Add parameter singleFile

[GordeevArt]

Motivation: publicate asyncapi into services that accept only single documents.

Add parameter singleFile to get html with scripts and styles in one file.

"singleFile": {
        "description": "If set this parameter to true generate single html file with scripts and styles inside",
        "required": false,
        "default": false
      }

Make something like this in index.html:

  {% if params.singleFile %}
    <style type="text/css">
    {% include "template/css/tailwind.min.css" %}
    </style>
    <style type="text/css">
    {% include "template/css/atom-one-dark.min.css" %}
    </style>
    <style type="text/css">
    {% include "template/css/main.css" %}
    </style>
  {% else %}
  <link href="css/tailwind.min.css" rel="stylesheet">
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/atom-one-dark.min.css" />
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css" />
  {% endif %}

  {% if params.singleFile %}
    <script defer type="text/javascript">
    {% include "template/js/highlight.min.js" %}

    {% include "template/js/main.js" %}
    </script>
  {% else %}
  <script src="js/highlight.min.js" type="application/javascript"></script>
  <script src="js/main.js" type="application/javascript"></script>
  {% endif %}

[derberg]

@GordeevArt looks good to me, I like it, I think that one day someone asked about it. Did you think about creating a PR for it. The only missing part I see is to add a hook that would react to this parameter and would remove all unnecessary files from the output directory, something similar to https://github.com/asyncapi/java-spring-template/blob/master/hooks/02_removeNotRelevantParts.js. You can access params in hooks -> const params = generator.templateParams; and then something like params.singleFile === 'true'

[GordeevArt]

@derberg there is a problem with --watch-template when removing the directories by the hooks. Infinite recreating.

[derberg]

@GordeevArt crap, could you please report a bug here?

[GordeevArt]

@derberg yep. What about unpassed checks? https://github.com/asyncapi/html-template/pull/62/checks

How can it be fixed?

[derberg]

@GordeevArt our pipelines are based on GitHub Actions and when we added them, they did not support nicely fork workflows. Welcome message could not be posted by the bot as on the PR from fork it has only read GitHub Token. They changed it now and introduced an alternative pull request event that takes GitHub workflows files from the upstream and not the fork (which makes it secure to assign read/write token. We just didn’t have time to update our workflows in all our repositories. I hope I explained it well.

In theory, it is enough to replace this with pull_request_target but I didn't have time yet to test it

[GordeevArt]

@derberg thanks it helps. Waiting for merge.

[asyncapi-bot]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.11.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀