-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for PEP 701 in the parser #7043
Comments
5 tasks
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 14, 2023
## Summary This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. ### Grammar Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. ### `string.rs` This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ### `Constant::kind` changed in the AST ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> ### Errors With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. ## Test Plan 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. ## Benchmarks #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
This was
linked to
pull requests
Sep 15, 2023
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 18, 2023
## Summary This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. ### Grammar Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. ### `string.rs` This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ### `Constant::kind` changed in the AST ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> ### Errors With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. ## Test Plan 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. ## Benchmarks #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 19, 2023
## Summary This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. ### Grammar Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. ### `string.rs` This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ### `Constant::kind` changed in the AST ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> ### Errors With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. ## Test Plan 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. ## Benchmarks #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2023
## Summary This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. ### Grammar Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. ### `string.rs` This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ### `Constant::kind` changed in the AST ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> ### Errors With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. ## Test Plan 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. ## Benchmarks #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 22, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 22, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 22, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 27, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 28, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
dhruvmanila
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2023
This PR adds support for PEP 701 in the parser to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer to construct the f-string node. Without an official grammar, the f-strings were parsed manually. Now that we've the specification, that is being used in the LALRPOP to parse the f-strings. This file includes the logic for parsing string literals and joining the implicit string concatenation. Now that we don't require parsing f-strings manually a lot of code involving the same is removed. Earlier, there were 2 entry points to this module: * `parse_string`: Used to parse a single string literal * `parse_strings`: Used to parse strings which were implicitly concatenated Now, there are 3 entry points: * `parse_string_literal`: Renamed from `parse_string` * `parse_fstring_middle`: Used to parse a `FStringMiddle` token which is basically a string literal without the quotes * `concatenate_strings`: Renamed from `parse_strings` but now it takes the parsed nodes instead. So, we just need to concatenate them into a single node. > A short primer on `FStringMiddle` token: This includes the portion of text inside the f-string that's not part of the expression and isn't an opening or closing brace. For example, in `f"foo {bar:.3f{x}} bar"`, the `foo `, `.3f` and ` bar` are `FStringMiddle` token content. ***Discussion in the official implementation: python/cpython#102855 (comment) This change in the AST is when unicode strings (prefixed with `u`) and f-strings are used in an implicitly concatenated string value. For example, ```python u"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" " some" ``` Pre Python 3.12, the kind field would be assigned only if the prefix was on the first string. So, taking the above example, both `"foo"` and `"baz some"` (implicit concatenation) would be given the `u` kind: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> But, post Python 3.12, only the string with the `u` prefix will be assigned the value: <details><summary>Pre 3.12 AST:</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='baz some') ``` </p> </details> Here are some more iterations around the change: 1. `"foo" f"{bar}" u"baz" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> 2. `"foo" f"{bar}" "baz" u"no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foo'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='bar', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value='bazno') ``` </p> </details> 3. `u"foo" f"bar {baz} realy" u"bar" "no"` <details><summary>Pre 3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno', kind='u') ``` </p> </details> <details><summary>3.12</summary> <p> ```python Constant(value='foobar ', kind='u'), FormattedValue( value=Name(id='baz', ctx=Load()), conversion=-1), Constant(value=' realybarno') ``` </p> </details> With the hand written parser, we were able to provide better error messages in case of any errors such as the following but now they all are removed and in those cases an "unexpected token" error will be thrown by lalrpop: * A closing delimiter was not opened properly * An opening delimiter was not closed properly * Empty expression not allowed The "Too many nested expressions in an f-string" was removed and instead we can create a lint rule for that. And, "The f-string expression cannot include the given character" was removed because f-strings now support those characters which are mainly same quotes as the outer ones, escape sequences, comments, etc. 1. Refactor existing test cases to use `parse_suite` instead of `parse_fstrings` (doesn't exists anymore) 2. Additional test cases are added as required Updated the snapshots. The change from `parse_fstrings` to `parse_suite` means that the snapshot would produce the module node instead of just a list of f-string parts. I've manually verified that the parts are still the same along with the node ranges. #7263 (comment) fixes: #7043 fixes: #6835
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The task is to use the new tokens emitted by the lexer (#7042) and create the
ExprFString
node using it. This will require major refactor instring.rs
to support this.Relevant PRs:
NUL
character in f-strings #7378The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: