Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't patch ssl #73

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2024
Merged

Don't patch ssl #73

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2024

Conversation

arkadiyt
Copy link
Owner

@arkadiyt arkadiyt commented Nov 3, 2024

@arkadiyt arkadiyt force-pushed the atetelman--patch branch 2 times, most recently from ce80db1 to 6a6a97b Compare November 3, 2024 19:34
@arkadiyt arkadiyt changed the title wip Don't patch ssl Nov 3, 2024
@arkadiyt arkadiyt force-pushed the atetelman--patch branch 8 times, most recently from 1062abc to 8596766 Compare November 3, 2024 20:35
@arkadiyt arkadiyt marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2024 20:48
@arkadiyt arkadiyt merged commit 9c7c1d8 into main Nov 3, 2024
17 of 20 checks passed
@arkadiyt arkadiyt deleted the atetelman--patch branch November 3, 2024 20:54
mshibuya added a commit to carrierwaveuploader/carrierwave that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is the patch to SSLSocket still necessary? The ipaddr parameter could be used
1 participant