Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.8.1 #2072

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 22, 2022
Merged

v0.8.1 #2072

merged 12 commits into from
Dec 22, 2022

Conversation

brenthuisman
Copy link
Contributor

@brenthuisman brenthuisman commented Dec 20, 2022

No description provided.

@brenthuisman brenthuisman marked this pull request as ready for review December 22, 2022 14:09
@brenthuisman brenthuisman changed the title v0.8.1-rc v0.8.1 Dec 22, 2022
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
# pip requirements file
numpy!=1.24.0 # See https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/22826
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we add this restriction also to the spack package?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The restriction is only required for the examples (a single one in fact), which isn't a target in the spack package. So I don't think it's necessary.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

still, numpy is a dependency in the spack package when building with python, so would be nice to have imo

Copy link
Contributor Author

@brenthuisman brenthuisman Dec 22, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This dependency is because Arbor exposes some data as numpy arrays (spike array). This won't trigger the bug. The user would need to write code themselves that runs into it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok let's leave it then.

Copy link
Contributor

@boeschf boeschf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thank you!

@brenthuisman brenthuisman merged commit c683a1f into arbor-sim:master Dec 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants