Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RCO system requirements to v1 doc #634

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

Add RCO system requirements to v1 doc #634

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

kabicin
Copy link
Collaborator

@kabicin kabicin commented May 22, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@leochr leochr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kabicin Thanks for the PR. Looks good. Just one comment about serviceability storage and a few other regarding the new OCP/k8s versions


==== OCP requirements

Runtime Component operator requires an link:++https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.15/welcome/index.html++[OCP version 4.15], link:++https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.14/welcome/index.html++[OCP version 4.14], or link:++https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/welcome/index.html++[OCP version 4.12] cluster on Linux x86_64 (amd64), Linux on Power (ppc64le), or Linux on IBM Z (s390x) platform, with cluster-admin permissions. To manage OCP projects with OCP CLI (oc) commands, the installation also requires the link:++https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.9/cli_reference/openshift_cli/getting-started-cli.html++[OCP CLI].
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are installing a Runtime Component operator on a Kubernetes cluster, your environment must meet the Kubernetes cluster requirements.

==== Kubernetes requirements
Runtime Component operator requires a Kubernetes version 1.28, 1.27, 1.26, or 1.25 cluster on Linux x86_64 (amd64), Linux on Power (ppc64le), or Linux on IBM Z (s390x) platform, with cluster-admin permissions.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add 1.29 to the list


Your environment might need to meet certain storage requirements when you use Runtime Component operator.

No storage requirements exist for Runtime Component operator. However, if you are using the Runtime Component operator serviceability feature, and you have applications with multiple replicas, storage must support `ReadWriteMany` access mode. For more information, see link:#storage-for-serviceability[Storage for serviceability].
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Serviceability storage is specific to Liberty Operators and doesn't apply to RCO. So we should exclude the following in RCO:

However, if you are using the Runtime Component operator serviceability feature, and you have applications with multiple replicas, storage must support `ReadWriteMany` access mode. For more information, see link:#storage-for-serviceability[Storage for serviceability].

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated and I removed

Your environment might need to meet certain storage requirements when you use Runtime Component operator.

as well.

@leochr leochr self-requested a review August 16, 2024 14:12
Copy link
Member

@leochr leochr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kabicin Looks good. Thank you

@leochr leochr merged commit c4d8045 into main Aug 19, 2024
@leochr leochr deleted the docs-sizing branch August 19, 2024 19:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants