Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

supergraph coprocessor followup, with docs update and changelog update #3603

Closed

Conversation

o0Ignition0o
Copy link
Contributor

This is a followup to #3408 that:

  • removes the path variable,
  • makes sure we only send the sdl and method if they're enabled in the configuration
  • updates the documentation to reflect that.

This doesn't need a changelog entry because it is covered by the previous PR.

@o0Ignition0o o0Ignition0o requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2023 11:20
@router-perf
Copy link

router-perf bot commented Aug 18, 2023

CI performance tests

  • xxlarge-request - Stress test with 100 MB request payload
  • step - Basic stress test that steps up the number of users over time
  • events_without_dedup - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication DISABLED
  • events - Stress test for events with a lot of users and deduplication ENABLED
  • large-request - Stress test with a 1 MB request payload
  • const - Basic stress test that runs with a constant number of users
  • no-graphos - Basic stress test, no GraphOS.
  • reload - Reload test over a long period of time at a constant rate of users
  • step-jemalloc-tuning - Clone of the basic stress test for jemalloc tuning
  • xlarge-request - Stress test with 10 MB request payload
  • events_big_cap_high_rate - Stress test for events with a lot of users, deduplication enabled and high rate event with a big queue capacity

@o0Ignition0o
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed in favor of reverting the supergraph coprocessor pr and reopening it cleanly for 1.28

@abernix abernix deleted the igni/supergraph_coprocessor_followup branch May 3, 2024 16:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant