Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: testing for notify_triagers #3476

Conversation

sambhavgupta0705
Copy link
Member

@sambhavgupta0705 sambhavgupta0705 commented Dec 16, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the guide on validating AsyncAPI documents for clarity.
    • Expanded the section on linting practices, introducing the Spectral tool with installation and setup instructions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sambhavgupta0705 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c440a3 and 46d76a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/community/HomeCard.tsx (1 hunks)
  • markdown/docs/guides/validate.md (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the "Validate AsyncAPI" documentation guide, focusing on refining language and expanding guidance around validation practices. The changes primarily involve enhancing the introduction, maintaining existing validation method descriptions, and providing more detailed information about linting practices using the Spectral tool. The document now offers a clearer and more comprehensive overview of AsyncAPI validation techniques.

Changes

File Change Summary
markdown/docs/guides/validate.md - Refined introduction by removing redundant word "documents"
- Preserved existing validation method descriptions
- Expanded section on linting practices
- Added Spectral tool installation and configuration guidance
- Included example of custom rule for title capitalization

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Validation's dance, a rabbit's delight,
Spectral rules shining ever so bright
AsyncAPI docs, now crisp and clean
Linting magic on our coding scene
Hop to perfection, with rules so neat! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 46d76a5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/675feef0013a8700086cea5b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3476--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
markdown/docs/guides/validate.md (1)

Line range hint 82-117: Fix Spectral configuration examples format

The Spectral configuration examples use invalid JSON format with JavaScript-style comments. They should use valid JSON format.

Here's the corrected format:

-    {
-      "rules": {
-        // add your own rules here
-      }
-    }
+    {
+      "rules": {
+      }
+    }

And for the second example:

-  {
-      "rules": {
-          "valid-document-version": {
-              "message": "Application title must start with upper case",
-              "severity": "error",
-              "given": "$.info",
-              "then": [
-                  {
-                      "field": "title",
-                      "function": "pattern",
-                      "functionOptions": {
-                          "match": "^[A-Z]"
-                      }
-                  }
-              ]
-          }
-      }
-  }
+    {
+      "rules": {
+        "valid-document-version": {
+          "message": "Application title must start with upper case",
+          "severity": "error",
+          "given": "$.info",
+          "then": [
+            {
+              "field": "title",
+              "function": "pattern",
+              "functionOptions": {
+                "match": "^[A-Z]"
+              }
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
markdown/docs/guides/validate.md (2)

8-8: Fix grammatical error in introduction

Remove the extra space before the period and consider adding back "documents" for clarity.

-In this guide, you'll learn multiple ways to validate AsyncAPI .
+In this guide, you'll learn multiple ways to validate AsyncAPI documents.

Line range hint 77-78: Add context about Spectral configuration file placement

The documentation should specify where to place the .spectral.yaml file and explain its scope (global vs project-level configuration).

Consider adding this explanation:

 2. Create a file named `.spectral.yaml` to begin writing your API description and document rules. 
+    Place this file in your project root directory for project-specific rules, or in your home directory for global rules.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 00cb653 and 2c440a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/guides/validate.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
markdown/docs/guides/validate.md (1)

Line range hint 125-129: Verify external resource links

Let's ensure all referenced documentation links are accessible.

✅ Verification successful

All external resource links are valid and accessible

All referenced documentation links in the Additional resources section return HTTP 200 status codes, confirming they are accessible:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all external links in the Additional resources section are accessible

# Extract and verify URLs from the markdown file
urls=(
  "https://github.com/asyncapi/studio#readme"
  "https://github.com/asyncapi/cli#readme"
  "https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-js#readme"
  "https://github.com/asyncapi/parser-go#readme"
)

for url in "${urls[@]}"; do
  echo "Checking $url"
  curl -s -L -I "$url" | head -n 1
done

Length of output: 1075

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.59%. Comparing base (1812dab) to head (46d76a5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3476   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.59%   86.59%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines         664      664           
=======================================
  Hits          575      575           
  Misses         89       89           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Dec 16, 2024

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 47
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3476--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants