInfo>.This method displays group information, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a clear and detailed view of group configurations and statuses.
637-644: Review of methodGetTableforPagingResponse<UserRowModel>.This method displays user details, handling null inputs and data existence. It uses custom formatting for various data types, providing a clear and detailed view of user configurations and statuses.
647-655: Review of methodGetTableforList<PausedTriggerDetails>.This method displays paused trigger details, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a clear and detailed view of trigger configurations and statuses.
657-665: Review of methodGetTableforList<CliGlobalConfig>.This method displays global configuration details, handling null inputs and using custom formatting for various data types. It provides a clear and detailed view of global configurations and statuses.
667-675: Review of helper methodGetCircuitBreakerStatusLabel.This helper method provides a status label for a circuit breaker, handling null inputs and using custom formatting to indicate the status. It is a small but useful method that enhances the readability of circuit breaker statuses.
677-717: Review of helper methodGetValueForDataTable.This method formats values for display in a data table, handling various data types and null inputs. It uses custom formatting for dates, durations, numbers, and statuses, which helps maintain consistency and readability in data displays.
719-728: Review of helper methodLimitValue.This method limits the length of displayed values to prevent overflow in the CLI. It handles null inputs and uses safe string handling practices. The method is well-implemented and enhances the usability of the CLI by ensuring that displayed values are concise yet informative.
730-737: Review of helper methodSafeCliString.This method safely formats strings for display in the CLI, handling null inputs and whitespace. It replaces tabs with spaces and trims the value, which helps maintain a clean and consistent display format.
739-750: Review of helper methodSerializeJobDetailsData.This method serializes job details data into a string format for display. It handles null inputs and empty data maps, using a YAML serializer for the conversion. The method is well-implemented and provides a clear representation of job data.
752-773: Review of helper methodValidateDataTableColumns.This method validates the columns of a data table, ensuring that they do not exceed a maximum count and do not include forbidden columns. It handles exceptions and provides clear error messages, which enhances the robustness and user-friendliness of the CLI.
src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomainAddPartial.cs (1)
59-63: Verify serialization of circuit breaker configuration.The method uses
metadata.CircuitBreaker.ToString()to store the configuration. Ensure thatToString()is overridden to serialize the object properties correctly, or consider using a specific serialization method like JSON.src/Planar.Service/API/JobDomain.cs (5)
36-77: Review: Enhanced error handling and validation inPutDatamethod.The
PutDatamethod has been significantly refactored to include better error handling and validation:
- It now throws
RestConflictExceptionandRestNotFoundExceptionbased on thePutModeand the existence of the data key, which aligns with the PR objectives to enhance error handling.- The use of
AuditJobSafefor logging updates and additions is a good practice for traceability.- Rescheduling and pausing the job after data modifications ensure that job state is consistent with the latest data.
However, consider the following improvements:
- The method could benefit from splitting into smaller functions for better readability and maintainability.
- Ensure that all possible exceptions are handled or documented, especially around the scheduler interactions which are critical operations.
79-99: Review: StreamlinedClearDatamethod with improved logging and job handling.The
ClearDatamethod improvements are notable:
- It now validates keys before attempting to clear them, which prevents unnecessary operations on invalid keys.
- The rescheduling and pausing logic after clearing data is crucial for maintaining job consistency.
- Enhanced audit logging provides better traceability of operations.
Considerations:
- The method could be optimized by reducing the number of scheduler interactions if possible, as these are typically expensive operations.
- Ensure comprehensive testing around the edge cases, such as no valid keys or scheduler failures.
101-117: Review: UpdatedRemoveDatamethod with robust validation and error handling.The
RemoveDatamethod now includes:
- Strong validation checks before removing data, which is crucial for data integrity.
- Detailed audit logging which enhances the traceability of changes.
- Rescheduling and pausing the job, which is essential to keep the job's execution state synchronized with its data state.
Suggestions:
- As with other data manipulation methods, consider reducing the impact of scheduler interactions by batching or optimizing these operations.
- Additional error handling around scheduler interactions could improve the robustness of the method.
168-182: Review: Enhanced retrieval logic inGetmethod with comprehensive error handling.The
Getmethod has been improved to:
- Throw a
RestNotFoundExceptionif the job does not exist, which provides clear feedback to the caller.- Map job details more comprehensively, ensuring that all relevant information is returned.
Improvement suggestions:
- The method could potentially cache frequently accessed data to improve performance, especially if job details are requested often.
- Consider adding more detailed logging around the retrieval process to aid in debugging and monitoring.
498-582: Review: Implementation of long-polling inGetRunningInstanceLongPollingmethods.The new long-polling functionality in
GetRunningInstanceLongPollingmethods is a significant addition:
- These methods handle real-time updates efficiently, providing immediate feedback to the client.
- The use of cancellation tokens and time-based checks are best practices for long-polling implementations.
However, there are areas for improvement:
- The methods could be refactored to reduce duplication and improve clarity. The logic for checking updates is repeated and could be extracted into a helper method.
- Error handling could be more descriptive, especially in timeout scenarios, to provide better context to the client.
src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs (1)
123-127: Enhancement: Adjust job display logic inChooseJoboverload.This overload of
ChooseJobnow takes aList<JobBasicDetails>and abool groupMenu. It uses thegroupMenuto decide whether to display jobs directly or to group them first. This is a logical extension of the previous method's changes and helps maintain consistency across the user interface.
- Correctness: The method correctly checks the
groupMenuflag and the number of jobs before deciding the display method.- Maintainability: The method is straightforward and aligns with the changes in the main
ChooseJobmethod.Ensure that the
ShowGroupsMenuandShowJobsMenumethods are optimized for handling potentially large datasets.Verification successful
Verification Complete: Methods are Efficiently Implemented
The
ShowGroupsMenuandShowJobsMenumethods use LINQ for ordering and filtering, which is efficient for handling collections. The current implementation does not show any obvious performance issues. The review comment's suggestion to ensure optimization is valid, but the methods appear to be well-implemented for typical use cases.
- ShowGroupsMenu: Orders and removes duplicates from a list of strings.
- ShowJobsMenu: Filters and orders a list of
JobBasicDetailsbased on group name.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the performance of ShowGroupsMenu and ShowJobsMenu with large datasets. echo "Performance checks need to be conducted manually or with specific profiling tools available in the development environment."Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of ShowGroupsMenu and ShowJobsMenu methods in the codebase. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'void ShowGroupsMenu($$$) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'void ShowJobsMenu($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for any occurrences of ShowGroupsMenu and ShowJobsMenu in the codebase. rg 'ShowGroupsMenu' rg 'ShowJobsMenu'Length of output: 712
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementations of ShowGroupsMenu and ShowJobsMenu from the JobCliActions.cs file for analysis. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'private static string? ShowGroupsMenu(IEnumerable<string> data) { $$$ }' ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern 'private static string ShowJobsMenu(IEnumerable<JobBasicDetails> data, string? groupName = null) { $$$ }'Length of output: 249
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use rg to search for the method definitions of ShowGroupsMenu and ShowJobsMenu in the JobCliActions.cs file. rg 'private static string\?? ShowGroupsMenu' src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs -A 20 rg 'private static string ShowJobsMenu' src/Planar.CLI/Actions/JobCliActions.cs -A 20Length of output: 1597
| public class JobCircuitBreaker | ||
| { | ||
| public int FailureThreshold { get; set; } | ||
| public int SuccessThreshold { get; set; } | ||
| public TimeSpan? PauseSpan { get; set; } | ||
| public int FailCounter { get; set; } | ||
| public int SuccessCounter { get; set; } | ||
| public DateTime? WillBeResetAt { get; set; } | ||
| public DateTime? ActivatedAt { get; set; } | ||
| public bool Activated => ActivatedAt.HasValue; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of the JobCircuitBreaker class design
The JobCircuitBreaker class is well-structured for its intended use in managing state related to the circuit breaker pattern. Here are some observations and suggestions:
-
Encapsulation and Validation:
- Currently, all properties are auto-implemented with public getters and setters. This is convenient but does not prevent invalid states. For example, negative values for
FailureThreshold,SuccessThreshold,FailCounter, andSuccessCountermight not be valid. - Consider adding validation in the setters to ensure the integrity of the data.
- Currently, all properties are auto-implemented with public getters and setters. This is convenient but does not prevent invalid states. For example, negative values for
-
Nullability of
TimeSpan? PauseSpan:- The use of nullable
TimeSpanforPauseSpanis appropriate as it allows for the possibility of not defining a pause. However, ensure that the consuming code handles this nullability correctly.
- The use of nullable
-
Read-Only Property
Activated:- The
Activatedproperty is effectively leveraging C#'s computed property feature to determine if the circuit breaker is active. This is a clean and efficient use of the language feature.
- The
-
DateTime Properties:
WillBeResetAtandActivatedAtare nullable, which is suitable for optional timestamps. Ensure that any logic that consumes these properties handles their null state appropriately.
Overall, the class is functionally sound but could benefit from enhanced data validation to prevent misuse or errors in the application logic.
| public class JobCircuitBreaker | ||
| { | ||
| public int FailureThreshold { get; set; } | ||
| public int SuccessThreshold { get; set; } | ||
| public TimeSpan? PauseSpan { get; set; } | ||
| public int FailCounter { get; set; } | ||
| public int SuccessCounter { get; set; } | ||
| public DateTime? WillBeResetAt { get; set; } | ||
| public DateTime? ActivatedAt { get; set; } | ||
| public bool Activated => ActivatedAt.HasValue; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add XML documentation comments for public class and properties.
The JobCircuitBreaker class is well-structured for its intended purpose, encapsulating the state of a circuit breaker effectively. However, it lacks XML documentation comments, which are essential for public classes and properties to ensure they are used correctly by other developers.
Consider adding documentation comments above each property and the class definition itself to describe their purpose and usage. This will enhance maintainability and clarity, especially important in a public API context.
| @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@ public class JobDetails : JobBasicDetails | |||
|
|
|||
| public string Properties { get; set; } = string.Empty; | |||
|
|
|||
| public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = new(); | |||
| public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = []; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the syntax error in the initialization of DataMap.
The shorthand [] is not valid for initializing a SortedDictionary in C#. The correct shorthand is new().
Please revert this change to:
- public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = [];
+ public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = new();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = []; | |
| public SortedDictionary<string, string?> DataMap { get; set; } = new(); |
|
|
||
| public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = new(); | ||
| public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the syntax error in the initialization of CronTriggers.
The shorthand [] is not valid for initializing a List in C#. The correct shorthand is new().
Please revert this change to:
- public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = [];
+ public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = new();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = []; | |
| public List<CronTriggerDetails> CronTriggers { get; set; } = new(); |
|
|
||
| public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = new(); | ||
| public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the syntax error in the initialization of SimpleTriggers.
The shorthand [] is not valid for initializing a List in C#. The correct shorthand is new().
Please revert this change to:
- public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = [];
+ public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = new();Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = []; | |
| public List<SimpleTriggerDetails> SimpleTriggers { get; set; } = new(); |
| private static void Load() | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| const string purpose = "RememberConnect"; | ||
| var serviceCollection = new ServiceCollection(); | ||
| serviceCollection.AddDataProtection(); | ||
| var provider = serviceCollection.BuildServiceProvider(); | ||
| var protector = provider.GetRequiredService<IDataProtectionProvider>(); | ||
| return protector.CreateProtector(purpose); | ||
| if (!File.Exists(MetadataFilename)) { return; } | ||
| var text = File.ReadAllText(MetadataFilename); | ||
| var protector = GetProtector(); | ||
| text = protector.Unprotect(text); | ||
| Data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<UserMetadata>(text) ?? new UserMetadata(); | ||
| if (Data.Logins == null) { Data.Logins = []; } | ||
| LogoutOldItems(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static void HandleException(Exception ex) | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| AnsiConsole.MarkupLine($"{CliFormat.GetWarningMarkup("fail to read/write saved logins info")}"); | ||
| AnsiConsole.MarkupLine($"[{CliFormat.WarningColor}]exception message: {ex.Message.EscapeMarkup()}[/]"); | ||
| AnsiConsole.WriteLine(string.Empty.PadLeft(80, '-')); | ||
| AnsiConsole.WriteException(ex); | ||
| HandleException(ex); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refined Load method
The Load method has been redefined to improve readability and maintainability. The use of data protection to secure the serialized data is a good security practice. However, the method could handle potential JSON deserialization issues more gracefully.
Enhance error handling in the Load method to gracefully manage JSON deserialization errors and provide more informative error messages.
| public async Task<ITrigger?> GetCircuitBreakerTrigger(JobKey jobKey) | ||
| { | ||
| var trigger = await _scheduler.GetTrigger(new TriggerKey($"Resume.{jobKey}", Consts.CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup)); | ||
| return trigger; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Extract trigger group name to a constant for better maintainability.
The method GetCircuitBreakerTrigger uses a hard-coded string for the trigger group name. Consider extracting this to a constant to improve maintainability and avoid potential errors in multiple usages.
- var trigger = await _scheduler.GetTrigger(new TriggerKey($"Resume.{jobKey}", Consts.CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup));
+ const string CircuitBreakerTriggerGroupName = "CircuitBreakerTriggerGroup";
+ var trigger = await _scheduler.GetTrigger(new TriggerKey($"Resume.{jobKey}", CircuitBreakerTriggerGroupName));Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| public static string GetJobTypeName(IJobDetail source) | ||
| { | ||
| const string system = "SystemJob"; | ||
| if (JobKeyHelper.IsSystemJobKey(source.Key)) | ||
| { | ||
| return system; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return GetJobTypeName(source.JobType); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct recursive call and verify property usage in GetJobTypeName.
The method GetJobTypeName attempts to call itself recursively using source.JobType, which is not a valid property of IJobDetail. This seems to be a typo or an incorrect implementation. Please verify the correct property to use or adjust the logic accordingly.
- return GetJobTypeName(source.JobType);
+ // Assuming `JobType` should be obtained differently, please verify the correct approach
+ return GetJobTypeName(source.SomeOtherProperty);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| public static CliTable GetCalendarsTable(IEnumerable<string>? items) | ||
| { | ||
| var table = new CliTable(); | ||
| if (items == null || !items.Any()) { return table; } | ||
|
|
||
| for (int x = 0; x < rows; x++) | ||
| { | ||
| for (int y = 0; y < columns; y++) | ||
| { | ||
| matrix[x, y] = array[index]; | ||
| index++; | ||
| if (index >= array.Length) { break; } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| var array = items.ToArray(); | ||
| const int columns = 5; | ||
| var rows = Convert.ToInt32(Math.Ceiling(array.Length / (columns * 1.0))); | ||
|
|
||
| table.Table.AddColumns(new int[columns * 2].Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); | ||
| table.Table.HideHeaders(); | ||
| int index = 0; | ||
| string[,] matrix = new string[rows, columns]; | ||
|
|
||
| index = 0; | ||
| for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++) | ||
| for (int x = 0; x < rows; x++) | ||
| { | ||
| for (int y = 0; y < columns; y++) | ||
| { | ||
| var rowItems = new string[columns * 2]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| var value = matrix[r, i].EscapeMarkup() ?? string.Empty; | ||
| var number = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) ? string.Empty : (++index).ToString(); | ||
| rowItems[i * 2] = number; | ||
| rowItems[i * 2 + 1] = value; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| table.Table.AddRow(rowItems); | ||
| matrix[x, y] = array[index]; | ||
| index++; | ||
| if (index >= array.Length) { break; } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return table; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static CliTable GetMetadataTable<T>() where T : class | ||
| table.Table.AddColumns(new int[columns * 2].Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); | ||
| table.Table.HideHeaders(); | ||
|
|
||
| index = 0; | ||
| for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++) | ||
| { | ||
| var table = new CliTable(); | ||
| table.Table.AddColumns("Property Name", "Type"); | ||
| var properties = typeof(T).GetProperties(); | ||
| foreach (var p in properties) | ||
| var rowItems = new string[columns * 2]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| var type = p.PropertyType.IsGenericType ? p.PropertyType.GenericTypeArguments[0].Name : p.PropertyType.Name; | ||
| if (type == nameof(DateTime)) { type = nameof(DateTimeOffset); } | ||
| table.Table.AddRow(p.Name, type); | ||
| var value = matrix[r, i].EscapeMarkup() ?? string.Empty; | ||
| var number = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) ? string.Empty : (++index).ToString(); | ||
| rowItems[i * 2] = number; | ||
| rowItems[i * 2 + 1] = value; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return table; | ||
| table.Table.AddRow(rowItems); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public static CliTable GetTable(AddUserResponse? response) | ||
| { | ||
| var table = new CliTable(); | ||
| table.Table.AddColumns("Password"); | ||
|
|
||
| if (response == null) { return table; } | ||
| table.Table.AddRow(SafeCliString(response.Password)); | ||
| table.Table.AddEmptyRow(); | ||
| table.Table.AddRow(CliFormat.GetWarningMarkup("make sure you copy the above password now.")); | ||
| table.Table.AddRow($"[{CliFormat.WarningColor}]we don't store it and you will not be able to see it again.[/]"); | ||
| return table; | ||
| } | ||
| return table; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of method GetCalendarsTable.
This method constructs a CliTable from an enumerable of strings. The logic includes handling null or empty inputs, which is good for robustness. The method uses a matrix to format the data into a table, which is a clear and effective approach. However, there's a potential issue with the index increment in the nested loop which could lead to an IndexOutOfRangeException if not carefully managed.
Consider adding a check before incrementing the index to ensure it does not exceed the array length.
Suggest adding a safety check for the index:
- index++;
- if (index >= array.Length) { break; }
+ if (++index >= array.Length) { break; }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public static CliTable GetCalendarsTable(IEnumerable<string>? items) | |
| { | |
| var table = new CliTable(); | |
| if (items == null || !items.Any()) { return table; } | |
| for (int x = 0; x < rows; x++) | |
| { | |
| for (int y = 0; y < columns; y++) | |
| { | |
| matrix[x, y] = array[index]; | |
| index++; | |
| if (index >= array.Length) { break; } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| var array = items.ToArray(); | |
| const int columns = 5; | |
| var rows = Convert.ToInt32(Math.Ceiling(array.Length / (columns * 1.0))); | |
| table.Table.AddColumns(new int[columns * 2].Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); | |
| table.Table.HideHeaders(); | |
| int index = 0; | |
| string[,] matrix = new string[rows, columns]; | |
| index = 0; | |
| for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++) | |
| for (int x = 0; x < rows; x++) | |
| { | |
| for (int y = 0; y < columns; y++) | |
| { | |
| var rowItems = new string[columns * 2]; | |
| for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) | |
| { | |
| var value = matrix[r, i].EscapeMarkup() ?? string.Empty; | |
| var number = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) ? string.Empty : (++index).ToString(); | |
| rowItems[i * 2] = number; | |
| rowItems[i * 2 + 1] = value; | |
| } | |
| table.Table.AddRow(rowItems); | |
| matrix[x, y] = array[index]; | |
| index++; | |
| if (index >= array.Length) { break; } | |
| } | |
| return table; | |
| } | |
| public static CliTable GetMetadataTable<T>() where T : class | |
| table.Table.AddColumns(new int[columns * 2].Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); | |
| table.Table.HideHeaders(); | |
| index = 0; | |
| for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++) | |
| { | |
| var table = new CliTable(); | |
| table.Table.AddColumns("Property Name", "Type"); | |
| var properties = typeof(T).GetProperties(); | |
| foreach (var p in properties) | |
| var rowItems = new string[columns * 2]; | |
| for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) | |
| { | |
| var type = p.PropertyType.IsGenericType ? p.PropertyType.GenericTypeArguments[0].Name : p.PropertyType.Name; | |
| if (type == nameof(DateTime)) { type = nameof(DateTimeOffset); } | |
| table.Table.AddRow(p.Name, type); | |
| var value = matrix[r, i].EscapeMarkup() ?? string.Empty; | |
| var number = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) ? string.Empty : (++index).ToString(); | |
| rowItems[i * 2] = number; | |
| rowItems[i * 2 + 1] = value; | |
| } | |
| return table; | |
| table.Table.AddRow(rowItems); | |
| } | |
| public static CliTable GetTable(AddUserResponse? response) | |
| { | |
| var table = new CliTable(); | |
| table.Table.AddColumns("Password"); | |
| if (response == null) { return table; } | |
| table.Table.AddRow(SafeCliString(response.Password)); | |
| table.Table.AddEmptyRow(); | |
| table.Table.AddRow(CliFormat.GetWarningMarkup("make sure you copy the above password now.")); | |
| table.Table.AddRow($"[{CliFormat.WarningColor}]we don't store it and you will not be able to see it again.[/]"); | |
| return table; | |
| } | |
| return table; | |
| } | |
| public static CliTable GetCalendarsTable(IEnumerable<string>? items) | |
| { | |
| var table = new CliTable(); | |
| if (items == null || !items.Any()) { return table; } | |
| var array = items.ToArray(); | |
| const int columns = 5; | |
| var rows = Convert.ToInt32(Math.Ceiling(array.Length / (columns * 1.0))); | |
| int index = 0; | |
| string[,] matrix = new string[rows, columns]; | |
| for (int x = 0; x < rows; x++) | |
| { | |
| for (int y = 0; y < columns; y++) | |
| { | |
| matrix[x, y] = array[index]; | |
| if (++index >= array.Length) { break; } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| table.Table.AddColumns(new int[columns * 2].Select(i => i.ToString()).ToArray()); | |
| table.Table.HideHeaders(); | |
| index = 0; | |
| for (int r = 0; r < rows; r++) | |
| { | |
| var rowItems = new string[columns * 2]; | |
| for (int i = 0; i < columns; i++) | |
| { | |
| var value = matrix[r, i].EscapeMarkup() ?? string.Empty; | |
| var number = string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) ? string.Empty : (++index).ToString(); | |
| rowItems[i * 2] = number; | |
| rowItems[i * 2 + 1] = value; | |
| } | |
| table.Table.AddRow(rowItems); | |
| } | |
| return table; | |
| } |
| #region circuit breaker | ||
|
|
||
| ValidateRangeValue(metadata.CircuitBreaker.FailureThreshold, 2, 100, "failure threshold", "circuit breaker"); | ||
| ValidateRangeValue(metadata.CircuitBreaker.SuccessThreshold, 1, 100, "success threshold", "circuit breaker"); | ||
| if (metadata.CircuitBreaker.PauseSpan.HasValue && metadata.CircuitBreaker.PauseSpan.Value.TotalMinutes < 5) | ||
| { | ||
| throw new RestValidationException( | ||
| nameof(metadata.CircuitBreaker.PauseSpan).ToLower(), | ||
| $"circuit breaker pause span value is invalid. minimum value is 5 minutes"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (metadata.CircuitBreaker.SuccessThreshold >= metadata.CircuitBreaker.FailureThreshold) | ||
| { | ||
| throw new RestValidationException( | ||
| nameof(metadata.CircuitBreaker.SuccessThreshold).ToLower(), | ||
| $"circuit breaker success threshold value is invalid. success threshold must be less than failure threshold"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #endregion circuit breaker | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve the validation logic for circuit breakers.
The validation logic for FailureThreshold, SuccessThreshold, and PauseSpan is correctly implemented. Consider adding unit tests to cover these scenarios to ensure the validations work as expected.
Would you like me to help by generating unit test cases for these validations?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CircuitBreakerTesterwith detailed job settings, including failure thresholds and triggers.CircuitBreakerTesterproject.JobCircuitBreakerclass to manage job execution based on success and failure thresholds.Dependency Updates