Refactor teamsNotifier, emailNotifier

[atc0005]

Both of these functions are nearly identical with the exception of the parameter list (just one?) and the anonymous function called within to perform the actual notification.

One route I tinkered with was creating a common settings "bundle" within the notifications manager and passing that bundle into two instances of a common notifier function. Another approach is to have only a single instance, but apply checks within to determine if notification type should be attempted.

Regardless of the final outcome, the initial implementation on the bench for #21 duplicates nearly 1:1 the content of teamsNotifier and emailNotifier functions and this is a strong code smell.

[atc0005]

Thought: Create an actual Go type for each notification type (e.g., email, teams, ...)?

[atc0005]

The timeoutValue could be calculated outside of the worker and passed to the specific notifier instance. This would be another example of keeping config package references concentrated within the StartNotifyMgr function.

timeoutValue := config.GetTimeout(
	sendTimeout,
	nextScheduledNotification,
	retries,
	retriesDelay,
)

The timeout, delays, etc currently unique to a specific notifier could also be handled in a similar manner.

[atc0005]

Hearing about how database drivers "register" with the sql package via init side-effects makes me think about using a registration system here. It could help with a number of checks that are currently wired in that look to see whether notifications are enabled.

Example:

// If we don't have *any* notifications enabled we will just
// discard the item we have pulled from the channel
if !cfg.NotifyEmail() && !cfg.NotifyTeams() {
	// ...
}

[atc0005]

see also atc0005/brick#4