Skip to content

Actions: asyncapi/spec

Actions

Please take a Look

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
please-take-a-look-command.yml
207 workflow runs
207 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

application issue Please take a Look #207: Issue comment #1079 (comment) created by Anam-shaikh2003
November 24, 2024 16:28 3s
November 24, 2024 16:28 3s
application issue Please take a Look #206: Issue comment #1079 (comment) created by adityakalburgi
November 24, 2024 10:28 3s
November 24, 2024 10:28 3s
Ensure consistency when using either Application or API terms Please take a Look #205: Issue comment #949 (comment) created by Anam-shaikh2003
November 23, 2024 17:50 4s
November 23, 2024 17:50 4s
Consolidate the JSON and YAML examples in the specs into one codeblock to reduce the readers scroll effort Please take a Look #204: Issue comment #1067 (comment) created by AaryaBalwadkar
November 17, 2024 07:24 4s
November 17, 2024 07:24 4s
Add message type to describe Event/Command/Other Please take a Look #203: Issue comment #1074 (comment) created by ishyverma
November 16, 2024 16:16 4s
November 16, 2024 16:16 4s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @asyncapi/parser in /scripts/validation Please take a Look #202: Issue comment #1078 (comment) created by sonarcloud bot
November 12, 2024 16:44 6s
November 12, 2024 16:44 6s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @stoplight/spectral-core in /scripts/converter Please take a Look #201: Issue comment #1077 (comment) created by sonarcloud bot
November 12, 2024 16:42 5s
November 12, 2024 16:42 5s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @asyncapi/parser in /scripts/converter Please take a Look #200: Issue comment #1076 (comment) created by sonarcloud bot
November 12, 2024 12:08 3s
November 12, 2024 12:08 3s
ci: update update-maintainers-trigger.yaml workflow from global .github repo Please take a Look #199: Issue comment #1075 (comment) created by sonarcloud bot
November 12, 2024 12:05 3s
November 12, 2024 12:05 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #198: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
November 10, 2024 11:44 4s
November 10, 2024 11:44 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #197: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
November 8, 2024 12:21 3s
November 8, 2024 12:21 3s
Need for fine-grained per-channel authn/authz Please take a Look #196: Issue comment #306 (comment) created by derberg
November 4, 2024 16:11 4s
November 4, 2024 16:11 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #195: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
November 4, 2024 13:25 5s
November 4, 2024 13:25 5s
Need for fine-grained per-channel authn/authz Please take a Look #194: Issue comment #306 (comment) created by devthejo
October 27, 2024 13:06 2s
October 27, 2024 13:06 2s
Add minimal support for v3 code generation Please take a Look #193: Issue comment #954 (comment) created by vordimous
October 22, 2024 16:37 4s
October 22, 2024 16:37 4s
trait vs. allOf ref vs. component ref - CloudEvents Please take a Look #192: Issue comment #1057 (comment) created by black-snow
October 19, 2024 09:05 3s
October 19, 2024 09:05 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #191: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
October 14, 2024 08:40 3s
October 14, 2024 08:40 3s
Please take a Look Please take a Look #190: created by catosaurusrex2003
October 12, 2024 14:25 3s
October 12, 2024 14:25 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #189: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 12, 2024 10:24 2s
October 12, 2024 10:24 2s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #188: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
October 11, 2024 15:16 5s
October 11, 2024 15:16 5s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #187: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 4, 2024 09:30 3s
October 4, 2024 09:30 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #186: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by derberg
October 3, 2024 22:48 3s
October 3, 2024 22:48 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #185: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 2, 2024 22:26 4s
October 2, 2024 22:26 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #184: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by derberg
October 2, 2024 15:51 4s
October 2, 2024 15:51 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Please take a Look #183: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 1, 2024 17:34 4s
October 1, 2024 17:34 4s