-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 399
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
build: use react 18 #2344
build: use react 18 #2344
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
"react-codemirror2": "^7.2.1", | ||
"react-colorful": "^5.4.0", | ||
"react-day-picker": "^7.4.10", | ||
"react-dom": "17.0.1", | ||
"react-dom": "18.2.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re-frame-10x is using the old bootstrap and will error on startup, but I think it might be ok? See day8/re-frame-10x#367
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@filipesilva does this issue cause everything to fall back to 17? I assumed it would.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so. Just that instantiation of react rendering, I think. You can have multiple react "instances" on the same page, controller different parts of the html, without interacting with each other.
chore: update chakra
It will show a react 18 warning on dev, but it is harmless.
158bbfb
to
e02abe2
Compare
We're not really using it anymore.
Revert "Merge pull request #2344 from filipesilva/react-18"
No description provided.