Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistently use transactions to update database #866

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2019

Conversation

smira
Copy link
Contributor

@smira smira commented Aug 9, 2019

For any action which is multi-step (requires updating more than 1 DB
key), use transaction to make update atomic.

Also pack big chunks of updates (importing packages for importing and
mirror updates) into single transaction to improve aptly performance and
get some isolation.

Note that still layers up (Collections) provide some level of isolation,
so this is going to shine with the future PRs to remove collection
locks.

Spin-off of #459

Checklist

  • unit-test added (if change is algorithm)
  • functional test added/updated (if change is functional)
  • man page updated (if applicable)
  • bash completion updated (if applicable)
  • documentation updated
  • author name in AUTHORS

For any action which is multi-step (requires updating more than 1 DB
key), use transaction to make update atomic.

Also pack big chunks of updates (importing packages for importing and
mirror updates) into single transaction to improve aptly performance and
get some isolation.

Note that still layers up (Collections) provide some level of isolation,
so this is going to shine with the future PRs to remove collection
locks.

Spin-off of aptly-dev#459
@smira smira requested a review from sliverc August 9, 2019 19:37
@smira smira added the 1.5.0 label Aug 9, 2019
@smira smira merged commit 77d7c38 into aptly-dev:master Aug 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants