feat: allow to show compilation properties without providing a sketch

[Bikappa]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

See how to contribute

• The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull
  Requests
  before creating one)
• The PR follows
  our contributing guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
• configuration.schema.json updated if new parameters are added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

Other information

Fixes #1047

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 3.29% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (2900744) 35.01% compared to head (76e00bf) 35.02%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2089   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.01%   35.02%           
=======================================
  Files         232      232           
  Lines       20560    20593   +33     
=======================================
+ Hits         7200     7213   +13     
- Misses      12513    12535   +22     
+ Partials      847      845    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	35.02% <3.29%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
commands/compile/compile.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/cli/arguments/sketch.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/cli/board/attach.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/cli/compile/compile.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/cli/debug/debug.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...acy/builder/fail_if_buildpath_equals_sketchpath.go	70.00% <0.00%> (-30.00%)	⬇️
legacy/builder/setup_build_properties.go	69.69% <100.00%> (+0.94%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[cmaglie]

Actually, I don't think we need to go into the shenanigans of the builder anymore after #2082.
Probably we may also remove the "show properties" functionality from the legacy builder, but I need to try it.
I'll draft it in another PR so we can decide on the best approach.

[cmaglie]

Superseded by #2151