-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Qwik example #359
Add Qwik example #359
Conversation
FYI @shairez in case you missed Bazel 😉 |
alt="Qwik Logo" | ||
width={400} | ||
height={147} | ||
src="https://cdn.builder.io/api/v1/image/assets%2FYJIGb4i01jvw0SRdL5Bt%2F667ab6c2283d4c4d878fb9083aacc10f" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
seems like the (very) old logo of Qwik.
I guess this starter has been generated from an old version of Qwik?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the logo in the library template at the moment: https://github.com/QwikDev/qwik/blob/main/starters/apps/library/src/components/logo/logo.tsx
I can replace it with what you are using on the docs or something else if you prefer? (the docs are not using an SVG exactly, but I think I can make it work). Also do you need this change in the Qwik repo as well?
The docs logo I could find: https://github.com/QwikDev/qwik/blob/main/packages/docs/src/components/svgs/qwik-logo.tsx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Mivr yeah good point, we need to update it, we'll do thanks!
Great job guys! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Mivr !!
Added a simple Qwik example as to: #347
The app and lib are both plain generation from the examples provided by Qwik.
The app is connected to the lib with a link in the monorepo and uses the library components.
I have not added tests yet, from what I have seen they are just using vite test for the front end tests, I suppose a UI test is needed? I am asking as the tests will be the same as a generic Vitest on the build side at least.
The dev cycle is slow at the moment or not working OK, due to: vitejs/vite#8619
There is a start command that works, but is slow (>5s per update).
Also there is a fast (<1s) command "devserver" that works well only for 1 library update.
For this to be resolved it seems some work on Vite is needed.
Changes are visible to end-users: no
Test plan