Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Rerun codegen and gen manifests #366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2020
Merged

chore: Rerun codegen and gen manifests #366

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2020

Conversation

dthomson25
Copy link
Member

Looks like the #318 merge, a merge conflict with the manifests get in and that commit used a different version of the codegen. This PR fixes the merge conflict and uses the older version of the codegen (the same version the maintainers are using). I will open up another issue to standardize the version of the code generator.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #366 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.97%   83.97%           
=======================================
  Files          70       70           
  Lines        6528     6528           
=======================================
  Hits         5482     5482           
  Misses        750      750           
  Partials      296      296

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c5b63c9...dca30fb. Read the comment docs.

@dthomson25 dthomson25 changed the title Rerun codegen and gen manifests chore: Rerun codegen and gen manifests Jan 17, 2020
@dthomson25 dthomson25 merged commit cc6abec into master Jan 18, 2020
@dthomson25 dthomson25 deleted the fix-codegen branch January 18, 2020 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants