please allow boolean positional arguments (FBT001, FBT002) in case of @override

[ZeeD]

While generally useful, the rules FBT001 and FBT002 may trigger errors if applied to an ovverriden method.

In my case I'm extending a class from a 3rd part library, and I need to override some methods with "naked booleans".

I got the FBT00? errors by ruff in my code, but if I fix them, the original class doesn't work anymore because there are calls to the methods passing the booleans positionally, and they are out of my control.

[Avasam]

Same reasoning as #3910 and #6958

[charliermarsh]

Makes sense.

[ZeeD]

Thanks!