-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement PLE0206 #1005
Implement PLE0206 #1005
Conversation
if decorator_list.iter().any(|d| match &d.node { | ||
ExprKind::Name { id, .. } if id == "property" => true, | ||
_ => false, | ||
}) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe also check checker.is_builtin(property)
?
Signed-off-by: harupy <[email protected]>
Rock! Nice work. |
Oh wait, I think this should be |
@charliermarsh I misunderstood the naming rule. Yes, it should be |
@harupy - Sorry, I wasn't super clear. What do you think of that convention? I wanted to preserve the |
That convention sounds good to me :) If we use |
Oh hah, true! |
I'll rename this check and push it straight to |
Oh nm! Thank you! |
#970