Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite to TS #106

Closed
Tracked by #110
magicmatatjahu opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #115
Closed
Tracked by #110

Rewrite to TS #106

magicmatatjahu opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #115
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released

Comments

@magicmatatjahu
Copy link
Member

As most of our tools in which we use converter are written in TS I think it would be a good idea to rewrite converter to TS. The library itself is quite small so it shouldn't be a problem. On the plus side, we will have types for Studio/ServerAPI/CLI.

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 22, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.10.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants