Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove scale down annotation after scaling down #187

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2019

Conversation

dthomson25
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #187 into master will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #187      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.37%   82.41%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        3076     3082       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         2534     2540       +6     
  Misses        395      395              
  Partials      147      147
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
rollout/sync.go 77.81% <100%> (+0.2%) ⬆️
utils/annotations/annotations.go 96.73% <100%> (+0.1%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b6994d8...32dc552. Read the comment docs.

@dthomson25 dthomson25 force-pushed the remove-scale-annotation branch from 5e65a48 to 1a234b5 Compare October 7, 2019 23:05
@dthomson25 dthomson25 force-pushed the remove-scale-annotation branch from 1a234b5 to 32dc552 Compare October 7, 2019 23:17
@dthomson25 dthomson25 merged commit b0a5487 into master Oct 8, 2019
@dthomson25 dthomson25 deleted the remove-scale-annotation branch October 8, 2019 00:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants