Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: create definitions for 2.5.0 version of the Spec #230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2022

Conversation

smoya
Copy link
Member

@smoya smoya commented Jun 17, 2022

Description

This PR creates the new 2.5.0 definition files (no new features, just a ""copy"" of 2.4.0)

Related issue(s)
asyncapi/spec#654 (comment)

@smoya smoya changed the title feat: create definitions for 2.5.0 version of the Spec chore: create definitions for 2.5.0 version of the Spec Jun 17, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@smoya
Copy link
Member Author

smoya commented Jun 23, 2022

@derberg @fmvilas @dalelane @jonaslagoni this is ready to be reviewed

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Jun 23, 2022

Thanks @smoya for handling all of it 🙏🏼

@smoya
Copy link
Member Author

smoya commented Jun 23, 2022

/rtm

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit 7358f48 into asyncapi:next-spec Jun 23, 2022
@smoya smoya deleted the next-spec branch June 23, 2022 15:49
@char0n char0n mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2022
61 tasks
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.15.0-next-spec.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.2.0-next-spec.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants