-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
trivial: crate name change #5811
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
msmouse
requested review from
davidiw,
movekevin,
wrwg and
a team
as code owners
December 7, 2022 21:28
runtian-zhou
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2022
runtian-zhou
reviewed
Dec 7, 2022
@@ -107,8 +107,9 @@ Extra metadata (e.g. description, code url) can be part of the ProposalType stru | |||
Currently, we have three attributes that are used by the voting flow. | |||
1. RESOLVABLE_TIME_METADATA_KEY: this is uesed to record the resolvable time to ensure that resolution has to be done non-atomically. | |||
2. IS_MULTI_STEP_PROPOSAL_KEY: this is used to track if a proposal is single-step or multi-step. | |||
3. IS_MULTI_STEP_PROPOSAL_IN_EXECUTION_KEY: this attribute only exists for and applies to multi-step proposals. The value is used to | |||
indicate if a multi-step proposal is in execution. If yes, we will disable further voting for this multi-step proposal. | |||
3. IS_MULTI_STEP_PROPOSAL_IN_EXECUTION_KEY: this attribute only applies to multi-step proposals. A single-step proposal will not have |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Create a separate PR for this? Seems irrelevant change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
grao1991
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2022
JoshLind
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2022
msmouse
force-pushed
the
1207alden-aptos
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 7, 2022 23:20
5ae9906
to
319d62e
Compare
msmouse
force-pushed
the
1207alden-aptos
branch
from
December 8, 2022 05:39
319d62e
to
b64fad4
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
✅ Forge suite
|
✅ Forge suite
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
backup-cli is now aptos-backup-cli and one reference didn't get changed.
Test Plan