Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement custom command codec #817

Closed

Conversation

mykola-mokhnach
Copy link
Contributor

Change list

This is kind of dirty hack to make W3C protocol working properly with Appium. Currently Selenium has a bunch of hardcoded javascript snippets there, which are not going to work in mobile env. I'm also not sure how this is going to work in web context.

Perhaps, @TikhomirovSergey, you'll have better ideas on how to improve it. Check the recent conversation in java_client Slack group for more details.

Types of changes

  • No changes in production code.
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Copy link
Contributor

@TikhomirovSergey TikhomirovSergey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks very good. I need to finish my work on capabilities to check all the scope on 1.8.0

@appium appium deleted a comment Jan 29, 2018
@mykola-mokhnach
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've moved the custom codec to a different package and addressed linker complains. Can you please check it one more time @TikhomirovSergey ?

@appium appium deleted a comment Jan 29, 2018
@appium appium deleted a comment Jan 29, 2018
@appium appium deleted a comment Jan 30, 2018
TikhomirovSergey added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2018
…w3c_codec

 Addition to the #817. JsonToMobileElementConverter: fixed
@mykola-mokhnach mykola-mokhnach deleted the appium_w3c_codec branch February 7, 2018 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants