-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add topicConfiguration property to channel object #171
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
overall, I really like this - I think it's going to be super helpful.
I have a few minor nit-picks over how we word the constraints, but just trying to make sure we phrase it in a way that is easy for anyone to understand.
My only real concern is about the inclusion of cleanup.policy - I'm not sure whether clients really need to know about this one.
@dalelane, thanks for your fast and very good review 👍 . I've updated the README.md to always point to the kafka documentation for constraints. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - thanks!
@lbroudoux - what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Is there anything left to do here? Are any more approvals needed? I'm unsure of the proceedings 😏 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Love your proposition!!
@thake Sorry for the delay and thanks for your PR. I really like your proposition: it adds useful complements! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚢 🚢
@dalelane @KhudaDad414 All checks are green. I think we're good for merging! Let me know so that I can proceed. |
/rtm |
resolves #163 by introducing a new
topicConfiguration
property to the channel object.