Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Splitting JS Object body dump vs parsed JS Object update to remove race condition originated bad state #33124

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

trishaanand
Copy link
Contributor

@trishaanand trishaanand commented May 2, 2024

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9029211697
Commit: 190f768
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 2, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing JavaScript collection management and action collection handling. New methods for updating JS collection bodies and unpublished action collections have been introduced, improving specificity and efficiency. Changes also involve refactoring existing functionalities and updating method signatures to streamline processes and integrate new logic, ensuring a more robust and flexible system.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/src/ce/api/JSActionAPI.tsx Added updateJSCollectionBody method for updating JavaScript collection bodies via PUT requests.
app/client/src/sagas/JSPaneSagas.ts Modified handleUpdateJSCollectionBody to use updateJSCollectionBody. Changed response type and updated logic for handling collection updates.
app/server/.../services/ce/LayoutCollectionServiceCEImpl.java Added new methods and refactored existing ones for better management of action collections. Updated method signatures and integrated new logic for resource handling.

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edf5662 and 190f768.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/LayoutCollectionServiceCEImpl.java (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/LayoutCollectionServiceCEImpl.java

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label May 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/server/scripts/start-dev-server.sh (1)

Line range hint 4-4: Add error handling for the cd command to prevent script execution in an unintended directory.

- cd "$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)/.."
+ cd "$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)/.." || exit

@trishaanand trishaanand added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label May 2, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2024

Failed server tests

  • com.appsmith.server.solutions.CreateDBTablePageSolutionTests#createPageWithLessColumnsComparedToTemplateForSql

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2024

Failed server tests

  • com.appsmith.server.solutions.CreateDBTablePageSolutionTests#createPageWithInvalidApplicationIdTest

@PathVariable String id,
@Valid @RequestBody String body,
@RequestHeader(name = FieldName.BRANCH_NAME, required = false) String branchName) {
log.debug("Going to update action collection body with id: {}, branch: {}", id, branchName);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Do we need these kinda log lines? I think we should start getting rid of them.

nidhi-nair
nidhi-nair previously approved these changes May 3, 2024
@subrata71
Copy link
Contributor

QQ: Doesn't this PR need the client-side changes w.r.t. modules and workflows? @trishaanand Asking this because there is JS object in both workflows and modules.

@trishaanand
Copy link
Contributor Author

QQ: Doesn't this PR need the client-side changes w.r.t. modules and workflows? @trishaanand Asking this because there is JS object in both workflows and modules.

@ApekshaBhosale : Is this correct? Do we need changes in modules and workflows code flow as well?

@trishaanand trishaanand added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels May 9, 2024
@ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor

ApekshaBhosale commented May 9, 2024

@trishaanand i don't think so because underline uses same JS objects.it will be fine! @ayushpahwa can you confirm once?

@ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor

@trishaanand checked code for workflow as well. looks like it uses same underline js object so it will be fine!

@dvj1988
Copy link
Contributor

dvj1988 commented May 9, 2024

/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9018338440.
Workflow: On demand build Docker image and deploy preview.
skip-tests: true.
env: ``.
PR: 33124.
recreate: .

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-33124.dp.appsmith.com

@ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor

@dvj1988 @trishaanand format of JS object body is different so regex is failing on client side. extra "/" i see

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Comment on lines +589 to +599
const response: ApiResponse<any> =
yield JSActionAPI.updateJSCollectionBody(
jsCollection.id,
jsCollection.body,
);
const isValidResponse: boolean = yield validateResponse(response);
if (isValidResponse) {
// since server is not sending the info about whether the js collection is main or not
// we are retaining it manually
const updatedJSCollection: JSCollection = {
...response.data,
...jsCollection,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid direct modification of the JS collection object before confirming the update success.

- jsCollection["body"] = actionPayload.payload.body;
+ const updatedBody = actionPayload.payload.body;

Use updatedBody for the API call, and only update jsCollection after confirming the response is valid.


Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
const response: ApiResponse<any> =
yield JSActionAPI.updateJSCollectionBody(
jsCollection.id,
jsCollection.body,
);
const isValidResponse: boolean = yield validateResponse(response);
if (isValidResponse) {
// since server is not sending the info about whether the js collection is main or not
// we are retaining it manually
const updatedJSCollection: JSCollection = {
...response.data,
...jsCollection,
const updatedBody = actionPayload.payload.body;
const response: ApiResponse<any> =
yield JSActionAPI.updateJSCollectionBody(
jsCollection.id,
updatedBody,
);
const isValidResponse: boolean = yield validateResponse(response);
if (isValidResponse) {
// since server is not sending the info about whether the js collection is main or not
// we are retaining it manually
const updatedJSCollection: JSCollection = {
...jsCollection,

…org/appsmith into chore/split-js-body-update-race
@dvj1988
Copy link
Contributor

dvj1988 commented May 10, 2024

/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true

Copy link

Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/9028726207.
Workflow: On demand build Docker image and deploy preview.
skip-tests: true.
env: ``.
PR: 33124.
recreate: .

Copy link

Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-33124.dp.appsmith.com

@dvj1988 dvj1988 added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels May 10, 2024
@trishaanand trishaanand merged commit 7250422 into release May 13, 2024
84 checks passed
@trishaanand trishaanand deleted the chore/split-js-body-update-race branch May 13, 2024 04:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants