-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ERA001): detect commented out case
statements, add more one-line support
#10055
fix(ERA001): detect commented out case
statements, add more one-line support
#10055
Conversation
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ fn is_standalone_comment(line: &str) -> bool { | |||
for char in line.chars() { | |||
if char == '#' { | |||
return true; | |||
} else if !char.is_whitespace() { | |||
} | |||
if !char.is_whitespace() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was this change intentional? Just checking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but I can revert! Just was a style lint in VSCode
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static HASH_NUMBER: Lazy<Regex> = Lazy::new(|| Regex::new(r"#\d").unwrap()); | |||
static POSITIVE_CASES: Lazy<RegexSet> = Lazy::new(|| { | |||
RegexSet::new([ | |||
// Keywords | |||
r"^(?:elif\s+.*\s*:|else\s*:|try\s*:|finally\s*:|except\s+.*\s*:)$", | |||
r"^(?:elif\s+.*\s*:|else\s*:|try\s*:|finally\s*:|except\s+.*\s*:|case\s+.*\s*:.*)$", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
note: this group ends with .*
to detect the one-line case:
case "hi": print()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like the other cases don't catch that -- can you try to add a test case with try
followed by a one-line body?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep - I think this will catch more non-code statements though like "to try: use iterators" or something. I'll write some tests to see
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok seems to work well, should I add .*
for all of the cases, and add tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's remove the trailing .*
from this PR, and we can open a separate PR to add .*
to all of the cases. It'll make it easier to approve and merge these as separate changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool will do
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry, I meant the opposite: can we remove the .*
from here, so that we don't support one-line for any of the patterns (like before this PR), and then open a separate PR that adds the .*
to all of them at once?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, that's what I understood you to mean! I'll do that and open an issue to add .*
in another PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done! Ticket opened, I'll open that PR next.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, that's what I understood you to mean! I'll do that and open an issue to add .* in another PR
(Oops, sorry, I think I was looking at the code, and thought you'd already pushed!)
case
statements, add more one-line support
Thank you! |
…e support (astral-sh#10055) ## Summary Closes astral-sh#10031 - Detect commented out `case` statements. Playground repro: https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23 - Add more support for one-line commented out code. ## Test Plan Unit tested and tested with ```sh cargo run -p ruff -- check crates/ruff_linter/resources/test/fixtures/eradicate/ERA001.py --no-cache --preview --select ERA001 ``` TODO: - [x] `cargo insta test`
Summary
Closes #10031
case
statements. Playground repro: https://play.ruff.rs/5a305aa9-6e5c-4fa4-999a-8fc427ab9a23Test Plan
Unit tested and tested with
TODO:
cargo insta test